16 May 2015
THE MAXIMUM FORCE OF THE FUTURE
Overhype is a deadly thing, and I don't want to contribute to it. So let's just leave it at this: if you're on the fence about Mad Max: Fury Road, I think you should see it. Go now, and do not be overhyped. If you're sticking around to find out why I think you should see it, one reason is because it's got some really lovely landscape photography of the Namib Desert, standing in for the post-apocalyptic Australian Outback. Another reason is because it's the best action movie since - if I'm trying really hard to be conservative - Hard Boiled in 1992. The second reason, I concede, is probably the more compelling one.
This is, maybe, the film that George Miller was born to make. Oh, sure, Mad Max 2, AKA The Road Warrior, is flawless, divine masterpiece, but it didn't cost a titanic sum of money. Fury Road did, and Miller and crew made every penny count to the utmost. This is what happens when you take a man who spent the early years of his career creating entirely new ways of doing action cinema on a shoestring, provide him with 30 years to think about what he wanted to do next, and then give him all the budget he could require to realise it. Seeing scrappy, ingenious filmmakers make a whole lot of practically nothing is inspiring and exciting, but seeing them make a whole lot out of a whole lot is absolutely mindblowing. And also inspiring - in an age when sums of money that could buy and sell whole nations are used to produce nice and safe popcorn movies that feel very much the same as a dozen other movies that cost equally as much, it's close to a sacred experience to stumble across a movie that wants to use all those limitless resources to do something that we have never, ever seen before in a movie, and which most of us, I'd wager, couldn't even have imagined in the first place.
The film has characters, and a plot - eerily fucking good characters, and a plot that gets all sinewy and dense when you start to pick at it - but mostly, it has an overwhelming, damn near unendurable sense of momentum (it's the most active, physical viewing experience I've had in a very long time, with the short lulls in the action invariably leading to a long slow release of breath and the relaxation of muscles I didn't realise I was tensing up). The film opens with a slow, steady shot of Max Rockatansky (Tom Hardy) staring off at the desert in what used to be Australia, intoning in ragged voice-over the minute amount of backstory selected from the first three Mad Max pictures we need in order to know what's going on - Max was a cop before the world ended, and now he's roaming the wasteland trying to survive and forget - and after he kills and eats a two-headed mutant lizard, he hops in his V-8 Interceptor and starts the engines. The one in the car, and the one in the movie, which immediately turns into a chase and does not cease to be one until its second-to-last scene, though there are variations in who is being chased by whom and for what reason vary from moment to moment, and there are pauses throughout the narrative when the people giving chase are far enough in the background that they're not an immediate concern.
The main object of the chase isn't Max himself, but Furiosa (Charlize Theron), an Imperator in the army of Immortan Joe (Hugh Keays-Byrne, whose colorful villain credentials include the psychopathic biker Toecutter back in the original Mad Max), leader of the Citadel. It's one of the three human outposts in those part - Gas Town and Bullet Farm are the others - centered on a warrior death cult that Joe has derived and made himself the center of; and among the seemingly inexhaustible charms of Fury Road, one that makes me happiest to contemplate is the developmental arc it continues to form with the original trilogy. The Road Warrior shows post-apocalyptic world where the brightest light of civilisation is a disorganised, survivalist community a step above hunting and gathering; by the time of Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome, humanity has rediscovered towns, economy, and a cursory form of government; and here in Fury Road, religion has re-asserted itself, with the hierarchy and ritual attendant on those things.
But back to Furiosa. For reasons of her own, which are teased out throughout the movie, she has agreed to smuggle out five of Joe's "wives" - "breeding slaves" is rather more to the point, but religious despots have the luxury of defining terms - and bring them to safety far to the east of the region. Max, having already been captured by Joe's pasty white "war boys", is dragged along by one particularly zealous soldier named Nux (Nicholas Hoult), currently relying on Max as a blood donor to replenish his mostly exsanguinated, corpselike body. So Max is right at the heart of the Furiosa hunt, not that he gives any kind of shit, and as soon as he, the Imperator, and her five charges find themselves the only apparent survivors of a freakishly huge sandstorm, he's willing to abandon them to their doom, as long as he can get the hell away on Furiosa's heavily-armored war rig, a beastly hybrid of a semi truck and God knows what else. The only problem being that without her, he can't operate it, and she's not moving anywhere without the women she's protecting. So Max reluctantly becomes one half of the superhuman team trying to escape the combined military power of all three settlements, along with the nomadic terrorists who guard the canyon that's the only way deeper into the east.
