02 June 2016
JUNE 2016 MOVIE PREVIEW
Maybe it's just me, but the month to come seems almost hilariously under-nourished. A whole wave of sequels that I can't imagine anybody asking for, the most prominently misbegotten video game adaptation in a long while, and one particular animated picture that... we'll talk about that shortly.
At any rate, my conviction that summer 2016 is a weird afterthought is not meaningfully endangered by any of the wide releases coming out in the next few weeks.
3.6.2016
Here's a great feeling: when you think that you've missed your window to see Love & Friendship, and instead it's expanding past the 600+ theater threshold required to consider a movie "wide-release" in the United States (The Lobster is also expanding, just barely missing that mark). Mind you, I still haven't seen it, so I can't go on and say that you should bother, but I imagine it's the safest bet among the weekend's wide releases.
The presumptive highest-grossing film of the week, after all, is Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows, the sequel to one of the worst tentpoles of the 2010s. This one is leaning way the hell harder on a nostalgic appeal that I am, in theory, susceptible to, but the foul taste of the first one is going to take a lot of scrubbing, and it's still got Michael Bay on as producer. Almost by default, I'm more interested in both of the other two new films, though Me Before You needs this kind of barrel-scraping competition to look good in contrast: a romantic melodrama featuring as its leads two such committed non-entities as Emilia Clarke and Sam Claflin is starting with its arms both tied behind its back and one leg cut off. Leaving us with only Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping, and the combined talents of the Lonely Island team is enough to make that look vaguely promising, albeit tempered by the knowledge that their greatest achievements have been entirely in the form of shorts.
10.6.2016
Here are those sequels I was talking about: The Conjuring 2 and Now You See Me 2. I at least grasp the notion behind the former: successful horror movies engender sequels like a gentle April rainfall engenders dandelions, and The Conjuring was a once-a-generation event in the genre. That being said, the justification for adding onto the franchise seems tenuous at very best, especially since it's impossible for the excellent Lili Taylor to come back this time around. Still, I'd probably be actually excited about this (Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson were also excellent, and they are back, and director James Wan seems generally reinvigorated), except for one thing: it runs to two-and-a-quarter goddamn hours. It's a ghost story, Jesus Christ, not a historical epic. There are great horror films that break the two-hour barrier, but they are stupendously rare (in the English language, I come up with The Exorcist and Dawn of the Dead).
As for Now You See Me 2, outside of the profoundly unforgivable missed opportunity to name it Now You Don't, I just don't see why the bother. The first was an agreeable lark; a fun, frothy bit of nonsense that seems to have left no trace of its passing on anybody's memory, regardless of one of the leggiest box office runs in recent memory. But I suppose I see no reason to assume it will be any worse; it's not like they have to capture lightning in a bottle again, just lightning bugs.
And then there's Warcraft, a film whose trailers have witnessed some of the worst CGI in a decade or more, in service to what has all the appearance of a paint-by-numbers fantasy tromp. I want to be excited for this - high fantasy is rarer than it should be in the movies, and I am fully on board with both of director Duncan Jones's last two movies. This looks dreadful as all hell, though.
17.6.2016
Alright, readers, here's your job in comments: give me a reason to be excited for Finding Dory. For weeks, I'd been playing the "Pixar's trailers always suck" game with myself, but increasingly, that's not doing it. The fact is, the idea has seemed transparently wrong since the moment it was announced: the timing made it so clear that it was the Faustian pact Andrew Stanton made to avoid being put in director jail after the farrago of John Carter, and it's real fucking hard to whip oneself up into a frenzy of enthusiasm when that is one's very first thought about a new project. Besides, Finding Nemo had such an elegant shape (but then, so did Toy Story, and we all know how that turned out). Anyway, I want to be wrong. I want very desperately to be wrong - Pixar just got its groove back, and I remember the days of having the new Pixar being one of my top five most anticipated movies for every calendar year with enormous fondness. I would like to get back to them. But in truth, I have never dreaded a new Pixar film this much before the reviews started rolling in - no, not even Cars 2.
