20 June 2016
THE SEA INSIDE
Finding Dory is definitely the best sequel made by Pixar Animation Studios without the word "toy" in the title. This is a relief, but not all that much of an achievement: Cars 2 is a visually ravishing trash fire, while Monsters University is an easy-going, wildly lazy hang-out movie that only turns on its brain for the final act. Improving on those two doesn't take a whole lot, and sadly, that's just about all that Finding Dory offers. It's firmly in Pixar's "well that didn't quite work, but it was a great try!" tier, alongside Brave and The Good Dinosaur, and if I like it less than either of them, that's because the strain of being a sequel gives it a much harder time than those films' incomplete character development and world-building.
Which isn't to say it's a washout, or anything, and for the first few minutes, you might even be able to mistake it for a masterpiece. The opening is a flashback to the childhood of Dory (Sloane Murray), a blue tang fish with chronic short-term memory loss, being enthusiastically coached and aided by her parents, Jenny (Diane Keaton) and Charlie (Eugene Levy). It is a charming, sweet snapshot of life of how coping with a mental disability works in a tight-knit, supportive family, with Keaton and Levy providing heartbreakingly warm and parental vocal delivery (things I did not expect to learn in life: Eugene Levy saying "cupcake" could make my eyes tear up). The juvenile Dory character model is also perversely, obscenely cute, made up almost nothing but eyes and a tail. And as storytelling, this sequence is crisp and efficient, laying out what we need to know about the characters and their feelings, telescoping time through a series of whip-smart edits that show how Dory was, after a certain point, swept away by an undertow and left to fend for herself in the wide ocean, on a constant hunt to find her parents, even after her compromised memory and years of loneliness, she's forgotten who she was looking for, or why.
And then this not-quite-a-montage wraps itself up with a scene from Dory's perspective (she's by this point voiced by Ellen DeGeneres), in which a speedboat races by over the surface of the water, chased by a terrified clownfish named Marlin (Albert Brooks). He asks about the boat, and she volunteers to lead him, and the scene just kind of dissolves into nothingness. Most of the audience has seen this film's 2003 predecessor,Finding Nemo, so we all know what's going on in this moment, but it is extraordinarily artless and clunky. Nor is it necessary: a straight cut from lost child Dory to adult Dory at the time of the film's present (one year after the events of Finding Nemo) would get the same job done while still trading on the viewer's knowledge of the earlier film. It was, at any rate, the first time I was shocked out of the movie, right there in the theater, with the awareness of how crudely Dory had just called back to Nemo, disrupting its own narrative integrity for no gain. I am sorry to report that it was not the last time I had this feeling.
The body of the movie plays out, for the most part, as themes and variations on Finding Nemo - close enough that you can map a lot of the beats onto the earlier film, far enough that it doesn't come across as a pure retread. Dory has an unexpected flash of a memory - just enough to start to figure out where she might have lost her parents so long ago, and instantly sets off to find them, with Marlin and his son Nemo (Hayden Rolence) in tow. Hitching a ride with the turtles who featured into the last film, they cross the Pacific in hardly the blink of an eye - one of the more prominent missteps in the new movie, given what a film-length ordeal it was just to round the east coast of Australia last time - the trio ends up at the Marine Life Institute in Morro Bay, California. Accident causes Dory to end up inside the Institute, still questing to find her parents, while Marlin and Nemo work to find their way inside to rescue her. It lacks for the grandeur of Nemo's exploration of the ocean, stretching out to the edges of the frame, but I think the limited scale works to Dory's favor: it creates a different kind of environment to explore, and generally more interesting physical challenges for the characters to overcome.