Simple, pure, and responsible for the most crazed, beautifully-conceived, flawlessly executed car stunts in... ever? Probably ever. Any attempt to describe what happens across most of Fury Road, the first English-language movie I have ever seen that's more than 50% action setpieces, would quickly turn into tedious recitation of "this cool thing happened, and then this cool thing happened". Any attempt to describe how the filmmakers carried it off would quite stymie me, because I don't know, and "probably a fucking wizard" isn't a real answer. But it's flawless action, edited by Margaret Sixel to perfectly emphasise continuity across a whirlwind of shots from every angle as literally dozens of vehicles tear through the Namibian sand, with a simply phenomenal sound mix calling attention to every different component of every vehicle, and to Junkie XL's raging drums-and-guitar score, which is as rousing and intensifying to the viewer as it is to the characters onscreen (I'm going to allow myself one "this cool thing" aside: the giant truck of drums and a flamethrower guitar, present to arouse the war boys into a heightened state of bloodlust, and cunningly woven in and out of the film's soundscape, is pure popcorn movie pop-art genius). The film starts from the most outrageous concepts for staging fights, and only gets more and more involved and seemingly physically impossible as it goes along, with second unit director and stunt coordinator Guy Norris flinging human bodies and elaborately over-designed cars and trucks around the screen like the juggler of the gods. Meanwhile, John Seale's cinematography goes overboard on the boldest colors in the crayon box, leaving to one of the most potently saturated movies in recent memory, however limited its overall palette; at times it feels like Miller was answering a dare to prove that shooting a movie in almost nothing but the dreaded orange and teal could be uncompromisingly beautiful and absolutely essential to the creation of a particular mood in which the harsh sky and empty desert dominate every exterior moment.
Like all of the Mad Maxes, Fury Road's exposition happens at slantwise angles to the actual script, leaving us to collect data on the fly as the film goes along, and this time, we have to do it while the whole movie is moving at something close to the speed of sound. It's marvelous, not just because it frees the film up from having to slow down for talking, but because it permits the movie to shockingly dense with commentary about its society and our own, all of it explored so invisibly that it never for a fraction of a moment appears that the movie has anything else on its mind but adrenaline. But that is surely not the case: it's a study of women actively defying the patriarchy in the most literal possible meaning of that word, of the way that vague religious promises can be used to placate and control people, of the way that personality cults can shore up a totalitarian system of central control and make the exploited feel like they have a rooting interest in their exploiters. Miller and Brendan McCarthy and Nico Lathouris's script dribbles out the necessary details to see these themes play out all out of order and in random places - the nature of Immortan Joe's death-and-rebirth religion especially shows up only when the characters would need it to - so it feels profoundly natural and organic, more a side-effect of the movie than the rhetorical justification for it.
And yet it's so deep in the film! It results in Fury Road boasting not just one of the most completely realised worlds in recent genre cinema, but two of the most complicated and interesting characters in Furiosa and Nux, the first combining raw feminism with a quiet self-loathing for all the good she hasn't done, the latter completing crisis-of-faith arc that is absurdly ambitious and unexpected for somebody that starts out as a thuggish sidekick. With the two chewiest parts, Theron and Hoult give the two best performances in a cast where nobody's less then strong; they, the cluster of actors playing the escaped sex slaves, and Hardy's more muted and soulful Max, far less detached and mythic than Mel Gibson's original take on the character (I do not know whether I think this works exclusively to the film's favor), give Fury Road the strong human spine it needs for its gonzo action to be emotionally involving on top being already quite exhilarating.
