01 October 2014
MR. VENGEANCE
If nothing else, The Equalizer wins my respect - a form of it, anyway - for how committed it is to being itself. Denzel Washington plays a man with a very particular set of skills who decides to start pushing back against injustice and exploitation by unflinchingly engaging in acts of bloody, bloody violence; well, then, that is all there is to be said on the matter, and that is the movie we will get, for 132 minutes of almost uninterrupted severity. Within the first minute of the film, there's a shot of a measuring cup full of blueberries for a morning smoothie, shot in an extreme close-up that makes those blueberries look, by God, like the most angry, menacing, intense berries that ever stormed their way off a bush and into a man's belly. And from that point on, there's very little doubt that The Equalizer shall see fit to eschew any thing resembling irony or detachment.
Washington plays Robert McCall, a man with a mysterious and deliberately cryptic past that we first only know involves a dead wife. And while it's not very difficult to suss out the general shape, if not all the particular details, of what happened to him before he ended up hiding out in a shabby Boston diner reading books, drinking tea, and acting as a mentor to weary teenage prostitute Alina (Chloƫ Grace Moretz), the film resists confirming even the things we understand pretty early and pretty intuitively until deep, deep into the running time. Which does a lot of things, some good (it staves off the exposition dump until a place where it gets to feel natural and implied), and at least one that's not good at all, which is that by defining McCall in terms of the identity that we're not privy to, he's always kept at an enormous emotional remove from the audience. And no matter how many books he's reading whose content oh-so-conveniently maps onto the themes of that part of the story, the film can't cheat its way into making him seem like a real psychological presence for us to cling to. I would compare it to something like Taken, a film which The Equalizer resembles in a number of small but useful ways, we're told enough about Liam Neeson's character that we get to feel like we're right there along with him every step of the way; The Equalizer makes it so clear that Washington's character knows more than we do about everything, he almost doesn't feel human.
The result is a film where one tends to watch the protagonist rather more than one roots for him, which isn't necessarily a problem. It gives The Equalizer the feeling of a procedural, almost, except instead of watching cops or doctors go about the business of copping or doctoring, we're watching someone outside any kind of system use his very obsessive, detail-oriented worldview (the film alludes to McCall having OCD without emphasising it, or doing a whole hell of a lot with it) and impeccable physical skills go through the business of ruthlessly and calmly exterminating what feels like dozens of Russian gangsters by the time it's all over. The film has a clinical remove from the action that serves it well: for the film also has enough lingering moments of extreme and outrageous violence that it wouldn't take much tinkering to push it into the realm of torture porn (the finale takes place at an off-brand Home Depot analogue, and the filmmakers make full creative use of the whole range of tools and building equipment available in a big box construction store). But because director Antoine Fuqua always keeps the violence two steps away - as robotically considered by McCall, whom we are always kept arm's length away from - it never feels especially exploitative or disgusting for the sake of it. Though I'd still warn anybody away from the film who has a weak stomach for evocative gore effects (frankly, The Equalizer serves as the latest proof that big-budget movies apparently can't go far enough to snag a rating of NC-17 for violence).
This makes for a somewhat different experience than the usual "Denzel is a slightly scary bad-ass" routine (of the sort Fuqua has already done with 2001's Training Day, which did much to concrete the formula into place), with both more brutality and less glee in its brutality than is common to the violent action movie. And that makes it kind of interesting as a genre exercise, though it's not equally interesting as a film unto itself; for one thing, it's much, much too long and unfocused, with subplots that all seem to suggest that McCall's initial act of retributive mercy for his little prostitute buddy has triggered within him has turned him into a kind of modern knight errant, helping to even the odds for people who can't fight the broken, corrupt world on their own (this was the thrust of the '80s TV show which the film adapts). Which is lovely and all, but it adds a lot of fat to a movie that surely does act, and look, and sound like it should be lean and wiry and propulsive. Instead, we get tens of minutes of McCall tracking down the dirty cops who torched the taqueria own by the mother of his overweight co-worker Ralphie (Johnny Skourtis). Not tens of minutes, in fairness. But too damn many minutes that take away from the matter of Russian gangsters and the dead-eyed psychopath Teddy (Marton Csokas) who has come to Boston to find and eliminate the vigilante causing such problems for the mob's call girl ring. The film never builds momentum as a result, and when a 132-minute film about Denzel Washington finding imaginative ways to kill bad guys with a sorrowful expression on his face, a lack of momentum is deadly.