Insofar as Finding Dory follows Dory's attempt to navigate the Institute, it's a mostly charming adventure-comedy. The film's new set of characters aren't quite at the top of the scale for sidekicks in Pixar movies, but they're pretty delightful company: Destiny the whale shark (Kaitlin Olson) - the screenplay by director Andrew Stanton and Victoria Strouse, undoubtedly with contributions from dozens of people inside Pixar doesn't seem to be aware that whale sharks are sharks, not whales, alas - and Bailey the beluga (Ty Burrell) are good-natured additions to the film's "with help and support, you can overcome your physical limitations" message, as well as charmingly-designed figures (Destiny seems purposefully built to be the model for an oversized plush toy). The new star, no question, is Hank the seven-armed octopus, a paranoid, skulking sort played with maximum crabby old man sharpness by Ed O'Neill, and subject to an inventive array of gags involving octopodes' ability to change color to blend into their backgrounds, stretched to exaggerated ends. Dory's chase through the pipes and displays of the Institute to find what happened to her blue tang clan never rises above the level of "delightful kids' movie shenanigans" - but it is delightful, and then some.
Meanwhile, the film frequently checks in with Marlin and Nemo, and it dies there. It's not that the animation is weaker, nor the gag construction (there's a great scene involving a fountain spitting jets of water, this film's version of the jellyfish forest from Nemo), and through this subplot we get to meet another set of wonderful new characters - Fluke (Idris Elba) and Rudder (Dominic West), a pair of territorial sea lions who draw from the "mine! mine!" seagulls in Nemo while adding a level of low-rent London gangster comedy, and the frazzled, unspeaking, possibly psychotic common loon Becky. We also have to cope with how badly this film fucks up Marlin and Nemo, and how unpleasant it is to spend any time with them. The problem is one of balancing tones: in Finding Nemo, Marlin was the straight man, and Dory was the comic relief. Now that Dory has been elevated to straight man status, Marlin fills the roll of comic relief, except he's still a straight man, which gives his character no particular function. Beyond that, his personality has been rolled back from the last film: he's neurotic and overprotective again, this time with a weird bullying streak. Nemo's solitary function, meanwhile, is to be a humorless moral scold, glowering at Marlin constantly. All the time spent with Marlin and Nemo is time wasted, even when it's in support of decent comedy.
The need to force Marlin into Finding Nemo is the worst thing about it as sequel, and probably also the most inevitable. In general, the film is too anxious to incorporate characters from last time, even when they don't fit (though the post-credits scene, which serves no other purpose than to do exactly this, is a marvel), and Marlin is the worst of it - not that he couldn't fit into the new film's story, but that all of the choices made by the filmmakers ensure that he doesn't. It's terribly for Finding Dory's pace, for its comedy, even for its emotional appeal, given how one-note and shrill all of of the Marlin/Nemo scenes are, and how much the detract from the none-too-penetrating sentiment of the Dory scenes.
It is disappointing that Stanton of all people should be responsible for this mismanagement of rhythm and mood: WALL·E has some of the finest blending of raw emotion with chase-based comedy in Pixar's stable, and it's the thing Finding Dory does worst. Its big thriller finale is gaudy and overdone, and by the time the slow-motion and Louis Armstrong kick in, it feels like we're watching something much too cheap to be graced with even the now-tarnished Pixar brand name; and while DeGeneres does a fine job of rebooting the character to be a sentimental lead (though I think she did better at letting hints of tragedy sneak out of the clowning around she did in the first film), there's not much that positions this film to be have the richness of feeling that used to be Stanton's great strength.
None of which is to say that Finding Dory is a failure - it's immensely likable and sincere, and often very funny - the sea lions are terrific, and real-life actor Sigourney Weaver is turned into a thoroughly unexpected running joke that keeps paying off no matter how many how times the screenplay revisits it. Its contrivances and violations of biology and good sense (which are many) come across in the spirit of good fun, and it's beautiful to look at, of course - not as creative as Inside Out nor as vivid as The Good Dinosaur, but there's nothing in here to risk Pixar's status as the most technically accomplished animation studio in the world. It's a safe movie, though, one too-obviously calculated to hit its marks as a sequel, and while I think that Stanton and company did a fine job of exploring new territory with this film, I also don't believe for a second that the story preceded the marketing impetus.