Providing spectacle of an unprecedented sort in the midst of one of the most fully fleshed-out artificial worlds in memory - here I am at the end, without even touching on Jenny Beavan's costume design and Colin Gibson's production design, despite those being two of the most important aspects of the whole movie, giving it the visual anchor it needs to feel real - Fury Road would already be quite a masterpiece of shallow entertainment, action with no purpose other than the sheer joy of movement and kinesis. But the sneaky intellectual depth of it, hardly the stuff of a philosophical text but impressively nuanced and complex for a movie that's devoting so much energy to expanding the vocabulary of movie action sequences, that's enough to put it on a level above even such recent instant-classics as The Raid, a film of pure genius that feels like cotton candy in comparison. Fury Road is a perfect action movie, and an improvement on the seemingly unimprovable Road Warrior, and one of the best films I've seen all decade.
10/10
Reviews in this series
Mad Max (Miller, 1979)
Mad Max 2 AKA The Road Warrior (Miller, 1981)
Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome (Miller and Ogilvie, 1985)
Mad Max: Fury Road (Miller, 2015)
This is, maybe, the film that George Miller was born to make. Oh, sure, Mad Max 2, AKA The Road Warrior, is flawless, divine masterpiece, but it didn't cost a titanic sum of money. Fury Road did, and Miller and crew made every penny count to the utmost. This is what happens when you take a man who spent the early years of his career creating entirely new ways of doing action cinema on a shoestring, provide him with 30 years to think about what he wanted to do next, and then give him all the budget he could require to realise it. Seeing scrappy, ingenious filmmakers make a whole lot of practically nothing is inspiring and exciting, but seeing them make a whole lot out of a whole lot is absolutely mindblowing. And also inspiring - in an age when sums of money that could buy and sell whole nations are used to produce nice and safe popcorn movies that feel very much the same as a dozen other movies that cost equally as much, it's close to a sacred experience to stumble across a movie that wants to use all those limitless resources to do something that we have never, ever seen before in a movie, and which most of us, I'd wager, couldn't even have imagined in the first place.
The film has characters, and a plot - eerily fucking good characters, and a plot that gets all sinewy and dense when you start to pick at it - but mostly, it has an overwhelming, damn near unendurable sense of momentum (it's the most active, physical viewing experience I've had in a very long time, with the short lulls in the action invariably leading to a long slow release of breath and the relaxation of muscles I didn't realise I was tensing up). The film opens with a slow, steady shot of Max Rockatansky (Tom Hardy) staring off at the desert in what used to be Australia, intoning in ragged voice-over the minute amount of backstory selected from the first three Mad Max pictures we need in order to know what's going on - Max was a cop before the world ended, and now he's roaming the wasteland trying to survive and forget - and after he kills and eats a two-headed mutant lizard, he hops in his V-8 Interceptor and starts the engines. The one in the car, and the one in the movie, which immediately turns into a chase and does not cease to be one until its second-to-last scene, though there are variations in who is being chased by whom and for what reason vary from moment to moment, and there are pauses throughout the narrative when the people giving chase are far enough in the background that they're not an immediate concern.
The main object of the chase isn't Max himself, but Furiosa (Charlize Theron), an Imperator in the army of Immortan Joe (Hugh Keays-Byrne, whose colorful villain credentials include the psychopathic biker Toecutter back in the original Mad Max), leader of the Citadel. It's one of the three human outposts in those part - Gas Town and Bullet Farm are the others - centered on a warrior death cult that Joe has derived and made himself the center of; and among the seemingly inexhaustible charms of Fury Road, one that makes me happiest to contemplate is the developmental arc it continues to form with the original trilogy. The Road Warrior shows post-apocalyptic world where the brightest light of civilisation is a disorganised, survivalist community a step above hunting and gathering; by the time of Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome, humanity has rediscovered towns, economy, and a cursory form of government; and here in Fury Road, religion has re-asserted itself, with the hierarchy and ritual attendant on those things.
But back to Furiosa. For reasons of her own, which are teased out throughout the movie, she has agreed to smuggle out five of Joe's "wives" - "breeding slaves" is rather more to the point, but religious despots have the luxury of defining terms - and bring them to safety far to the east of the region. Max, having already been captured by Joe's pasty white "war boys", is dragged along by one particularly zealous soldier named Nux (Nicholas Hoult), currently relying on Max as a blood donor to replenish his mostly exsanguinated, corpselike body. So Max is right at the heart of the Furiosa hunt, not that he gives any kind of shit, and as soon as he, the Imperator, and her five charges find themselves the only apparent survivors of a freakishly huge sandstorm, he's willing to abandon them to their doom, as long as he can get the hell away on Furiosa's heavily-armored war rig, a beastly hybrid of a semi truck and God knows what else. The only problem being that without her, he can't operate it, and she's not moving anywhere without the women she's protecting. So Max reluctantly becomes one half of the superhuman team trying to escape the combined military power of all three settlements, along with the nomadic terrorists who guard the canyon that's the only way deeper into the east.
