20 September 2014

HOLLYWOOD CENTURY, 1978: In which you're the one that I want (you are the one I want), you-hoo-hoo, honey

Grease is a movie with a very specific, idiosyncratic, and telling pedigree: it was the highest-grossing film of the year immediately following Star Wars. And in that year, it spent 15 non-consecutive weekends as the #1 film at the U.S. domestic box office. Which was, for what it's worth, five weekends more than Star Wars itself had managed in its first release.

It's easy to overstate the impact that Star Wars had on the development of American popular filmmaking, but it's equally easy to over-rely on sentences beginning "it's easy to overstate...". It certainly cemented a few things that we can immediately see playing out in Grease, which otherwise resembles the space picture not at all: it was the ultimate Event Picture That You Had To See, the culmination of a process that The Godfather, The Exorcist and Jaws had all furthered; and certainly the extraordinarily sustained run Grease enjoyed as the biggest film in the country suggests that it enjoyed that status. Star Wars also ignited, though I do not know if it was immediately recognised at the time, the economic trend by which the tastes of teenagers (boy teenagers, generally, though that wouldn't seem to apply to Grease so much) dictate what gets made for everybody. And Grease is a great big ol' high school movie, one that is presumably driven by nostalgia for the 1950s, but is so conspicuously contemporary in its attitudes, tastes, and style that it seems to be mocking that decade far more than it panders to the presumptive audience's memories of the time.

It is tempting to the point that I cannot ignore it to compare the film with American Graffiti, for they serve to bracket a certain important period in the American cinema: the 1973 film was released in the most glorious peak of the New Hollywood, while 1978 finds us in the first year of that movement's symbolic death (about which we'll have a great deal to say later). And despite how much more American Graffiti openly pines for the days it depicts, seeing in them a warm glow of "we were so much more innocent!" while Grease snottily decrees "hell no, we weren't, we just couldn't talk about it in mixed company", American Graffiti ends up being the far more sober and grown-up work, capping its fuzzy nostaligia with a gut punch in which one of its four protagonists is dead, one is MIA in Vietnam, one is dodging the draft in Canada, and worst of all, one sells insurance in Modesto. It's a sudden, merciless nod to the realities of history and maturation that defies the simple pleasures the film has apparently been peddling. Whereas Grease, after its sarcasm and filthy-minded subversion of '50s pop culture have wrapped up, rather genteelly suggests that cute young hetero couples are just so golly-darn cute, and aren't we all happy? Listen to how happy everybody is as they sing!

And this itself speaks to the huge gap between 1973 and 1978 in film: Star Wars had come along after eleven of the harshest years of American history and art in history, years marked by war, political conspiracy, failed cultural revolutions, and a general lack of accountability for virtually anybody responsible for making things shitty, and it had presented an easily accessible story about how clear-cut good guys could win the day against clear-cut bad guys with virtually no personal losses or repercussions. After years of cinematic anti-heroes, ambivalent half-victories, and serious engagement with human ugliness, a huge, successful, beloved movie had suddenly been fun. And fun would only become more and more of a mainstay in the top echelons of pop cinema, a trend that arguably wasn't even challenged until 2008's The Dark Knight.

Grease is, whatever its other limitations, unambiguously and unrelentingly fun. It's a frivolous "mismatched teens fall in love" comedy regularly punctuated by bubbly songs that are easy to sing along to after you've heard them even just once, starring John Travolta and Olivia Newton-John at the height of their popularity (though hers was in music, not film): and unlike Travolta's other big musical that year (Saturday Night Fever, a 1977 release that did most of its impressive box-office in '78), it acknowledges human ugliness only to gloss over it. One character gets a big dramatic musical number solely to demonstrate her fortitude and terror at the thought of being pregnant, a subplot that gets dismissed two scenes later with an idle "nope, never mind! tee-hee!", and that's about it as far as anything truly dramatic or sordid goes.

Outside of the fact that the musical genre had been on the outs for years prior to Saturday Night Fever (Robert Stigwood, producer of that movie and this, would quickly overplay his hand, shepherding the outlandishly bad Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band into theaters just over a month after Grease and effectively re-killing the genre), the reasons that Grease would be a big hit are easy enough to see: pretty people in a likable story with earwormy songs is a pretty hard formula to bet against. Other than, again, the musical thing, it's not even impossible to imagine a version of Grease being equally huge in the modern day (it's kind of like a funnier, real-world Twilight). The biggest barrier to its success, and one that ended up not mattering more to this film than to any number of its successors, is that Grease isn't very good: out-and-out bad, in some ways, though mostly it's a satisfactory execution of a concept that had to serve too many masters to ever work successfully.