Meanwhile, Dwayne Johnson is large and Kevin Hart is tiny, and this is apparently the total motivating force behind Central Intelligence. But we've fully hit the point where I'd jump off a bridge for Dwayne Johnson, so I'm going to be there.
24.6.2016
So there's a sequel to Independence Day, just 20 years later. It's called Independence Day: Resurgence. How about that.
Meanwhile, a social issues prestige costume drama accidentally blunders its way into wide summertime release, in the form of Free State of Jones. Sight unseen, my favorite thing about it is already that it's going to be compared to Nate Parker's The Birth of a Nation in all of 2016's most tedious and inescapable op-eds on movie culture.
29.6.2016
Blake Lively fights a shark in The Shallows. What the hell, why not.
At any rate, my conviction that summer 2016 is a weird afterthought is not meaningfully endangered by any of the wide releases coming out in the next few weeks.
3.6.2016
Here's a great feeling: when you think that you've missed your window to see Love & Friendship, and instead it's expanding past the 600+ theater threshold required to consider a movie "wide-release" in the United States (The Lobster is also expanding, just barely missing that mark). Mind you, I still haven't seen it, so I can't go on and say that you should bother, but I imagine it's the safest bet among the weekend's wide releases.
The presumptive highest-grossing film of the week, after all, is Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows, the sequel to one of the worst tentpoles of the 2010s. This one is leaning way the hell harder on a nostalgic appeal that I am, in theory, susceptible to, but the foul taste of the first one is going to take a lot of scrubbing, and it's still got Michael Bay on as producer. Almost by default, I'm more interested in both of the other two new films, though Me Before You needs this kind of barrel-scraping competition to look good in contrast: a romantic melodrama featuring as its leads two such committed non-entities as Emilia Clarke and Sam Claflin is starting with its arms both tied behind its back and one leg cut off. Leaving us with only Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping, and the combined talents of the Lonely Island team is enough to make that look vaguely promising, albeit tempered by the knowledge that their greatest achievements have been entirely in the form of shorts.
10.6.2016
Here are those sequels I was talking about: The Conjuring 2 and Now You See Me 2. I at least grasp the notion behind the former: successful horror movies engender sequels like a gentle April rainfall engenders dandelions, and The Conjuring was a once-a-generation event in the genre. That being said, the justification for adding onto the franchise seems tenuous at very best, especially since it's impossible for the excellent Lili Taylor to come back this time around. Still, I'd probably be actually excited about this (Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson were also excellent, and they are back, and director James Wan seems generally reinvigorated), except for one thing: it runs to two-and-a-quarter goddamn hours. It's a ghost story, Jesus Christ, not a historical epic. There are great horror films that break the two-hour barrier, but they are stupendously rare (in the English language, I come up with The Exorcist and Dawn of the Dead).
As for Now You See Me 2, outside of the profoundly unforgivable missed opportunity to name it Now You Don't, I just don't see why the bother. The first was an agreeable lark; a fun, frothy bit of nonsense that seems to have left no trace of its passing on anybody's memory, regardless of one of the leggiest box office runs in recent memory. But I suppose I see no reason to assume it will be any worse; it's not like they have to capture lightning in a bottle again, just lightning bugs.
And then there's Warcraft, a film whose trailers have witnessed some of the worst CGI in a decade or more, in service to what has all the appearance of a paint-by-numbers fantasy tromp. I want to be excited for this - high fantasy is rarer than it should be in the movies, and I am fully on board with both of director Duncan Jones's last two movies. This looks dreadful as all hell, though.
17.6.2016
Alright, readers, here's your job in comments: give me a reason to be excited for Finding Dory. For weeks, I'd been playing the "Pixar's trailers always suck" game with myself, but increasingly, that's not doing it. The fact is, the idea has seemed transparently wrong since the moment it was announced: the timing made it so clear that it was the Faustian pact Andrew Stanton made to avoid being put in director jail after the farrago of John Carter, and it's real fucking hard to whip oneself up into a frenzy of enthusiasm when that is one's very first thought about a new project. Besides, Finding Nemo had such an elegant shape (but then, so did Toy Story, and we all know how that turned out). Anyway, I want to be wrong. I want very desperately to be wrong - Pixar just got its groove back, and I remember the days of having the new Pixar being one of my top five most anticipated movies for every calendar year with enormous fondness. I would like to get back to them. But in truth, I have never dreaded a new Pixar film this much before the reviews started rolling in - no, not even Cars 2.
