04 July 2006

I AM NOT A PATRIOT

Dusk in Evanston. Across the street, teenagers are setting off bottle rockets. Just at the edge of hearing, someone is playing "God Bless America" on a stereo. On the internet, right-wing commentors are loudly trumpeting the superior patriotism of those who follow the Way of Bush, while left-winger are insisting that the true patriotism is to be found with those who question the direction our country is headed. Elsewhere, Americans are watching fireworks or dousing barbecues and finishing up picnics and brushing the potato chips off of red, white and blue t-shirts. They are all united in their love of country and pride of nation. Every man, woman and child is proud this night to be an American.

I do not share their love - I do not share their pride. On this day, I instead reflect upon the sick thing that this country has become and I despair. Yes, I come from the United States; but I cannot help it.
"Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel" -Samuel Johnson
Two-hundred and thirty years ago on this day, a document was signed by the representatives of thirteen English colonies on the eastern coast of North America. In this document, Thomas Jefferson of Virginia wrote the most important words in the history of Western civilization: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." A government founded upon these principles would be the most perfect imaginable; a government which took as its guiding rule the right of all its citizens to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness would stand as the beacon for reason and morality across the world.

The United States of America does not possess such a government. This nation is instead ruled according to the principle that Might makes Right; that the victor shall have the spoils; and it is ruled by men (and a precious few token women) who seek primarily to increase their own power and influence by providing a country where the wealthy and the privileged are given rights and freedoms at the expense of the disenfranchised.

The very notion of "patriotism" is odious to me. Blind fealty to any nation - any culture - any ideology - can only lead and has only led to stratification and division. To be a patriot is to wall oneself off from the whole of the world which does not belong, to create Others, and to adopt a feeling of superiority. "He sets himself apart in his own country, under his own flag, and sneers at the other nations." Pride in country leads inevitably to a believe that all other countries must be inferior, and this leads to the desire to conquer, to control and to build Empire.

Patriotism in this country, at this time, is no more indefensible than in England during the Victorian Age or Germany under the Third Reich - indeed, it is undoubtedly to be preferred by a great margin. But to be a patriot, to blindly cry "I love America!" in this decade is a mindless abdication of moral responsibility and good sense.
"It is lamentable, that to be a good patriot one must become the enemy of the rest of mankind." -Voltaire
The United States has in the past been a force of greatness. It is because of this country that Nazi Germany was defeated. Americans have invented some of the greatest machines and tools in human history. In 1776, this became the first country in modern times, and still the longest-lived, to establish a representative governments. And it was in our Bill of Rights that the most important cornerstones of a free society - the right to free expression, the right to private safety, the right to trial by jury, among many others - were first codified and guaranteed.

But of late, we have not been a force for good in the world. Instead, our country's government has in the last few decades become a shameful and destructive entity, serving only its own accretion of power at the expense of the security and well-being of our people, our resources, and the world at large.

It is not least that the Bush Administration launched a war of aggresion against Iraq - the second-such war in our history - based on a shifting rationale of lies, threats and greed. Consider too that we alone of all First World nations refused to sign the Kyoto Treaty, thereby ensuring its failure in the world. Our country is alone in the industrial West supporting the death penalty.

And consider above all the slow yet inexorable stripping away of those very rights enshrined in the first ten amendments to our constitution, in the name of the phantom threat of terrorism. The people of this country have willingly given up freedom in the name of security.
"PATRIOT, n. One to whom the interests of a part seem superior to those of the whole. The dupe of statesmen and the tool of conquerors." -Ambrose Bierce
I would be able to maintain some degree of hopeful patriotism if only I believed that our current crises were the result of temporary stresses. But this is not the case. The current failing of our country is the result of widespread ignorance in our populace. Leaders cannot use fear where people can think clearly, yet in America we see the constant use of fear to subjugate and control the many. Idleness and a desire for instant gratification have turned Americans into weak and foolish creatures, easily led and more easily lied to.

I am not a patriot because in America, we will spend $419.3 billion on defense and $29.3 billion on "homeland security," compared to $56 billion on education and $10.6 billion on the interior, of which an insulting $121.3 million was earmarked for the arts.

I am not a patriot because I live in a country that is torn apart by partisanship, a country in which any difference in opinion or belief is met not with debate and understanding, but with outright hatred on both sides.

I am not a patriot because the social agenda of this country is directed by a lunatic fringe of Christianity denounced by the great majority of Christians.

I am not a patriot because "freedom of religion" means wobbly freedom for Christians and some Jews, while Buddhists and Hindus and pagans are the objects of ridicule, and Muslims and atheists are the object of eliminationist rhetoric.