The biggest problem, easily, is that Jim Jacobs & Warren Casey's 1971 stage musical, a pastiche of '50s pop styles, was crudely remolded into a pop star vehicle for Newton-John, leaving it without any kind of consistent musical identity. Right from the very start, when we hear Frankie Valli singing the title song newly composed by Barry Gibb (undoubtedly on the strength of Gibb's work on the Saturday Night Fever soundtrack), and we enter the disco era without even the most modest, surface-level attempt to anchor the film in anything resembling the '50s; even more perplexingly, the song plays out over animated credits that take all their aesthetic cues from the underground comics of the late '60s, giving us a film that, by the five-minute mark, has already split its loyalties between three entirely incompatible periods in American pop culture history. The '60s, at least, never return: from here on out, it's a duel for supremacy between Jacobs/Casey material like "Summer Days" and "Look At Me, I'm Sandra Dee" on the one hand, and originals by Newton-John's guy, John Farrar, "Hopelessly Devoted to You" and "You're the One That I Want". And they are fine Olivia Newton-John singles; but they are clamorous, weird intrusions into Grease, even if "You're the One That I Want" is almost inarguably the most living, energetic sonic moment in the entire feature.

The other, in some ways littler problems, are numerous. There are the visibly ancient "high schoolers" (Travolta, at 24, was the baby; Stockard Channing, as the head "bad girl with a heart of gold" Rizzo, was 34 and looked every day of it), breaking the film's reality beyond the point that it's even slightly fair to expect us to compensate for it. There's the ugly morality of a climax that demands the female lead to transform into a heightened parody of sexually loose femininity, while letting the male lead off the hook for making a similar change almost in the same instant that he makes it. There's the wildly uneven sound mixing, most apparent whenever Channing sings, sounding like she has been abruptly tossed into a styrofoam box with a microphone: "Sandra Dee" is, legitimately, one of the worst-sounding numbers in any major film musical outside of those rocky years during the transition to sound.

And there, most dispiritingly of all, no real energy. Director Randal Kleiser made his leap from TV with this film, but that's not really the problem: he and cinematographer Bill Butler do perfectly fine work keeping the lighting, framing, and focus complex enough that the widescreen frame seems to be completely inhabited in ways that side-step all the usual pitfalls of TV-to-movie evolution. The greater issue is that he frequently doesn't seem to have any sense of where to put the camera in the first place, or what to do with the people in front of it. Virtually all of the songs taken from the show are staged with a theatrical flatness that assumes a proscenium stage, and the camera very frequently fails to respect this: the "let's build a fancy car so we can get laid" number "Greased Lightning" is an especially galling example, with Travolta's Danny and his gang, the T-Birds, striking poses for, and singing to an audience that very frequently does not seem to exist. The choreography doesn't involve the camera, it happens almost in despite of the camera, and this is deadly for cinematic musicals. The original numbers fare hardly better: "You're the One That I Want" has musical enefrgy to spare, and it's staged half in a carnival funhouse, and there's not one single dance move that explicitly takes advantage of the sliding, slanting, floors of that environment, not even when Travolta and Newton-John are walking down steps that, in every other funhouse I've ever seen, were moving back and forth in opposite directions. And God knows what's up with the big school dance competition, a mystifying slurry of odd cutting and weird gags.

The characters fare no better than the dancing. It cannot be a coincidence that the most sure-footed and lively performances are from two of the old Hollywood pros carted in, Joan Blondell and Eve Arden as a tart waitress and humorless school principal, respectively (Arden's reaction shots are, easily, the best thing in the film). For the most part, they could just go out and do. The people who have to be guided - that is, the leads, non-actor Newton-John especially - are simply stuck with whatever beats they start pursuing in any given scene, lacking consistent across the film, and in Travolta's case, indulging himself in some really odd facial expressions and line deliveries where it sounds like he's adding vowels and voiced Hs all over the place. Channing deserved combat pay and a Medal of Honor for managing to be so sharp and snarky and electrifying as the sarcastic slut Rizzo; she is leagues ahead of any other "teen" in the film, creating a sustained, hugely likable character whose travails become generally captivating while the generic "will they stick together, or will she ever get disgusted by his little hypocrisies and petty judgments come on, why is this sexist-ass plot the only part of the film that's not aware it's the 1970s out there?" storyline between the main lovers plays out with no speck of originality or implication that actually this couple is really special and has actual, discernible sexual charisma.