There's some fun stylistic flourishes (the process by which McCall takes note of his surroundings and plans his attack uses the same flashing, speed-ramping that Guy Ritchie's Sherlock Holmes used for the same purpose, but in a calmer, more aesthetically tethered way), and Washington's wise gravitas and sense of real disappointment in himself and his targets as he kills them almost qualifies as nuanced morality and character-building by the standards of the genre we're looking at. But the film as a whole is a bit lead-footed and a lot misshapen, and it can't split the difference between scenes of McCall spying and planning vs. McCall killing people excessively in a way that makes any of it seem very exciting or pleasurable to watch. As with Neeson, there's a fairly high bottom level that these films of Washington being hard and violent can reach, in terms of professionalism and actorly presence, but The Equalizer doesn't do much to rise above that minimum.
5/10
Washington plays Robert McCall, a man with a mysterious and deliberately cryptic past that we first only know involves a dead wife. And while it's not very difficult to suss out the general shape, if not all the particular details, of what happened to him before he ended up hiding out in a shabby Boston diner reading books, drinking tea, and acting as a mentor to weary teenage prostitute Alina (Chloƫ Grace Moretz), the film resists confirming even the things we understand pretty early and pretty intuitively until deep, deep into the running time. Which does a lot of things, some good (it staves off the exposition dump until a place where it gets to feel natural and implied), and at least one that's not good at all, which is that by defining McCall in terms of the identity that we're not privy to, he's always kept at an enormous emotional remove from the audience. And no matter how many books he's reading whose content oh-so-conveniently maps onto the themes of that part of the story, the film can't cheat its way into making him seem like a real psychological presence for us to cling to. I would compare it to something like Taken, a film which The Equalizer resembles in a number of small but useful ways, we're told enough about Liam Neeson's character that we get to feel like we're right there along with him every step of the way; The Equalizer makes it so clear that Washington's character knows more than we do about everything, he almost doesn't feel human.
The result is a film where one tends to watch the protagonist rather more than one roots for him, which isn't necessarily a problem. It gives The Equalizer the feeling of a procedural, almost, except instead of watching cops or doctors go about the business of copping or doctoring, we're watching someone outside any kind of system use his very obsessive, detail-oriented worldview (the film alludes to McCall having OCD without emphasising it, or doing a whole hell of a lot with it) and impeccable physical skills go through the business of ruthlessly and calmly exterminating what feels like dozens of Russian gangsters by the time it's all over. The film has a clinical remove from the action that serves it well: for the film also has enough lingering moments of extreme and outrageous violence that it wouldn't take much tinkering to push it into the realm of torture porn (the finale takes place at an off-brand Home Depot analogue, and the filmmakers make full creative use of the whole range of tools and building equipment available in a big box construction store). But because director Antoine Fuqua always keeps the violence two steps away - as robotically considered by McCall, whom we are always kept arm's length away from - it never feels especially exploitative or disgusting for the sake of it. Though I'd still warn anybody away from the film who has a weak stomach for evocative gore effects (frankly, The Equalizer serves as the latest proof that big-budget movies apparently can't go far enough to snag a rating of NC-17 for violence).
This makes for a somewhat different experience than the usual "Denzel is a slightly scary bad-ass" routine (of the sort Fuqua has already done with 2001's Training Day, which did much to concrete the formula into place), with both more brutality and less glee in its brutality than is common to the violent action movie. And that makes it kind of interesting as a genre exercise, though it's not equally interesting as a film unto itself; for one thing, it's much, much too long and unfocused, with subplots that all seem to suggest that McCall's initial act of retributive mercy for his little prostitute buddy has triggered within him has turned him into a kind of modern knight errant, helping to even the odds for people who can't fight the broken, corrupt world on their own (this was the thrust of the '80s TV show which the film adapts). Which is lovely and all, but it adds a lot of fat to a movie that surely does act, and look, and sound like it should be lean and wiry and propulsive. Instead, we get tens of minutes of McCall tracking down the dirty cops who torched the taqueria own by the mother of his overweight co-worker Ralphie (Johnny Skourtis). Not tens of minutes, in fairness. But too damn many minutes that take away from the matter of Russian gangsters and the dead-eyed psychopath Teddy (Marton Csokas) who has come to Boston to find and eliminate the vigilante causing such problems for the mob's call girl ring. The film never builds momentum as a result, and when a 132-minute film about Denzel Washington finding imaginative ways to kill bad guys with a sorrowful expression on his face, a lack of momentum is deadly.