Meanwhile, Dwayne Johnson is large and Kevin Hart is tiny, and this is apparently the total motivating force behind Central Intelligence. But we've fully hit the point where I'd jump off a bridge for Dwayne Johnson, so I'm going to be there.
24.6.2016
So there's a sequel to Independence Day, just 20 years later. It's called Independence Day: Resurgence. How about that.
Meanwhile, a social issues prestige costume drama accidentally blunders its way into wide summertime release, in the form of Free State of Jones. Sight unseen, my favorite thing about it is already that it's going to be compared to Nate Parker's The Birth of a Nation in all of 2016's most tedious and inescapable op-eds on movie culture.
29.6.2016
Blake Lively fights a shark in The Shallows. What the hell, why not.
23 comments:
Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.
Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.
Given that Dory was by a wide margin the worst thing in Finding Nemo, I don't know that I have much hope to give you. Though admittedly, I know I'm in a distinct minority in not being a big fan of that movie, so what the hell.
ReplyDeleteWan's earned enough good will as of late to get me excited for Conjuring 2 the streets and the trailers have been spot on. I'll see Indepence Day 2 because why the hell not but the rest looks like a flaming garbage dump.
ReplyDeleteConjuring 2 might not have Lili Taylor but it does apparently have David Thewlis, which seems like a pretty fair compensation. Certainly, it's going to need some really solid character acting to survive that running time.
ReplyDeleteSo prior to Independence Day 2: The Freedoming (I just woke up; can anyone else think of something better?), are you gonna do a Blockbuster History review of the first one? Okay, yeah, I guess you don't want a stroke.
ReplyDeleteRe: Warcraft: I get the impression that the movie itself is ... pretty good. Nothing amazing, but not terrible. The trailers and general marketing campaign have apparently been doing it quite a disservice.
ReplyDeleteThe one person most excited about Finding Dory has been Ellen Degeneres, so at least you'll get an enthusiastic vocal performance. Also, it should be indescribably beautiful.
ReplyDeleteMy youngest daughter is on a sudden fish kick,so I'll definitely be there.
Scott Mendelson at Forbes says "I cannot think of a time when a franchise starter as terrible as Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles produced a sequel as good as Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows."
ReplyDeleteAt the very least, that's enough to get me into the theaters.
"There are great horror films that break the two-hour barrier, but they are stupendously rare (in the English language, I come up with The Exorcist and Dawn of the Dead)"
ReplyDeleteWell, and of course The Shining. But your point is extremely well taken, and I am fascinated/dumbfounded at that running time for Conjuring 2. I still have no interest in it, but I am also extremely curious as to just how they can get 135 minutes out of it.
No movie terrifies me more than Finding Dory. And not a single interview, trailer, commercial, or ad have told me its not gonna be a Monsters Inc University at best.
ReplyDeleteI guess I'll just...see the Lobster again!
Curious if you're ever going to review X-Men? As long it's taken I'm guessing we're gonna be waiting a long time for TMNT2 too right?
ReplyDeleteAdmittedly,I've not seen any of the original films that are birthing these sequels - so I'm regrettably not eager for half of this Summer's flood of banality. However, the trailer for "Independence Day" was, I confess, the only preview in the theaters that didn't make me gassy and wince twitchingly in squirming ennui. The performances seem genuine, the nostalgia is very fond, and the effects felt nicely textured and rich. So I'm looking forward to that one, if only for the wrinkly reunion of my highschool memories.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with Brian that, if nothing else, "Finding Dory" will be gorgeous, especially in 3D, with eager vocal work from Ellen and, hopefully, Brooks - who's one of the most prolific ad-libbers on the planet with his sharp tongue (although during the last clip I saw, he was strangely subdued and flat, which gives me pause..)