It is, all told, anonymous and semi-competent filmmaking with no real personality, pepped up by the fake energy it imports by having catchy but not exactly great songs. I cannot in fairness call it "bad", but even less are there more than a few incidental moments (part of the "dancing on the bleachers" phase of "Summer Nights", the staging of a car race, Frankie Avalon's meta-narratively delightful cameo) that I am even temporarily tempted to call "good". It's safe, broadly appealing but equally generic filmmaking that just happened to hit a huge chord with the right people at the right time that it earned an enormous pile of money totally incommensurate with its quality. And so we enter the modern era of the Hollywood film.

Elsewhere in American cinema in 1978
-The first of the self-conscious post-Star Wars blockbusters, Superman makes us believe a man can fly
-John Carpenter's Halloween makes us believe that dazzling profits can be made by killing slutty babysitters and letting virginal babysitters live
-Every Which Way But Loose makes us believe that Clint Eastwood and that orangutan are, like, actually buddies, man

Elsewhere in world cinema in 1978
-Bergman (Ingmar) meets Bergman (Ingrid) for the first and only time in the beautiful harsh Swedish family drama Autumn Sonata
-Ermanno Olmi wins the Palme d'Or for his epic of 19th Century Lombard peasants, The Tree of Wooden Clogs
-Martin Rosen makes Watership Down in Great Britain, widely acclaimed as one of the most horrifying, nightmare-inducing animated children's films in history

31 comments:

  1. As someone who cares deeply about musical theatre with actual good songs and also gender politics that aren't horrifying, oh how I hate GREASE. (Also, it's a dreadful influence on children.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've never liked this film and the fact that my school used to stage it as their annual production every other year didn't help. I do love 'There Are Worse Things I Could Do' though - fools you into thinking you're watching an emotionally engaging one woman show for a split second.

    Watership Down! Notorious for being the most distressing U certificate film ever released, and most surprisingly never raised to a PG despite the various opportunities to do so and the now popular trend of the BBFC to revise old ratings. It really is a case of, "Woah they're Little Timothy. Careful now. Bad things happen in this film."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Grease 2 was infinitely more entertaining.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Never understood the enduring popularity of this film. The actors are all WAY too old to be playing teens, the story is crazy sexist(she wins Travolta's heart by selling out and dressing like a whore), and the soundtrack is all over the damn place, with mock-'50s tunes sitting uneasy with anachronistic disco thumpers and country pop ballads. The jokes are all juvenile, the choregraphy isn't even good. Hell, the sound mixing is bad too, with the vocals way too high.

    When I saw this as a younger, angrier, more pretentious and cynical man(think 2005-2006 Tim Brayton), I just brushed the whole damn Musical genre off as trash if this was one of the heights. Later I would discover Cabaret and All That Jazz and be hilariously wrong, of course.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As large as it was in the US, it was a fucking revolution in the UK, where the soundtrack was number one for 13 consecutive weeks. Consecutive! 'Summer Nights' and 'You're the One That I Want' are still in the Top 20 all-time best selling singles. It's sheer craziness! It's rerun on television at a not-infrequent basis, and it was named the best musical of all time by a public poll a few years ago over here.

    Speaking entirely from my own experience, seeing at a young age certainly helped to embed it deep into my subconscious, even if I've only seen it once fully through (as opposed to bits and pieces on TV). Without having to look them up, I could probably recite a large chunk of 'Summer Nights' lyrics, the amount they've been bombarded into my brain.

    That being said, maybe it's the cultural bombardment, but I kinda don't hate it as much as I should for all the reasons pointed out above, which I completely agree with. Maybe it's just Stockholm Syndrome with the rest of the UK...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Tim, where's your Star Wars review? Please say you're not skipping it/

    ReplyDelete
  7. I only very vaguely remember Watership Down the movie, but the fact that it's pretty intense in parts certainly wouldn't come as any surprise to readers of Watership Down the book (and can't we have a cultural consensus that it's a fucking marvelous book, if we can about anything?), which has a number of indelibly scarring moments itself.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I can't bring myself to look past the age of the cast. The cast makes it so that instead of "teenagers being teenagers," it's just a bunch of people being kind of remarkably and unsympathetically dumb.

    Also, aren't all H sounds in American English voiceless? Voiced glottal fricatives don't really come up.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What is not mentioned is that Hollywood discovered the cash cow for nostalgia. Baby Boomers love being reminded they are special and nothing brought them to their comfort zone more than being told their decade was the happiest and most idyllic in the history of mankind.