Simple, pure, and responsible for the most crazed, beautifully-conceived, flawlessly executed car stunts in... ever? Probably ever. Any attempt to describe what happens across most of Fury Road, the first English-language movie I have ever seen that's more than 50% action setpieces, would quickly turn into tedious recitation of "this cool thing happened, and then this cool thing happened". Any attempt to describe how the filmmakers carried it off would quite stymie me, because I don't know, and "probably a fucking wizard" isn't a real answer. But it's flawless action, edited by Margaret Sixel to perfectly emphasise continuity across a whirlwind of shots from every angle as literally dozens of vehicles tear through the Namibian sand, with a simply phenomenal sound mix calling attention to every different component of every vehicle, and to Junkie XL's raging drums-and-guitar score, which is as rousing and intensifying to the viewer as it is to the characters onscreen (I'm going to allow myself one "this cool thing" aside: the giant truck of drums and a flamethrower guitar, present to arouse the war boys into a heightened state of bloodlust, and cunningly woven in and out of the film's soundscape, is pure popcorn movie pop-art genius). The film starts from the most outrageous concepts for staging fights, and only gets more and more involved and seemingly physically impossible as it goes along, with second unit director and stunt coordinator Guy Norris flinging human bodies and elaborately over-designed cars and trucks around the screen like the juggler of the gods. Meanwhile, John Seale's cinematography goes overboard on the boldest colors in the crayon box, leaving to one of the most potently saturated movies in recent memory, however limited its overall palette; at times it feels like Miller was answering a dare to prove that shooting a movie in almost nothing but the dreaded orange and teal could be uncompromisingly beautiful and absolutely essential to the creation of a particular mood in which the harsh sky and empty desert dominate every exterior moment.
Like all of the Mad Maxes, Fury Road's exposition happens at slantwise angles to the actual script, leaving us to collect data on the fly as the film goes along, and this time, we have to do it while the whole movie is moving at something close to the speed of sound. It's marvelous, not just because it frees the film up from having to slow down for talking, but because it permits the movie to shockingly dense with commentary about its society and our own, all of it explored so invisibly that it never for a fraction of a moment appears that the movie has anything else on its mind but adrenaline. But that is surely not the case: it's a study of women actively defying the patriarchy in the most literal possible meaning of that word, of the way that vague religious promises can be used to placate and control people, of the way that personality cults can shore up a totalitarian system of central control and make the exploited feel like they have a rooting interest in their exploiters. Miller and Brendan McCarthy and Nico Lathouris's script dribbles out the necessary details to see these themes play out all out of order and in random places - the nature of Immortan Joe's death-and-rebirth religion especially shows up only when the characters would need it to - so it feels profoundly natural and organic, more a side-effect of the movie than the rhetorical justification for it.
And yet it's so deep in the film! It results in Fury Road boasting not just one of the most completely realised worlds in recent genre cinema, but two of the most complicated and interesting characters in Furiosa and Nux, the first combining raw feminism with a quiet self-loathing for all the good she hasn't done, the latter completing crisis-of-faith arc that is absurdly ambitious and unexpected for somebody that starts out as a thuggish sidekick. With the two chewiest parts, Theron and Hoult give the two best performances in a cast where nobody's less then strong; they, the cluster of actors playing the escaped sex slaves, and Hardy's more muted and soulful Max, far less detached and mythic than Mel Gibson's original take on the character (I do not know whether I think this works exclusively to the film's favor), give Fury Road the strong human spine it needs for its gonzo action to be emotionally involving on top being already quite exhilarating.