I am not a patriot because the legislators who dictate a woman's control over her reproductive system and her sexuality are old men.

I am not a patriot because the legislators who deny the right of non-heterosexuals to love and marry are heterosexual men.

I am not a patriot because the legislators who ignore the problems facing poor minorites, and refuse to enact any law to aid the disenfranchised, are white men.

I am not a patriot because the United States Senate has recently supported an initiative making English the official language of the country.

I am not a patriot because 12.4 percent (pdf) of all Americans live below the poverty line.

I am not a patriot because 15.7 percent of all Americans do not have health insurance.

I am not a patriot because our current system of taxation is designed to safeguard the wealthy while placing an undue burden on the poor.

I am not a patriot because our population is kept in perpetual ignorance by a news media which exists only to generate profit, and by a public education system that is underfunded to a point where it is not merely difficult to function, but whether it is functional at all is debatable.

I am not a patriot because 46 percent of Americans believe that God created mankind within the last 10,000 years, in contradiction to the most elemental and uncontroversial scientific observations of biology and geology.

I am not a patriot because the subject of global warming, on which there is 100% agreement in the climatological-scientific community, is considered an open debate by the media and the population at large.

I am not a patriot because it is not imaginable for a non-Christian to hold the office of president.

I am not a patriot because nearly all positions of power and influence are still held by old white men.

I am not a patriot because if I go anywhere in the world and announce, "I am an American," there is a risk of my being met with mockery, scorn, hostility or violence.

In times past, it was possible to brush off all of these concerns with a simple assurance that history will out, the Bushes of the world will get their due and good men will return to government. I do not believe this any longer. American democracy is broken when in 2000, the man who lost the election can be brought to power by a partisan court, and in 2004 that same man can win an election through threatening and disenfranchising portions of the electorate. We cannot vote our way out of this morass.

Nor I do not advocate revolution, for no revolution could succeed. In fact, I advocate nothing. America, once the most promising nation in the world, is dying. I do not know how long its death will take. Rome, the greatest empire in the history of the West, took nearly 400 years to die after it abandoned its democratic core. I suspect this, as everything else, will be a quicker process for the modern world.
"A Patriot: the person who can holler the loudest without knowing what he is hollering about." -Mark Twain
Night in Evanston. I hear fireworks exploding over Lake Michigan, about a mile away. They are quite loud - I expect this is the finalé of the evening. I imagine it is very beautiful.

Happy Independence Day.

4 comments:

  1. Bravo, darling. I couldn't have said it--any of it--better myself. I can't wait to read your book(s).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Of course, even among liberals, there are two sides. One side feels it necessary and appropriate to crticize our nation on its Independence Day, when so many celebrate something that it is so easy to believe does not exist. I see every part of this argument and recognize it as valid. I cannot take to task those who would choose to use July 4th as the perfect opportunity to hate on the multitude of things upon which we ought to hate; your list is sound and good, and I can take no issue with any part of it.

    There is also, however, another side of the story. I personally choose to hate on the United States 364 days out of every non-leap year, and allow this to be the one day I set aside for different feelings. There is, after all, another side of the equation, and as reprehensible as the first side is, the other side is certainly worth recognition, and I simply allow July 4th to be that day, not wanting to be subversive at the expense of finding a random day in which to espouse these feelings.

    The profound thing that happened to me last year was watching two grown Pakistani men cry as they experienced "God Bless America" and the fireworks in Grant Park for the very first time as American citizens. Tears, rolling down their faces, showed me physical proof that there is more to this nation than a Republican Senate and a crooked, evil President whose office has been twice obtained through crooked means. Like I say, no need to ignore these facts, and I personally find it proper to acknowledge them on a regular basis 364 days a year. This thing that I feel is worth one day, however, can be found in the tears of those men. It can be found in the excitement of my friend Karoliina taking a shot of Jaeger the night we went out to celebrate her citizenship this year (and she's as left-leaning, pacifisti, and atheist as they come). There's something here to be proud of.

    We live in a country where you can make that blog post, and I can agree and disagree with it, without the slightest bit of fear of retribution. It is easy to take this for granted, what with the way that this has been our right for 230 years. But it is certainly not universally true around the world, and moreover, were it not for us, likely would continue to be false in a plurality of the places where it no longer is.

    I'm obtaining a second degree in film, of all things, right now. That very fact reveals so many things about what we have that I cannot begin to express it. How many nations can claim to have the energy and resources for cinema at all? How many can claim to have so much cinema as to allow it as a course of study? How many can offer it as a graduate program? How many can self-sustain a large film economy over several decades without interruption? Hint: the answer to the last question is "two" and the answers to the preceding questions are not much higher. All of this brings nothing in particular to bear, but relies upon so many factors that I cannot hope to name them all. The bottom line is this: we have a culture of our own, one that has sustained and developed on its own for many years. We have opportunity and promise, and being born in the United States of America literally means that anything (truly) is possible. Hard? Sure. But short of moving to the US or one of a handful of other places, many of which we were instrumental in developing, people born in most countries of the world have a great many things that are simply impossible for them, no matter what effort they exert or promise they show.