    American Graffiti may have begun as Lucas's simple paean to the cars he loved as a child, but the soundtrack is what pricked Lew Wasserman's up. Grease was the next step.

    The Eighties brought the canard that the 1960s were America's heyday of political activism and correct thinking. And we are served up the odious hydra known as The Big Chill.

    In the Nineties, we got Dazed and Confused. Though I'd argue this wasn't an attempt by the studios to cash in.

    We are already being served up nostalgia for the Eighties and Nineties.

    It is like the minute twenty-years pass, the execs all say, "OK, buy up some songs and knock out a script. I want some of this nostalgia stuff. The kids are in their 20s now and lamenting their childhoods are over."

    ReplyDelete
  10. Something about this movie always felt so tired and stale to me. I don't see how some people can view it as a classic. For the reasons Tim provides, it doesn't feel like any real attempt to recapture the 50s. More like some adults from the 70s decided to play dress-up for a few hours and wink at the corniness of going to the "sock hop" and other 50s relics. "Jesus Christ Superstar," oddly enough, does this sort of thing better: letting the audience know that they aren't witnessing an exact period recreation, while making the audience feel like they're there nonetheless.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I've always thought the "sexist" accusations against Grease are way overstated - IMO, the "hypocrisies and petty judgments" go both ways between the leads, and Sandy's attire at the end is nothing more than her telling Danny that she's at least willing to meet him partway, after he's already done the same. Unless you think she's going to be ratting her hair and wearing spandex every day from then on.
    And I think Tim has undersold one of the movie's huge pluses - and that's the sheer charisma of Travolta's performance. This IMO is the film you show anyone who wonders why he was considered a big deal back in the day, much more so than Saturday Night Fever, where the dance scenes have been parodied so often that it's dulled their impact a bit.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I love how you mention Watership Down. Even though the animation quality doesn't stand up to Disney of the '70s, (which is actually a rather easy barrier to clear by modern standards), the epic story that was expertly adapted from the source novel more than makes up for the shortfalls in animation. I adore that film, just as much as I adore the novel.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "...the 1973 film was released in the most glorious peak of the New Hollywood, while 1978 finds us in the first year of that movement's symbolic death"

    "And so we enter the modern era of the Hollywood film."

    Hooray!

    ...we have dissimilar tastes. (Except we both like American Graffiti.)

    ReplyDelete
  14. This has been my sister's favorite film ever since she was seven. I've thus seen it dozens of times in part or in full and it's become such a fixture to me that I've never even thought of trying to determine whether it's objectively a good or a bad film. Even though I've of course noticed most of the shortcomings Tim mentions, they've never added up to "yeah, this is pretty bad", even though they probably should.

    ReplyDelete
  15. So much interesting conversation happening here, and yet the one thing I'm stuck on is "I can't believe I put 'unvoiced Hs' when I meant 'voiced Hs'". Fixed, carry on everyone!

    ReplyDelete
  16. P.S. to Jackie: as came up in some comment thread or another, I'm going to cover Star Wars as a franchise in the run-up to Episode VII.

    ReplyDelete
  17. So much hate for this film! And yet, I cannot really bring myself to dislike it, rancid gender politics and all, because it does the one right thing for a musical:

    Make the last song the best and far and away the catchiest. Everyone leaves the movie not thinking about acting or the ages or the little hat-tip to fucking rape in Summer Nights, but instead whistling You're the One That I Want. Which still distracts me from everything else whenever I watch this movie.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I acknowledge nearly all the criticisms presented in both the review and the comments, and I don't fucking care. I love the movie. I love love love the movie.

    And no mention of the fucking amazing Hand Jive/Dance Contest scene? For shame.

    Also, Not Fenimore is like me and stops the movie before the actual last song! (It's "We Go Together" which is just fucking terrible.)