Providing spectacle of an unprecedented sort in the midst of one of the most fully fleshed-out artificial worlds in memory - here I am at the end, without even touching on Jenny Beavan's costume design and Colin Gibson's production design, despite those being two of the most important aspects of the whole movie, giving it the visual anchor it needs to feel real - Fury Road would already be quite a masterpiece of shallow entertainment, action with no purpose other than the sheer joy of movement and kinesis. But the sneaky intellectual depth of it, hardly the stuff of a philosophical text but impressively nuanced and complex for a movie that's devoting so much energy to expanding the vocabulary of movie action sequences, that's enough to put it on a level above even such recent instant-classics as The Raid, a film of pure genius that feels like cotton candy in comparison. Fury Road is a perfect action movie, and an improvement on the seemingly unimprovable Road Warrior, and one of the best films I've seen all decade.
10/10
Reviews in this series
Mad Max (Miller, 1979)
Mad Max 2 AKA The Road Warrior (Miller, 1981)
Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome (Miller and Ogilvie, 1985)
Mad Max: Fury Road (Miller, 2015)
24 comments:
Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.
Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.
YES. ALL I WANTED WAS FOR YOU TO GIVE THIS A 10. I'm so ecstatic right now. Seriously, it elates me to read a review this rapturous; you have expressed such a huge chunk of my feelings about this fucking incredible movie.
ReplyDeleteThis sentence especially just kind of sums up my whole watching experience. "Any attempt to describe how the filmmakers carried it off would quite stymie me, because I don't know, and "probably a fucking wizard" isn't a real answer."
Damn, not holding back with this one are we?
ReplyDeleteI just got back from it a few hours ago and can't wait to see it again. It is, without exaggeration, one of the most flat-out crazy movies imaginable, in the best possible way. It's obvious that every idea that anyone had that could fit into the movie was put in there with love and care, and the production design, effects, score, and a dozen other cool little things all stack up as a result to make a truly unique movie. I could not agree more with your point that, in an age of greenscreen Marvel and Marvel-lites, seeing this bugfuck insane R-rated 150 million dollar passion project was incredibly refreshing.
Mad Max: Fury Road is one of the most electrifying cinema experiences I've had in my entire life. It's so vividly, unremorsefully unlike anything that's ever come before.
ReplyDeleteI'm so glad to hear that you appreciated, because if there's anyone who I can trust to treat popcorn movies with the respect they deserve, it's you.
Good work, as always!
Yes.
ReplyDeleteYes.
Yes.
This IS a 10/10 movie, and it IS, in fact, the best action movie this side of one-two 91/92 punch of Terminator 2 and Hard Boiled. Damn near every single element of its craft worked towards the whole. The themes, production/costume design, the score, the editing, the performances, the pacing of its narrative into discrete chapters, the weaving of character beats and story into the action, the incredibly kinetic and creative sequences that almost always coherent and readable, the expert direction, the usage of the latest filmmaking technique and technology. The use of color and negative space and the attention to detail and spatial awareness and my fuckin' goodness.
For the story it wanted to tell cinematically, its essentially perfect. George Miller had the time, money, the technical know-how to polish this
thing up til its gleans, and we're all the better for it.
I'm going crazy with hyperbole here, but I've just been so excited for this film for so long...for it to actually EXCEED my expectations like this and become one of the greatest action movies of all-time? The biggest, most beautiful, most thrilling, most thematically rich Mad Max ever? With some of the greatest action and world building in genre history? A 10/10 straight up movie masterpiece?
Its nothing short of a miracle, that this movie exists, in this form, in 2015. The purest strain of cinema I've seen in a long ass time.
Admittedly, I was reading this review in the fullest anticipation of that 10/10 rating at the bottom, but seeing it in black and white gave me that shot of FUCK YEAH for today.
ReplyDeleteHoly shit, this movie. The only point I want to add is that Mad Max: Fury Road is basically the movie that Michael Bay has spent his entire career thinking he is making: films with hyper-saturated colour palettes with wall-to-wall action.
Except that Bay does not have the creativity, or the editing coherence, or the stunning stunt choreography, or the non-regressive sexual politics, or the gorgeous cinematography, or the thematic depth, or the amazing production design, or the relentless momentum or the or the or the
I'm already counting down the days until I can watch this movie again. God bless George Miller. God bless Miller's mum for birthing him. God bless God for everything that has led to this moment in cinematic history. Holy shit.