    We've got a great thing going here. A profound and, dare I say it, rare thing. We have a representative Democracy that has lasted more than 200 years, striving to believe in its own core values of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. We attempt to promote a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty. And you know what? We get it right almost all of the time. That is rare indeed, and it shouldn't be wasted, and it for damned sure shouldn't be taken for granted.

    The other thing that it seems prudent to mention is that the ways in which the United States is broken are, by and large, the problem of the people. In a representative Democracy, the policies are made and maintained by a group of people selected by the electorate. While it is easy to point out that the disenfranchised are not represented by their peers, it is less simple, and more revealing, to realize that they are represented by people who are (still, more often than not, though ALARMINGLY not always) elected by the people that actually choose to vote. This point brings up two things that are central to the problem (along with terrible election irregularities that I cannot excuse and that I find to be the most shameful element of our fractured society). The first is that too many people, largely the disenfranchised, do not choose to vote. Representative Democracy works only when the representatives actually represent their constituency. The other more alarming fact is that our nation, where it is broken, is largely broken from the inside, and the system is not to blame (for the system is as close to perfect as is reasonable to expect from any Constitutional Republic). Those electors that choose to vote and maintain the majority-enabling, minority-damning Government of ours are the by-product of our own success and prosperity. Everything that makes this nation wonderful and worth fighting for does, by its very nature, create exactly the sort of element that threatens its complete fruition. For the white male majority that achieved liberty so long ago has been slowly joined by others, resulting in a status-quo in which more people than not are able to succeed and see little need for the expansion of liberty, simply because they do not feel their own liberty threatened. This is terrifying and true: one remains liberal only until they feel that things have reached the point where they are comfortable, and they then become conservative, naturally attempting to maintain the good thing they feel that they have going.

    It is easy to hate the white men that threaten a woman's right to choose. And I find them worthy of our hate. It is, however, more complicated indeed to hate the thousands upon thousands of women, "disenfranchised" minority women even, that campaign fervently for these very candidates. They campaign not blindly, nor based on other politics, but on that very issue: they support these men, en masse, because these men want to threaten their own reproductive liberty. But they were raised in a society and a subculture that allowed them to grow up free of the worries that others face, and their reproductive liberty simply isn't something that they've a need to use. Though we hate this situation, is it right to hate these women? Further, is it right to hate the nation that has provided them with the luxury of not needing their reproductive liberty, such that they are willing to part with it so easily?

    The promising side of all of this is that the "enfranchised majority" has historically always found a way to diminish and segments of the "disenfranchised minority" have found their way in, such that the concept of "enfranchised majority" can be reborn. It happened in 1865, and it happened in 1920. Things are far from perfect in either of those situations, but we have a Republic where progress is made and cannot be stopped. And I for one can't help but know that it isn't stopping anytime soon. It is fair to criticize the speed of the progress, and necessary to criticize the hypocracy of the elements that impede that progress. But there is progress all the same, progress as part of a machine that seems unable to stop; a machine that historically and practically cannot be stopped. And that, in all of the world, is something to be proud of.

    It is easy to hate the United States and easier still to proclaim a hatred and distrust of patriotism (certainly that word, not least of all in its use in the name of a damnable act of Congress, has been taken away from us). It is, however, lazy, and the product of entitlement; it is the route taken by the hobbyist protest community on so many upscale college campuses, willing to bite the hand that feeds them because the hand has always been there to feed them, has always fed them, and always will feed them. It is easy, lazy, and irresponsible to cast a darkness over patriotism and to distance oneself from it; to emphasize faults at the expense of completely ignoring significant triumphs.

    A true patriot, I believe, is one that cannot abide the tyrrany present in our current administration, or any similar administration; one that resents the trespass on liberty that seems to happen routinely in our nation. But that resentment can only grow out of a profound love for the nation that ought not have such questions raised, the nation that, because of its profound accomplishment, ought to know better.

    Even if we show that love only one day out of the year.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So, Will, you can write a 1500 word essay on patriotism (which I found extremely well-done, by the way), but you can't put together an "Essential Fassbinder" list?

    I tease because I love.

    ReplyDelete
  4. will, don't you have your own blog? it is nicer to read things that are not in a tiny box.

    ReplyDelete

Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.

Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.