
That said, Jim Jarmusch's Broken Flowers is the best film of 2005.
The plot is a delicate thing, that you almost certainly know already: Bill Murray plays Don Johnston (voice the "t," if you please), a once-and-current lothario who receives an anonymous letter from a woman he left 20 years earlier, informing him that he has a son. With the over-enthusiastic help of his neighbor (Jeffrey Wright, waltzing off with every scene he's in), Don tracks down the women who may have authored the letter. He goes to find them.
Going into the film, I had been led to believe that Murray's performace would be the culmination of the Rushmore/Lost in Translation/The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou school. This is not accurate. In those films, Murray played a lonely man seeking companionship and meaning. Here, he plays a man who is too alone to realize that he is lonely. In the earlier films, Murray's characters grew out of the desire to reach out to another soul, however briefly. Here, he does not reach out. He does not wish to reach out. Each of the women who he visits would prefer he not be there, and he clearly wishes the same. The film is built on Bill Murray doing nothing - not speaking, not moving, not thinking.
I will not spoil the film by describing the arc of Don's development. Or stagnation. It is somewhat hard to tell which happens. It is hard to tell if they are not the same thing.
The film functions on many, many levels; I do not want to tell you what they are, because the joy of the film is finding them for yourself. This is a perfect film - perfect in conception and writing, perfect in performance, perfect in craftsmanship. After the final shot cut to black, I was aware of slumping forward in my seat, and gasping for breath. When a movie's ending leaves you literally breathless, you have just seen somthing pretty special.
10/10
I only gave it a 9 out of 10, but we basically seem to agree, great film. I was still thinking about it hours afterwards. I'm just picky about giving out 10's.
ReplyDeletei wasn't going to go see it, because i am still mad at Jim Jarmusch for letting the utter crap that was Coffee and Cigarettes (discounting the cinematography, which was lovely). your review, however, and my fondness for all things Bill Murray, have convinced me to see it. so know that you have won over the soul of at least one skeptic.
ReplyDeleteerrata: "letting *loose* the utter crap that was Coffee and Cigarettes"
ReplyDeleteOh, Cameron! Coffee and Cigarettes wasn't that bad. I admit some of the bits sucked hard, but the Molina/Coogan sequence and the Blanchett sequence were as good as anything else I saw in a theater last year. Broken Flowers is totally different though, so it shouldn't be a concern.
ReplyDeleteKarl: I too, am picky about 10's. It just goes to show how good of a weekend I had (BF and Saraband are the first 10's I've seen since 2004).
The Molina/Coogan segment is as good as cinema gets.... until you see Broken Flowers that is.
ReplyDelete