7/10
Which isn't to say it's a washout, or anything, and for the first few minutes, you might even be able to mistake it for a masterpiece. The opening is a flashback to the childhood of Dory (Sloane Murray), a blue tang fish with chronic short-term memory loss, being enthusiastically coached and aided by her parents, Jenny (Diane Keaton) and Charlie (Eugene Levy). It is a charming, sweet snapshot of life of how coping with a mental disability works in a tight-knit, supportive family, with Keaton and Levy providing heartbreakingly warm and parental vocal delivery (things I did not expect to learn in life: Eugene Levy saying "cupcake" could make my eyes tear up). The juvenile Dory character model is also perversely, obscenely cute, made up almost nothing but eyes and a tail. And as storytelling, this sequence is crisp and efficient, laying out what we need to know about the characters and their feelings, telescoping time through a series of whip-smart edits that show how Dory was, after a certain point, swept away by an undertow and left to fend for herself in the wide ocean, on a constant hunt to find her parents, even after her compromised memory and years of loneliness, she's forgotten who she was looking for, or why.
And then this not-quite-a-montage wraps itself up with a scene from Dory's perspective (she's by this point voiced by Ellen DeGeneres), in which a speedboat races by over the surface of the water, chased by a terrified clownfish named Marlin (Albert Brooks). He asks about the boat, and she volunteers to lead him, and the scene just kind of dissolves into nothingness. Most of the audience has seen this film's 2003 predecessor,Finding Nemo, so we all know what's going on in this moment, but it is extraordinarily artless and clunky. Nor is it necessary: a straight cut from lost child Dory to adult Dory at the time of the film's present (one year after the events of Finding Nemo) would get the same job done while still trading on the viewer's knowledge of the earlier film. It was, at any rate, the first time I was shocked out of the movie, right there in the theater, with the awareness of how crudely Dory had just called back to Nemo, disrupting its own narrative integrity for no gain. I am sorry to report that it was not the last time I had this feeling.
The body of the movie plays out, for the most part, as themes and variations on Finding Nemo - close enough that you can map a lot of the beats onto the earlier film, far enough that it doesn't come across as a pure retread. Dory has an unexpected flash of a memory - just enough to start to figure out where she might have lost her parents so long ago, and instantly sets off to find them, with Marlin and his son Nemo (Hayden Rolence) in tow. Hitching a ride with the turtles who featured into the last film, they cross the Pacific in hardly the blink of an eye - one of the more prominent missteps in the new movie, given what a film-length ordeal it was just to round the east coast of Australia last time - the trio ends up at the Marine Life Institute in Morro Bay, California. Accident causes Dory to end up inside the Institute, still questing to find her parents, while Marlin and Nemo work to find their way inside to rescue her. It lacks for the grandeur of Nemo's exploration of the ocean, stretching out to the edges of the frame, but I think the limited scale works to Dory's favor: it creates a different kind of environment to explore, and generally more interesting physical challenges for the characters to overcome.
Insofar as Finding Dory follows Dory's attempt to navigate the Institute, it's a mostly charming adventure-comedy. The film's new set of characters aren't quite at the top of the scale for sidekicks in Pixar movies, but they're pretty delightful company: Destiny the whale shark (Kaitlin Olson) - the screenplay by director Andrew Stanton and Victoria Strouse, undoubtedly with contributions from dozens of people inside Pixar doesn't seem to be aware that whale sharks are sharks, not whales, alas - and Bailey the beluga (Ty Burrell) are good-natured additions to the film's "with help and support, you can overcome your physical limitations" message, as well as charmingly-designed figures (Destiny seems purposefully built to be the model for an oversized plush toy). The new star, no question, is Hank the seven-armed octopus, a paranoid, skulking sort played with maximum crabby old man sharpness by Ed O'Neill, and subject to an inventive array of gags involving octopodes' ability to change color to blend into their backgrounds, stretched to exaggerated ends. Dory's chase through the pipes and displays of the Institute to find what happened to her blue tang clan never rises above the level of "delightful kids' movie shenanigans" - but it is delightful, and then some.