I am also, however, looking forward to "The Shining 2 - Shine Harder" and the much regarded Armageddon sequel: "Armagaddonagain - the Armageddoning".
GeoX- Have I mentioned that I love the new name? I love it. Also, you are in the very, very distinct minority, but I salute your right to be there.
ReplyDeleteTravis- I've got to say, the Conjuring 2 trailer I just saw for the first time made me feel awfully good inside, even with the characteristic Wan "old ladies are inherently scary" desiccated nun.
Chris- It does! And fair is fair, I actually like Thewlis more than Taylor, but I see him often enough, and Taylor sightings are so damnably rare.
Andrew- I'm afraid so. Ever since I didn't do it for Hollywood Century in 2014, I've known this day was coming.
Andy- I've heard very little, but what I've heard backs that up. It's just SO hard to believe, based on the trailer.
Brian- Beautiful no doubt. Finding Nemo holds up great after 13 years, and with that much more rendering power at their command, I'm expecting something hugely triumphant.
franklinshepard- Mendelson's hardly my favorite, but that is a uniquely reassuring phrase.
Luke- Duh! For some reason, I had it in my head that The Shining was just a hair under two hours, like 119.5 minutes or something. Obviously, that's off by a huge amount.
Jeremy- Boy, if I was getting "no better than Monsters University" out of those ads, I'd be feeling way happier. At least that movie's marketing never suggested that it was a beat-for-beat remake of the original
ComplicatedWizard- Today! In fact, I had about 250 words of my Apocalypse review written last night, when I realised that it was Thursday, and I needed to crank out a June preview before the first June Friday.
I'd had enormously ambitious plans to see six movies in three days this week, but everything went plummeting straight to hell for reasons that I shan't go into. It's not been happy around the house these few days, let's leave it at that. I will, however, do my level best to see Out of the Shadows and The Lobster as soon as possible.
Interesting you say that about Pixar trailers, Tim. I've never really noticed it before outside the dreadful Inside Out one that misled me into believing I was in for a slight variation on yet more irritating anthropomorphic hijinx a la Tier 2 DreamWorks. Had no idea it would be The Most Sophisticated Film of 2015. I'm still surprised by how much that film got to me. Still, I remember my previous candidate for best Pixar film, Toy Story 3 had a trailer I adored, opening with Randy Newman's "Losing You" over the camcorder footage of Andy playing - worked for me. Any other examples of bad Pixar trailers?
ReplyDelete"Blake Lively fights a shark in The Shallows."
ReplyDeleteCrosses fingers. Prays for squaloid victory.
The creators wanted to name it that and fought for it but the studio forced them to name it "Now You See Me 2" because NYSM is a "brand" now and they thought it would be too confusing for people. They were going to compromise and call it "Now You See Me 2: Now You Don't" but then the creators decided that title was way too long and just took the L and named it NYSM2.
ReplyDeleteConcise Statement- I vividly remember being actively shocked at the "belt doesn't fit" teaser for The Incredibles back in '04, because it was the very first time ever that a piece of marketing for a Pixar movie made the film seem at all desirable to watch. Toy Story 2 had some notably awful spots, as I recall. "The Boys Are Back In Town" re-written with "Toys", that kind of thing.
ReplyDeleteThey've gotten better lately, though I'd point to the Up teaser, the first full Cars trailer, the whole Ratatouille campaign (which, to be fair, how in all the hell do you sell that movie?), and that utterly smug "you know that we're geniuses? Well, WE sure as shit know that we're geniuses" trailer for WALL·E as particular low points in recent years (I mean the WALL·E one worked on me, but it's still way tacky). And I thought they did a terrible job of making The Good Dinosaur look as charming as it was, but I know that most people liked that film less than I did.
Neil- Sir, you have given me a vocabulary word.
Jeremy- Okay, see that gives me hope, because it means at least somebody was in the right mindset.