Off-topic, but possibly important: is anyone else frequently getting redirected from this site to "gogardenclub.com"? It's happening now practically every time I go to the main page.
ReplyDeleteAnd while I'm on that note about Bay, I think you might have to actually acknowledge Rosie Huntington-Whiteley as a bona fide actress now.
ReplyDeleteI saw this yesterday. I liked it as an action movie and, compared to other american action films of the 2000s, it is definitely better than the great majority. However, I don't think that's a particularly high bar.
ReplyDeleteI mean, if this is a ten, then a film like 13 Assassins would have to be an 11. I invite the comparison because that's the other film that I can think of that spends more than half of its run-time on action-sequences.
What follow are my particular criticisms of Fury Road (SPOILERS ahead):
The main character is incredibly passive. In fact, having written "main character", I can see that's not even right. Max is not the main character - this is Furiosa Road. In the Road Warrior, we knew Max through his resourcefulness and the kinds of decisions that he made - recall his encounter with and treatment of the flying-machine guy as well as the sharp-standing decisions which he made in relation to helping or not helping the desert-town. Even his interactions with the feral kid – like when he gives him the music box. It is these decisions and actions which allowed us to really feel his character – to experience the film through him. By contrast, the Max of Fury Road is mostly characterized through these flash-backy screaming people who appear from time to time. These are a comparatively feeble device for generating viewer investment in the character.
Other problems arise from this one. Because we are not deeply invested in the main character, moments that should be ‘thematic’ or ‘emotional’ come across… well – that’s the thing, they don’t really *come across*. Instead, we spend them basically just waiting for the next action sequence.
Let me try to make this point clearer. There is a scene in The Road Warrior where Max has a choice to help the town or to take his reward – which seems like a huge reward indeed - and to be on his merry way. In his argument with the town leader, we get to hear these words “we’re still human beings with dignity, but you, you’re out there with the garbage – you’re nothing”. Max does not listen to the town-leader but instead he takes his sweet car and several canisters of fuel and drives off. In the next scene, his car is destroyed, the fuel is blown up and he himself almost dies. The argument, the decision and the consequences all work together in a powerful way to make us feel the futility of trying to make it on your own while forsaking community. But this powerful emotional effect is only achieved because, by then, we are deeply, deeply invested in the Max character – specifically because of all the decisions the he’s made up to this point. Were the same scene to be inserted into Fury Road, it wouldn’t work nearly as well – simply because, in that film, the investment into the character is lacking.
ReplyDeleteFuriosa and the zealot are better developed and more interesting. However, neither of them gets quite enough attention for their big moments to really work. In retrospect, they could have totally ditched Max and had Furiosa as the explicit and only main character with the Zealot as the side-kick and the film would probably have been better off.
It is also because of this lack of emotional investment that the ending feels totally flat and what is unbelievable in it feels like it is unbelievable and becomes noticeable as such.
If the problems described above had been fixed and we had the best possible version of this story, it would still do no better than bring home pretty much the same message as the Road Warrior – that when it is no longer possible to help oneself, it remains possible to get redemption by helping others. However, this isn’t necessarily a knock. The context of this film is uniquely well-suited for the delivery of this message. After all, we have religious zealots and a man obsessed with his own reproduction to play with – wonderful material if one wishes to talk about what is truly valuable in human life, especially in a post-apocalyptic setting – that is, in the face of death and total destruction. Rich soil. But it’s all for naught without a protagonist who we can invest in and through whom we can viscerally experience, not just the thrill of a good chase, but the nature of these human truths.
Maybe it's just that I was really tired at the time, or that I saw it in 3D on top of that, but I'm honestly a little baffled at all of the claims re: the film's wonderful editing. I thought the early going in particular was blisteringly incoherent and unpleasant. From that speed-ramped to hell and back pre-title sequence to the first proper action setpiece rendered as a series of bright orange sparks being flung at the camera constantly, and from nowhere in particular I found the film to be a bit of a searing orange eyesore.
ReplyDeleteIt improved considerably as it went on and the choreography got more elaborate while the editing slowed down, but I'm still hard-pressed to see what makes this vehicle-based action more thrilling, visually striking or well-assembled than anything in eg. the last two Fast & Furious films.