    ReplyDelete
  19. About sound mixes and home video- it’s getting increasingly difficult to judge the aesthetic quality of a given movie’s sound mix based on the version(s) that have made their way to home video. Anybody remember the controversy surrounding the first multichannel sound remix of “Jaws” (a movie that was only ever released theatrically with a mono mix)? All new sound effects, foley, ambient and crowd sounds etc. Purists were up in arms about it. (Because of this, the mix was completely scrapped and redone for the Bluray release, by people who knew what they were doing, had access to the original elements, and with Spielberg’s blessing.)
    Often, these “restored” sound mixes happen without any input at all from the creatives involved with the original production.
    Somewhere down the line, someone thought it would be a great idea to create a multichannel sound mix for “The Rocky Horror Picture Show” for its release on VHS, pulling songs that were released in stereo on the soundtrack album and laying them over the movie scenes. But a song mixed for use in a movie sequence and one mixed for a commercial album are two different animals. “Rocky Horror” had different orchestrations, and sometimes used alternate vocal performances by the actors, and when laid over the film scenes, had all kinds of ambient wonkiness, not to mention lip-synch issues where the version the actor synched to on set is not the version playing on the soundtrack, making the original sound mixers (or the actors) look completely incompetent.

    A friend of mine produced the DVD release of “Rocky Horror”, and we were talking about it one day when he was starting on it. I mentioned the horrible multichannel mix, and how the movie was only ever released in mono, and that’s the actual, “official” sound mix. He didn’t know any of this, so he hunted down the mono mix and made sure it ended up on the DVD as an audio option.

    ReplyDelete
  20. All of which is to say that I’m pretty sure “Grease” has had its sound mix tampered with (i.e. “restored and remastered”). It’s been years since I’ve watched a film print of the movie, but my first reaction when I watched it on DVD was “Holy crap, this thing has been digitally processed out the wazoo!” It’s especially bad on “Grease”, “Summer Nights”, and “You’re the One that I Want” (and “Look at Me, I’m Sandra Dee”, as Tim mentioned). “Grease” is a bit of a different case because it was originally mixed for 6-track Dolby Stereo release prints. But even so, the original mix didn’t have reverb on vocals during numbers that were filmed outside. Ugh.
    If we’re going to judge the sound mix, and there are no film prints from 1978 available, probably the best thing to do is hunt down one of the first releases on VHS, before home video producers started remixing Hollywood films.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Rick speaks an important truth. I'm actually a bit embarrassed that I just plowed right on through without thinking to acknowledge these complexities. But oh! how I do remember that Jaws controversy well.

    ReplyDelete
  22. With all this talk about the end of the New Hollywood, I wonder if 1980 is going to be THAT movie?

    ReplyDelete
  23. @Damian- If there's a god in heaven.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Just for shits and giggles, I hunted down a couple clips from "Rocky Horror".

    Here's the original mono track for "Time Warp". Granted, it's a bit muffled here and is much cleaner on the DVD, but you can still get the idea. This is the actual movie sound mix.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sg-vgGuTD8A

    And here's the same scene with the "remastered" multichannel remix. Pay attention to the vocal chorus in particular. It sounds nothing like the original track.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdbLirsZ_4Q

    ReplyDelete
  25. I'm so glad Tim mentioned the weird editing during "Greased Lightning" because it is so VERY FUCKING WEIRD.
    One moment we're facing the cast and their performing TO us, the next cut...and now we're off to the side....observing the cast performing the song......to some other audience who's.....not us.

    It's distracting as all hell and I can't believe a professional editor let that in.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Somewhat off-topic, but after the bizarrely awful mono mix on the Halloween 35th Anniversary Blu-ray last year (it appears, for all the world, that someone took the new 7.1 audio track and mixed it back down to mono for... Fuck if I know) the upcoming Halloween Complete Collection blu-ray box set (out this upcoming Tuesday) is supposed to have the corrected original mono on it.

    That, coupled with the Dean Cundey video restoration of the film (the color is finally something close to right on home video!) has me insanely excited for that box set (along with the Producers Cut of Curse...)

    ReplyDelete
  27. Rick & Damian- One of the half-dozen or so that came inked-in on the schedule when I started planning it.

    We're talking about Any Which Way You Can, right?

    Brian- REALLY? Holy shit, that went from "eh, maybe if the price drops a lot" to "as soon as I possibly can justify the expense" in record speed.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Like I said, "supposed to." I'll let you know for sure in a few days.

    ReplyDelete
  29. It's worth noting that the "Cundey-approved transfer" in the new set is the same one from last year's 35th Anniversary blu-ray, which I haven't seen firsthand but from the stills on blu-ray.com actually looks fairly muted, and not much at all like the vivid oranges and blues I've heard described in the theatrical release (which, again, I haven't seen, mind).

    Still, there's more than enough else in the set to have me salivating.

    ReplyDelete
  30. It's not perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better than than the 2007 release.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Rick, thanks for the info and those Rocky Horror comparison clips. Really fascinating stuff.

    ReplyDelete

Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.

Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.