Meanwhile, the film frequently checks in with Marlin and Nemo, and it dies there. It's not that the animation is weaker, nor the gag construction (there's a great scene involving a fountain spitting jets of water, this film's version of the jellyfish forest from Nemo), and through this subplot we get to meet another set of wonderful new characters - Fluke (Idris Elba) and Rudder (Dominic West), a pair of territorial sea lions who draw from the "mine! mine!" seagulls in Nemo while adding a level of low-rent London gangster comedy, and the frazzled, unspeaking, possibly psychotic common loon Becky. We also have to cope with how badly this film fucks up Marlin and Nemo, and how unpleasant it is to spend any time with them. The problem is one of balancing tones: in Finding Nemo, Marlin was the straight man, and Dory was the comic relief. Now that Dory has been elevated to straight man status, Marlin fills the roll of comic relief, except he's still a straight man, which gives his character no particular function. Beyond that, his personality has been rolled back from the last film: he's neurotic and overprotective again, this time with a weird bullying streak. Nemo's solitary function, meanwhile, is to be a humorless moral scold, glowering at Marlin constantly. All the time spent with Marlin and Nemo is time wasted, even when it's in support of decent comedy.
The need to force Marlin into Finding Nemo is the worst thing about it as sequel, and probably also the most inevitable. In general, the film is too anxious to incorporate characters from last time, even when they don't fit (though the post-credits scene, which serves no other purpose than to do exactly this, is a marvel), and Marlin is the worst of it - not that he couldn't fit into the new film's story, but that all of the choices made by the filmmakers ensure that he doesn't. It's terribly for Finding Dory's pace, for its comedy, even for its emotional appeal, given how one-note and shrill all of of the Marlin/Nemo scenes are, and how much the detract from the none-too-penetrating sentiment of the Dory scenes.
It is disappointing that Stanton of all people should be responsible for this mismanagement of rhythm and mood: WALL·E has some of the finest blending of raw emotion with chase-based comedy in Pixar's stable, and it's the thing Finding Dory does worst. Its big thriller finale is gaudy and overdone, and by the time the slow-motion and Louis Armstrong kick in, it feels like we're watching something much too cheap to be graced with even the now-tarnished Pixar brand name; and while DeGeneres does a fine job of rebooting the character to be a sentimental lead (though I think she did better at letting hints of tragedy sneak out of the clowning around she did in the first film), there's not much that positions this film to be have the richness of feeling that used to be Stanton's great strength.
None of which is to say that Finding Dory is a failure - it's immensely likable and sincere, and often very funny - the sea lions are terrific, and real-life actor Sigourney Weaver is turned into a thoroughly unexpected running joke that keeps paying off no matter how many how times the screenplay revisits it. Its contrivances and violations of biology and good sense (which are many) come across in the spirit of good fun, and it's beautiful to look at, of course - not as creative as Inside Out nor as vivid as The Good Dinosaur, but there's nothing in here to risk Pixar's status as the most technically accomplished animation studio in the world. It's a safe movie, though, one too-obviously calculated to hit its marks as a sequel, and while I think that Stanton and company did a fine job of exploring new territory with this film, I also don't believe for a second that the story preceded the marketing impetus.
7/10
16 comments:
Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.
Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.
Is it safe to bet on Moana to win Best Animated feature now?
ReplyDeleteI actually think my money would be on Zootopia, unless people go absolutely apeshit for the songs in Moana the way they did for "Let It Go". Or for Hamilton.
ReplyDeleteBut it's a Disney vs. Disney battle at this point, for sure.
I trust Musker and Clements to make a better story than you'd expect. And to NOT do another twist villain.
ReplyDeleteI also trust Kubo to get nominated but not win despite being better than the other nominees except whichever indie joins it (Red Turtle, Loving Vincent, One of the GKIDS?).
I find myself inclined to agree with a lot of the criticisms here-Marlin and Nemo do not work especially well, the finale goes on way longer and far wilder than it can really sustain, and in general the movie just doesn't hold together as strongly as the original "Finding Nemo"-but I walked away from this one with its positives sticking on my mind much more so than its faults, and while part of that is how utterly charming the new characters (Hank especially, yes, but I give a lot of credit to Destiny too, whose relationship with Dory endeared itself to me very strongly), another part of it is how profoundly I found myself relating to Dory and her efforts at coping with her own memory loss, not only in terms of our glimpses into her life with her parents (far and away the movie's strongest overall material), but simply in the ways she navigates it the further into the institute she travels; I saw an awful lot of myself, and my own struggles with capital-a Anxiety, in things like Dory's fear of going somewhere people won't be able to consistently give her instructions on what to do next, or how she constantly needed to reach out to others to ground herself just by knowing they're there. Not just the action of doing it, but the language and feel of it...it's one of the more unique ways a movie's character has touched me, and I confess that more than anything else leaves me more positively disposed toward "Dory" than I might be otherwise. Dunno if that makes the movie any better, per se, but it means a lot t'me, at least.