I wish Finding Dory was the Monsters University to Finding Nemo's Monsters Inc., if that makes any sense. But I don't think it will be. I suspect it will be okay (unless they don't find a way to tone down Dory's general obnoxiousness for her feature, which is frighteningly possible), but if it isn't, then that's two crappy Pixar movies in a row. For whatever Tim saw in The Good Dinosaur--beyond its well-accomplished backgrounds, anyway--is frankly beyond me.
ReplyDeleteThe Lobster worries me too. I know it's supposed to be fantastic, but The Self-Evidently Stupid and Obscurantist Allegory subgenre of science fiction is always going to be a hard sell for me. (See, e.g., In Time.)
I'm glad to see my nonsense names get appreciation!
ReplyDeleteThe Good Dinosaur was delightfully off-kilter. It felt like some kind of prehistoric post-apocalypse. As for Finding Nemo, yeah, man, I just don't know. I distinctly remember there were a lot of Pixar movies I hadn't seen, and I rented both The Incredibles and Finding Nemo from Blockbuster (holy crud, this was when brick-and-mortar *Blockbusters* were a thing), and watched them back-to-back. Watching The Incredibles, I thought, oh man, this is RAD, I can't believe it's taken so long to see this. Then watching Finding Nemo, I thought, huh. This is...significantly less rad. That's all I know! I have no excuse! I will freely concede that it might just have been my mindset at the time, and if I saw it now I'd like it a lot more.
One of the problems of The Conjuring 2: Conjure Harder vs. other >2-hour movies mentioned that The Shining, The Exorcist, and Dawn of the Dead is that unlike haunted house/ghost stories, they don't mainly rely on jump scares. They also depend a lot on the atmosphere and sense of existential dread. Plus I still think the opening music in The Shining is the creepiest movie music I've ever heard. And given how the Paranormal Activity franchise went down in flames, I'm rather pessimistic about Electric BOO-galoo here.
ReplyDelete(PS: To get the sense of a slow burn in horror, do read the original book of The Shining in case you haven't. I liked the movie, but I would agree with Stephen King somewhat in that the book was better. Maybe they should've cast the saner-looking Harrison Ford as Jack.)
"Love & Friendship" is tremendously great. If you like Whit Stillman and Jane Austen then it's heaven.
ReplyDeleteGeox - or is it Xoeg? You diabolical bastard! - your problem was watching the Incredibles first. After the wall-to-wall just straight up fun of that movie you were never going to be in a mindset to appreciate the more sedate, thoughtful Nemo. It really is a very good movie, although given the choice I'll always pull the Incredibles off the shelf instead.
ReplyDeleteI saw this preview for The Conjuring 2 in theaters and when it reached the "Moy nyme is Biww Wiwson" bit, I assumed it was a spoof of all those "ghost-hunting" "reality TV" shows and started cracking up. As the preview went on and I realized it wasn't a spoof and it was supposed to be seriously scary, I laughed even harder.
ReplyDeleteI suppose it goes without saying that I'm not the biggest horror fan...
Re: The Shining - Confusion was probably caused by the fact that there are two versions out there, the original US cut which ran at 144 minutes and the much shorter European cut at 113 minutes. Kubrick reportedly preferred the latter version, although I can't see eye-to-eye on that point, not least because the Euro cut is left with significantly less screen time for Scatman Crothers.
ReplyDeleteFinding Dory - erm, yeah. I know that everyone's looking to this one to confirm whether or not Pixar are truly back on form (with Inside Out to overshadow it, I suspect that most people are willing to overlook The Good Dinosaur as an unfortunate write-off), but I can't say that I'm jumping at the prospect of visiting this particular world again after thirteen years. I liked the original just fine, although I'll confess that I've always been slightly bewildered as to why people rate it quite as highly as they do. I mean, it seems to be the second most common response you'll get whenever you ask people about their favourite Pixar film (the most common being Toy Story), whereas for me it always fell closer toward the middle. On top of which, my favourite character, the angler fish, was killed off in the closing credits, so that's my interest in a sequel dampened. :p