There's some fun stylistic flourishes (the process by which McCall takes note of his surroundings and plans his attack uses the same flashing, speed-ramping that Guy Ritchie's Sherlock Holmes used for the same purpose, but in a calmer, more aesthetically tethered way), and Washington's wise gravitas and sense of real disappointment in himself and his targets as he kills them almost qualifies as nuanced morality and character-building by the standards of the genre we're looking at. But the film as a whole is a bit lead-footed and a lot misshapen, and it can't split the difference between scenes of McCall spying and planning vs. McCall killing people excessively in a way that makes any of it seem very exciting or pleasurable to watch. As with Neeson, there's a fairly high bottom level that these films of Washington being hard and violent can reach, in terms of professionalism and actorly presence, but The Equalizer doesn't do much to rise above that minimum.
5/10
9 comments:
Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.
Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.
Russian gangsters! How original. So this movie is essentially a collection of cliches lifted from movies like Taken and self-plagiarism by the lead character.
ReplyDeleteAfter what felt like a mostly positive review, albeit the damning-with-faint-praise kind, I'm surprised to see a rating as low as 5/10.
ReplyDeleteAlso, were they deliberately trying to trick people into thinking it was a Sin City spin-off with that poster?
Ah, y'know, number ratings. I had 6, it felt too generous, I put 5, it felt a touch harsh, and I figured, it's not like anybody's going to care a week from now.
ReplyDelete"frankly, The Equalizer serves as the latest proof that big-budget movies apparently can't go far enough to snag a rating of NC-17 for violence"
ReplyDeleteIt actually got a 15 certificate from the BBFC this side of the pond. I haven't seen the movie, but I have noticed a trend over the past several years of the threshold for violence requiring higher ratings gradually creeping upwards (for domestic releases, anyway. Foreign pictures seem to get hit with the 18 certificate much more liberally).
@Thrash Til' Death
ReplyDeleteIn the BBFC's defence (not that I make a point of defending other people telling us what we can and can't watch) they did advise on cuts for violence to secure the desired 15 certificate at the customary precuts stage. You know the routine - where family values cuts a deal with crafty capitalism. We'll doubless be treated to the 18 certificate Blu-Ray later.
As for what was going on with an uncut 15 for Schwarzenegger's Sabotage - eh, fuck knows. The consensus was that it was ludicrously violent.
I dunno, The Equalizer's far and away not the movie I'd use to make the "why is NC-17 only for sex?" point. It was almost too tame (and definitely too dour) about its violence. It's also possible that while I'm sympathetic to the argument, I also suggest that pretty much everybody has more visceral, emotional, and conflicted reactions to cinematic sexuality (especially unsimulated) than they do to violence (which is, of course, all simulated). I mean, which would you rather watch with a group, The Equalizer or Shortbus? The Raid or Antichrist? Saw or actual pornography?
ReplyDeleteAnyway, Tim couldn't have known, but he should've waited for Gone Girl, which is pretty much an object lesson in what (and maybe who) the NC-17 rating isn't for!
I think some critics confused "what is indicated to have happened" with "what we are actually shown without cutting away" when it comes to the violence. True, we do get some closeups on some dying men that are nasty, but they're not worse than a Tarantino film, and those always get an R.
ReplyDeleteNot that I'm going to argue for the film as film. Not at all. I don't disagree with your rating, really.
I love movies like this, Taken, and the Bourne Everything, where a lone person runs around inflicting horrible violence on terrible people. I treasure no illusions about the actual cinematic quality of most of them, and my standards for them aren't tremendously high (they're not so low that I'll watch the straight-to-dvd Seagal movies, mind you).
I just want to viscerally enjoy fictional violence on the screen without being made to feel awful about it the way horror movies make me feel awful about it. If along the way I am pleasantly surprised at the things Denzel Washington can do with his face and body language, that's a very nice bonus.
I'll probably buy the dvd.
But postscript - can we find some different villains than just "foreigners that are easy targets because some of them steal our credit card numbers on the internet?" I know some Russians online and I'm frankly embarrassed if these movies come up in conversation.
ReplyDeleteI would certainly not die on the hill of "The Equalizer should be NC-17!" Not when the Saws exist. But since I put it out there, I'll clarify: it was the strangled to death by razor wire scene that, while I was watching it, just felt gratuitous and lingering and not okay.
ReplyDelete