ReplyDeleteAlso, yes, "Piper" was amazing, far and away the best short I've seen with a Disney/Pixar movie in what feels like forever.
"blue tang clan"
ReplyDeleteMan, I love you and I've never even met you.
Couple thoughts:
ReplyDelete- Hank is the most technically wonderful creation to come out of animation in recent memory. Basically an embodiment of the famous 12 Principles of Animation writ large.
- Animation, for some reason, rarely credits directors when it comes to the technical specifics of shotmaking. Well, Stanton should get more credit for the compositions in the Finding series, because they are a marvel. He positions aquatic creatures such that there is such head space and bottom space, seeming to innately know that this gives a sense of the enormity of the ocean and the otherworldly way in which things move and float and swim in such a gravity-less world. As a scuba diver, the way the camera nails that bobbing and weaving and borderless, multi-dimensionate free-space feeling we get under the sea is uncanny.
- I thought the climax was the most classic Pixarian thing to come from the studio in a while. I mean, it's obviously a nod to the original Toy Story, with characters trying to get in and out of a moving truck while another cast of characters helps and reacts and looks on from afar. Thers's also that Pixar staple of having screenplays spiral in on themselves, with callbacks to earlier throwaways and seemingly disparate elements being brought back full circle. Stanton seems to have gone to the old well, going back to the process Pixar used in its more naive days to break this story. I kinda loved it.
the screenplay by director Andrew Stanton and Victoria Strouse, undoubtedly with contributions from dozens of people inside Pixar doesn't seem to be aware that whale sharks are sharks, not whales, alas
ReplyDeleteJeez, really? That's just cringe-inducing. Ten-year-old me would've found it utterly intolerable. Not that it matters, I suppose, as I have no plans to see this, but still...
I didn't like it much at all, and what really killed it for me before I had a chance to warm up to it was the movie's obsession with canonizing the Marine Life Institute. Okay, in quite sure the MLI is a wonderful place that does great work, but think about it. If you went to a movie that took place at Sea World and spent nearly all of its time extolling the virtues of Area World and how Sea World is a great place for fish to be, your immediate assumptions would be a)Sea World paid a hell of a lot of money to be prominently placed in this movie and b)Sea World is absolutely NOT a great place for fish. It's a ninety minute product placement with a very slight adventure story strung along its length, and it rubbed me exactly the wrong way. Fucking Marlin and sarcastic asshole Nemo only made it ten times worse. Were it not for Hank, Becky and Baby Dory (the single most adorable character in Pixar since Wall-E), there would be nothing in this movie to praise at all.
ReplyDeleteI actually actively hate this movie. For me it's far more a 3/10, and it gets those points entirely on visuals. It started off with sickeningly sweet mugging, skipped the interesting part of the journey, and spent all its time on the laziest sort of contrived childrens' conflicts. Those can be done well, but I didn't feel that here. I just felt derailment, and spent the entire moving thinking, "I know they wanted me to think that was funny, but it wasn't." This was not helped in any way by being the sequel to a near flawless movie. The original is full of seemingly effortless grace, grandeur, and imagination. This was not that.
ReplyDeleteBut it looks like the majority of my species disagrees with me. :P
@moviemotorbreath:
ReplyDeleteMarine biologists everywhere would also like to remind you that blue tang clans ain't nuthin to fuck wit'.
I haven't seen this movie yet, but I liked Brave far more than The Good Dinosaur, so I'm hoping Dory will fall more towards the former than the latter for me.
ReplyDeleteI will say that the apparent confusion over "whale" and "whale shark" actually goes to explain why Dory speaks "whale" in a bizarre dialect.