That said, the film has a lot else to recommend it - I wasn't crazy about the over-the-top orange and blue tinting (I thought it made the real-life desert look distressingly like a Sin City-esque green screen), but the red and white dust storm, and the moments where characters are framed as shadowboxes against the sky are some of the most striking pop-art images I've seen in a film in a long time.
On top of that, the story and world of the film are every bit as good as you said, and I'm greatly looking forward to revisiting the film to unpack it further. I suppose what it comes down to is that I love Fury Road as a work of post-apocalyptica, but I found it only adequate and frequently enervating as an action film.
Still, I don't think I've ever seen a film that cost this much money that so demonstrably didn't give half a shit if I or anybody else actually liked it. That's something rare and valuable enough that I don't actually half mind that I found liking it to be a bit of a struggle sometimes.
I think you have to look at every single movie individually, and not compare them to this Road Warrior over here or this 13 Assassins over there. You can't approach movies as if they were a checklist, "if it doesn't have THIS amount of character development or THIS amount of action, it failed". Every movie has its own goals, and we have to judge them based on how well they achieved that. Of course, you can think the goal was worthless; I remember Tim hated United 93 because of its subject matter, but he didn't pretend it was objectively awful in the way it utilized the craft of cinema to achieve its aims.
ReplyDeleteDespite their similarities, The Road Warrior and Fury Road are different films, with different goals. They are things about the Road Warrior that Fury Road doesn't have: its raw feel, its plain human pathos, its simple purity. Vice versa, there are things about Fury Road that the Road Warrior can't match, including the number and amount of insanely inventive and coherent action set pieces, or its blockbuster cinematography, or the polished feel of its storytelling. They have different strengths, and it make sense to prefer one over the other.
In the context of what Fury Road was trying to be, a conscious effort to make the biggest, most beautiful, thematically richest Mad Max with some of the most intricate and fully-realized world building in genre cinema, I think the character of Max works. He's our entrance into this crazy world, a man who starts off like a caged grunting animal and slowly gets his empathy and humanity back(beautifully understated in that blood transfusion to Furisoa as he tells her his name). He's a major character in almost every big sequence, has some of the film's biggest laughs, has several narrative plot hooks that pay off in the end(not just the main humanity bit, but even the flashbacks end up saving his life in the climax). His motivations don't drive the main plot, but that's ok because Furiosa is a great, developed character in her own right.
You can't insert this version of Max into Fury Road anymore then you can put the Road Warrior Max into this film. They're different movies with different goals. Fury Road is a conscious attempt at making The Ultimate Chase Movie. The characterization have to be economical. The ideas have to be broad and easily digested. The goal of the film is to achieve a palpable sense of momentum for 2 hours in a way no other film ever has, and its characters and its plot fit that just about perfectly. The Fury Road isn't and wasn't trying to be the Road Warrior. But the Road Warrior can't be Fury Road either. They're both 10/10 films in their own way.
@Bryan Nimmo, I've been getting a gogardenclub.com redirect on my computer (using my phone right now) for the past couple days, though I can't recall if it's on this site or only this site.
ReplyDeleteThe internet tells me that the SiteMeter widget is causing it. I've taken it away, but if anybody still gets that problem, definitely pipe up and let me know.
ReplyDeleteTim, I'm writing this here because I can't quite figure out where else to do it. Why haven't you reviewed Marketa Lazarova? It has a wonderful 2013 blu-ray transfer from Criterion. You've reviewed most of my other all-time favourites, so this gem was noticeably missing. And if you haven't seen it, do yourself the favour.
ReplyDelete(Oh yeah, and Mad Max: Fury Road is certainly a 10/10. I'm sure there have been better action movies in the history of cinema, but in its immediate afterglow, I just can't seem to think of them.)
It's even worse - I own Marketa Lazarova, on that same exact Blu-ray, and I still haven't seen it. I make no excuses for myself whatsoever, but I'm certainly aware that it's a conspicuous gap.
ReplyDeleteI'm not really sure what I can add to what has already been written at this point. Getting me to admit that an action movie is better than The Raid is one fucking tall order indeed, and yet here we are.
ReplyDeleteNo words. They should have sent a poet.
