25 June 2009

ROBOTS IN DISGUST

I did not like Transformers. I have come to think, in fact, that it is Michael Bay's worst movie ever, just barely noodging out The Island, although it ought to be mentioned that I have not seen Pearl Harbor, and I'm fucking well disinclined to ever go out and see Pearl Harbor. But I was talking about Transformers, a movie that struck me as being loud and stupid and confusing to look, with all the CGI robot characters seeming to be constructed entirely out of six-inch metal shards crammed together in the semblance of a biped, and when one of those robots fought another robot, it frankly looked to me like just a whole bunch of metal bits all wobbling around onscreen at 100 miles an hour. It was a movie that give me no joy whatsoever.

It is, stacked next to Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, pure cinema embodied, a work of art unparalleled.

Because, sweet baby Jesus and all the baby apostles, Revenge of the Fallen is just complete asshattery. In my darkest morbidity, I don't think I have ever imagined that a $200 million summer tent pole film could possibly be so awful. A wretched comedy about uninteresting human beings plays out, interrupted at frequent intervals by scenes of gigantic machines walloping the living crap out of one another for arbitrary reasons, while grossly busy visual effects that look far more like a cartoon than something meant to be integrated with live action footage scream across the screen with reckless, mind-numbing abandon. Meanwhile a needlessly complex and recklessly trite plot taps out, one scene after another, with the oozing slowness of the last drop of molasses creeping down the side of a jar. It is, unfathomably, a movie that is at once so chaotic that the only way to deal with it is to shrink back in the theater chair and let it roar out its guttering violence, and so boring that it almost begs you to fall asleep at the interminable passages of the two teenage protagonists making schmoopy faces at each other.

The film opens in 17,000 BC, which is a coincidence indeed, given that it is roughly 17,000 years long - although I find that all the official documentation claims that it's 149 minutes. Perhaps, but they are the longest 149 minutes that I have experienced. Out 1 rushes by like a TV sitcom in comparison. Whatever the case, in 17,000 BC we learn that '30s-style "ooga booga" type African tribespeople have a fondness for hunting tigers (in Africa?) in a series of one-second shots that fade up from black and fade back down to black, a pointless stylistic quirk that put the film on my bad side pretty much from the second it started. We also learn that they don't have much ability to fight off the 30-foot robots who've set up some kind of giant death machine in their desert, but what exactly those robots are doing there, and how it happened that they didn't go ahead and make the whole human race extinct in a couple of days back at that time, is something that we won't learn for a while. A really long while.

The action skips back to the present, where Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf), whom you perhaps recall was the savior of the human race two years ago when the evil Decepticons and the noble Autobots turned Los Angeles into a war zone. Sam is headed off to college on the east coast, eager to become a normal kid after his damaging experiences in '07, even if that means trying to do the whole long-distance thing with his ridiculously hot gear-head girlfriend Mikaela (Megan Fox). But things aren't so easy for him, after her accidentally activates a tiny shard of the MacGuffin Box from the last movie, and turns all of the appliances in his folks' house into teeny little Decepticons. This quickly-solved problem is only the first of many nightmares facing Sam as he becomes the center of a Decepticon quest to revive the ancient evil leader known as The Fallen (voiced by Tony Todd). This quest takes Sam from Washington, D.C. to Egypt, all along the way getting shot at by some very big anthropomorphic machines and rescued by some other anthropomorphic machines, the CGI cast of the new film more than tripling the modest 14 Transformers seen in the original.

Also along the way, Sam is followed by a litany of godawful comic moments, from when his mom (Julie White) accidentally eats a pot brownie about 30 seconds after arriving at his school, and proceeds to tell anyone who'll listen about how he lost his virginity; to the old reformed Decepticon Jetfire (Mark Ryan) who pads about with musty old man shtick and tosses plot holes out like a Pez dispenser; to the slapsticky business centered around former U.S. special operative Simmons (John Turturro, returning for what I hope to God was a hefty paycheck) and Sam's hacker roommate Leo (Ramon Rodriguez), possibly the most played-out character in the film - he'd have stunk of cliché in a 1993 episode of The X-Files. And then there's what is destined to be the most notorious moment in a film of notorious moments, when the little RC car Decepticon that Mikaela has been training to be a good guy starts humping her foot.

Although perhaps I overspeak; the Autobot twins, Mudflap (Reno Wilson) and Skids (Tom Kenny), mind-bogglingly racist stereotypes of gangsta tropes given robot car form, seem to be destined for some healthy notoriety of their own.

Careening madly to its abrupt end, the film makes a celebration out of destroying the Great Pyramid of Giza, as though it were just a tinkertoy prop; countless human lives are lost with no more acknowledgment than a warning to the Autobots that they almost got found out on their Shanghai trip. Compared to all of this, Bay's customary misogyny, present here as in the last by a series of porny, objectifying shots of Fox that make her look like the product being hawked in a tequila commercial, is downright comforting.

The film is also ugly as shit, filmed by some anonymous bloke named Ben Seresin with incomprehensible levels of film grain, and the aforementioned CGI that is so shiny it drifts right out of "realism" and into "world's costliest video game" territory. At least, thank all the pretty angels, in this film when the Transformers transform, you can sometimes tell that how it works mechanically, rather than it just looking like metallic shapes melting into car form. Small favors make the world go 'round.

If, somehow, you can get past all of this, I defy you to jump the film's last hurdle: the scenes of robot-on-robot-violence that are the film's single raison d'ĂȘtre, though numerous, make up a surprisingly modest proportion of the film's 917 462 149 minutes, and the rest of the movie is either horrible comedy (as a general thing, if the last film was an action movie with lots of terrible comic relief, this is more like a terrible comedy that is sometimes given over to action scenes), or the damnably bad love story drama between Sam and Mikaela, hinging on the fact that she's put out that he won't use the word "love". And thus it is that a solid hour of a 2.5 hour movie, right in the middle, when it needs to build all the momentum it can muster, is a punishing grind; and thus can 2.5 hours seem twice that.