ReplyDeleteI hadn't quite realized it before, but you're absolutely right that the Marlin/Nemo subplot is really the problem here. Dory's story is lovely and funny and incredibly valuable in the way it foregrounds the experience of disability in a way that kids can understand and relate to, but Marlin & Nemo just get in the way. They aren't actively bad, but they clutter things up, and make everything busier than it has to be, so the sad/sweet emotional parts don't get the oxygen they really need to be great.
ReplyDeleteNevertheless, I liked it a lot. It was super-pretty to look at (though it kind of paled after Piper), the character design was lovely and the animation job on Hank in particular was incredible--something which I don't think of as often with CG animation as I do with hand-drawn stuff. And I thought it was pretty hilarious and the big climax mostly worked really well despite it's utter ridiculousness. And even though I get leery of film criticism that focuses too much on point-scoring identity politics, I thought it was really cool to have a kids' movie that focused on mental disability so strongly, and then tossed in at least four other disabled characters like it was nothing (Destiny-almost blind, Nemo-little fin, Hank-missing a tentacle, Becky--mentally something-or-other, plus Bailey who just thinks he's disabled), and manages to have all of them figure out ways to prove themselves and gain self-confidence without making it obvious or cloying or too much of a cliched "you are special" kid message.
So count me in the positive camp. 7/10 sounds about right. And let's face it, if Pixar keeps making movies only this good for the next several years, they'll still be the best American studio out there.
"Though the post-credits scene, which serves no other purpose than to do exactly this, is a marvel." Oh that's very good!
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of Disney assets, is this the ugly side of the Devil's Deal having its day? Ideally Pixar would just release films when they're good and ready so as to continue the near unblemished former half of their filmography. But now they've got to crank them out with the regularity of superhero movies and it looks like that initial well of innovation is running dry. A more troubling conclusion is, it's nothing to do with their obligations to Disney and there's an issue over vision at the upper eschelons of Pixar itself, and they might need some new blood. That said, if we have to go through one or two duds to get to a legitimate masterpiece like Inside Out, maybe that's fine. (Doesn't bode well for attaching appendices onto the perfect resolution of the Toy… Story.)
@Sssonic - I'm with you 100% about identifying with Dory's emotional journey. There is a sequence 2/3s of the way through when things look their bleakest, and I thought the screenwriting and Dory's decision-making during that period was very real and very moving. Of the multiple parts that reduced me to a blubbering wreck, that was the one that created the most wreckage. What a wonderful surprise of a movie that I was slightly dubious about walking into.
ReplyDeleteOn Marlin and Nemo, I don't think I was as bothered by their B-plot interludes. Marlin didn't seem much different to me than the first film, where I found him equally acerbic and kind of unpleasant, only there's less of him in this one. I also appreciated Nemo's presence as audience surrogate telling him to chill out. I can understand why one might wish to excise those bits entirely, though.
I liked this film - it was beautiful, bright and engaging with fun new characters and a strong emotional core. Piper was so inordinately charming, gorgeous and wonderful that it couldn't hope to compete, but it was still very good. I agree that Nemo and Marlin were especially one-note, with Nemo in particular irritating me. For a fish that last time was impetuous and not always in the right, I found it falling that he seemed to position himself as the moral compass of the clownfishes. Marlin may be being a bit of a dick, but you aren't always an angel either, says I.
ReplyDeleteThe lesson about dealing with and managing disability was pleasingly gentle and well-handled. What surprised and slightly perhaps disappointed me was the decision to have her parents actually be alive. The scene in the 'Open Ocean' and those after nicely posited the idea that her parents may be already gone and I was expecting an aesop about surrogate family. Nemo and Marlin are Dory's family in many ways and I was expecting the moral to be that, with them, 'you already found your family'. I wondered if Ellen Degeneres, being an excellent pioneer for LGBT issues, might have agreed to a sequel that teaches about the value of non-traditional family, so I was actually a bit disappointed (as well as relieved for Dory herself) that the story didn't go in this direction.
The party I attended with decided to leave during the credits and I am now furious to discover that there was a scene after the credits. Still, we did catch the frankly bizarre Sia song, which sounded ridiculously like a Bond theme. Can we expect Daniel Craig's successor to premier with the film 'Septapussy'?