@Bryan Nimmo, I've been getting a gogardenclub.com redirect on my computer (using my phone right now) for the past couple days, though I can't recall if it's on this site or only this site.
ReplyDeleteI am stuck somewhere between Fedor Ilitchev's criticism (lack of investment in character) and Jeremy's response (thematically rich, and on different terms than Road Warrior). First off, the wild-craziness of Fury Road is certainly fun, but I kept wondering, how is this craziness that much different than the weirdness of that other Miller -- Frank -- in the 300? I am not saying they are equally successful (and their politics are certainly different), but at what point does a gonzo tent-pole become mere circus? How does spectacle take over the thematics of narrative?
ReplyDeleteMad Max and Mad Max 2 are both invested in a post-apocalyptic world where skill and cruelty are the key operatives over morality and community. In Road Warrior, these are brought in particular tension. In the final chase scene, every good character dies because they stop thinking about skill and start thinking morally. My problem is that Fury Road invests very little in conceiving the skills of its characters. Max gets caught right away (why is he eating a lizard when he's being chased?), and he doesn't seem to do much right throughout. The is no sense that he's somebody especially skillful in this wasteland -- and isn't that the whole point, that Max IS better and CAN survive on his own? The other main character, Furiosa is an imperator driver -- but these credentials are put before us without emphasizing them or showing us what that means. She does some very cool things, but there is very little sense by the end of the film that her skill set is above the others -- note that the drivers of the tanker - Max, Furiosa, and Nux -- in the last sequence are interchangeable. If you're going to build on the thematic richness of a Max film, that can't just happen in world-building dimensions like religion, but has to focus on these people's skills: how good are they at driving a machine?? The film seems to care more about the ballet of action than this dimension.
Last points, the film doesn't have nearly the sense of black humor and quietness that Road Warrior has. I'm talking about moments like Wex's man-boy killed with the boomerang, or the guy trying to light a cigarette on a tire and falling under it during the chase. These are wonderful, quirky moments that the bombast of Fury Road has little time for. When it wants to slow down, it signals the importance of the quietness miles ahead -- like when the older woman shows the seeds she grows to one of the wives (she will die later, and the seed bag put on her lap). Ok, but contrast that to Road Warrior's music box, which Max first plays and laughs at after a dead body has nearly fallen on top of him. Black humor, yet personal -- there is a forced smile amidst all this. I didn't find any comparable moments in Fury Road. More circus -- but a damn good one, and, I agree, probably the best popcorn action flick of the summer.
13 Assassins by Miike pales in comparison to the original 60s black and white film.
ReplyDeleteFury Road lives up to its hyperbole.
Fury Road just melted my face off. Holy shit, I'm thirsty.
ReplyDeleteI just saw this in 3D. I loved just every little thing about it. Charlize Theron is everything I have ever wanted from a tough female protagonist. Tim has pretty much covered everything else - how great the action is, how beautiful the worldbuilding is, how it doesn't vomit exposition onto you but you still know basically what's going on.
ReplyDeleteAlthough, speaking as a woman and a feminist, sometimes I feel this film is a little too harsh on the males (why yes, men WILL join with women to work together when there is literally no other option but insanity and death; and wow, THREE different incarnations of hideous ruling patriarchy). I still love it enough to go see it again in theaters, something this Marvel fan girl did not do for Ultron.
I must respectfully disagree with you on that second point, actually. I absolutely get where you're coming from, for sure. But I think there's way more going on than just "men are wicked, women are good" - I think a movie that reductive would never have given Nux such a complicated redemption arc, for one thing.
ReplyDeleteBut it's a much too sprawling topic to go into in a comment, especially this late at night. Suffice it to say that as a man, I don't have any disagreement with the things the movie says that men would be capable of doing in this kind of environment. It feels to me like a natural prediction based on recorded human history, depressing as it is to say.
Sure, there are some flaws in this films--fer crying out loud, it starts with a voice-over. The trauma flashbacks are ham-fisted. And...this is the single greatest action chase-thriller in cinema, and it's grounded in a libratory feminist humanism. Think about it: there's a film that makes the previous sentence possible.
ReplyDeleteGood points, Tim. I loved Nux and his entire story, and that he didn't turn out to be the disposable character he at first seems.
ReplyDelete