I do not merely dislike Transformers 2. I feel like I have been betrayed - betrayed by the very same Cinema to whom I have sacrificed so much of my time and emotion and spirit, the Cinema that I treasure more dearly and passionately than ever one person felt towards another, the Cinema that has over the years become the chief joy and driving force of my life. The Cinema, my lover, permitted this atrocity to be made, and I have seen my lover in the most abysmal act of violation. This movie is heinous, shrieking and ugly and tedious and soft-headed, not even giving the thin comfort of being hilariously bad.

Here is a fact to ice over the soul: there will, of a certainty, be a Transformers 3. The end of this film and the ticket sales it will surely enjoy guarantee this. At least we can cling to the comfort that Transformers 3 will be better than Revenge of the Fallen. I had the same hopes going into this one, of course, but here's how I know that I'm right going into 2012: any film worse than Revenge of the Fallen could probably not be legally screened under the strictures of the Geneva Convention.

1/10

10 comments:

  1. The fact that this movie made over $60 million on Tuesday night and Wednesday alone makes me weep for the future of the human race.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I always futilely ask myself, Why? WHY do people go to see movies like this, that they KNOW will suck? What masochistic impulse leads to this? Aren't you aware that if you all STOPPED DOING THIS, they wouldn't make movies like this anymore? Argh.

    Still, it's almost worth it if their existence leads to qualify eviscerations like this one. Very nice.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There's some merit to the idea of giant robots fighting each other. In fact, I'm a sucker for giant robots fighting each other. And when the giant robots actually fought each other, I had a lot of fun, but the rest of the movie was such a goddamn trainwreck.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You know what the problem of all this is? Bay didn't make a film about exploring any themes or characters, so every moment that isn't pure over-exposition is shite comedy.

    And I'm surprised to see you say so little about the racism in the film, because everything else was so bad it really stood out as a slap in the face. It's not just the Italian toy truck that humps Fox's leg or the two minstrelbots: there's that totally unnecesary shot of the old Asian clueless to the fight behind him, the Napoleonic Arab who talks that silly language of theirs in a silly voice! Comedy! Oh, and John Turturro, a Jew, now works in a deli with his shrew of a mother. You were in Do the Right fucking Thing, John!

    I've never been more at odds with an audience in my laugh. I thought they were going to pee themselves over the hilarious racism and they cheered all the time even though you can't tell what's going on. The action scenes are all blurry, neon vomit. This film had four editors? Do any of them have opposable thumbs, or did they all have to work together just to feed the film into the machine?

    I know it's a film about toys, but Bay didn't make a film about Transformers, he made one about Rock 'Em Sock 'Em Robots.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The fact that he co-produced Flags of Our Fathers plus Letters from Iwo Jima doesn't really outweigh Spielberg's money-grubbing involvement with these two (soon three) pathetic, insulting robot movies. It's Episode I all over again; he and his cronies are teaching my kid brother bad film-going habits and hence a distorted view of reality. Oh, and he won that oscar because it was a holocaust movie (a trend that's likely to continue; The Reader, anyone?). F U very much, Mr. Spielberg.

    Not to sound hypocritical, I stand by my previous defense of Abrams. Consider what trickles down from his spy efforts: life is harsh, work can affect your relationships. They do stand on the same ground in the sci-fi territory, ideologically speaking, though, granted, not artistically.

    These films inform the mind more so than any good-natured art house film can. Spielberg is more influential sociologically than most people realize and it's high time he takes some goddam responsibility for his legacy as a social voice. And Animaniacs was too long ago.

    Bay made a single good movie in his life, namely The Rock.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Still, it's almost worth it if their existence leads to qualify eviscerations like this one. Very nice."

    -- please tell me you aren't serious with this ? please tell me you aren't this deperate to prove to the world how "smart" you think you are ? You are comical and pathetic all rolled into one lump of....

    ReplyDelete
  7. GeoX: "I always futilely ask myself, Why? WHY do people go to see movies like this, that they KNOW will suck?"

    I think the answer is very easy: they don't think it sucks. You're seeing it from your point of view only. They like it. Jake's post also suggests that. Otherwise they wouldn't buy the dvd too, and the first one was one of the best-sellers. Relax, man, what are you going to do.
    I confess I enjoyed the first one. I enjoyed the comedy and the characters. The final battle is a mess, yes. It's a half-hour motion-blur-fest. I didn't like much the design of the robots either, I agree with Tim on that.
    I'll probably won't bother watching this one but who knows.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "I have come to think, in fact, that it is Michael Bay's worst movie ever, just barely noodging out The Island, although it ought to be mentioned that I have not seen Pearl Harbor,"

    So you think "Bad boys 2" is better than "The island"?
    Oh well, so many kinds of atrocious to choose from with Michael Bay...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bumping this from years back, because oh dear god there is a 4th one coming this summer, and I am putting in a preemptive request for the blockbuster history to finally be Transformers: The Movie. You know, the animated toy selling one. Come on, you know it's the best Transformers movie thus far.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I wish to comment again here also, just to have it on the record that I am HAUNTED BY BAFFLEMENT over the comment from "Pop," who hates me because...not sure why, actually, and that's the whole problem. Maybe because for some inscrutable reason, he thinks that using the word "eviscerate" is showing off? It's really a great unsolved mystery.

    ReplyDelete

Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.

Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.