21 August 2016

MEAT AND GREET

Revised so much from my original review at the Film Experience that it's no longer fair to consider them the same piece of writing

On the one hand, it's profoundly unfair to attack a movie like Sausage Party for the quality of its animation. The whole point of the Disney-Pixar business model is that you spend a gargantuan pile of money to make an even more gargantuan pile back; the reason those studios' films look so good is that cost well over a hundred million dollars even at their cheapest, which means they need to make several hundred million dollars to turn a profit. Take a step down in budget, and you see the same thing with DreamWorks; another step down (but keep the giant box office windfalls) and you're at Illumination. You can't do that with an adults-only cartoon; they are by their nature going to be hugely limited in appeal. The $30 million (or $19 million, depending on which report you trust: pennies either way) it cost to make Sausage Party is close to the maximum that could possibly be spent on it by any producer with a serious interest in ever seeing a profit, and if you're going to insist on making a film using fully-rendered CGI (and if you're not, here in the 2010s marketplace, you're going to limit your appeal even further), $30 million simply isn't going to buy very much.

On the other hand, Sausage Party looks, like, really bad. Direct-to-video mockbuster bad. Not one surface, whether it is made of wood nor metal nor flesh and blood, fails to looks like it has been covered in plastic glaze; several characters' eyes appear to be exposed several F-stops brighter than the rest of their bodies. One particular character, a talking crunchy taco shell, has an entire face that feels like it's been glued to her using the Photoshop smear tool. Again, this is unfair, but understanding why the thing is does not excuse it. This is, by the way, exactly why the stranglehold 3-D CG animation has on the American theatrical market pisses me off: dirty cartoons from Ralph Bakshi to South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut have found ways to make cost-cutting measures at least look like a deliberate style. You can't do that with CGI: it's pretty much either good or bad, at least as long as it's done in the "ape natural lighting and real-world physics" mode that pretty much invariably happens.

But anyway, here I am talking about the animation in Sausage Party, and isn't that silly. The film is, of course, making all sorts of waves for how edgy and whatnot it is: a not-quite-parody and not-quite-satire of the Pixar-style premise of a secret world where inanimate objects have an elaborate culture unseen by humans, and in this case speak unbelievably dirty lines of dialogue and have wildly acrobatic animated sex. Which is where the comedy comes in, and I suppose it even works: comedy is, after all, the art of unexpected juxtapositions that shock us into laughter. The handful of writers - though bro-auteurs Seth Rogen & Evan Goldberg are quite obviously the ringleaders - know the Pixar model inside and out, from the abrupt switch between sentiment and goofiness to the third-act chase scene, and they alternate between using and mocking these conventions with a fairly high level of success. Insofar as the joke is "this is Toy Story but they talk about fucking and drugs", Sausage Party could not be a better riff, which is all it theoretically takes to make the joke work.

Theoretically. Now, it isn't mine to tell people that what they're laughing at isn't funny, because humor is that most subjective of all things. And the giddiness of the movie is charming and amusing, and I laughed. I did not laugh hard, nor often. In part this is because, to a significant extent, "this is Toy Story but they talk about fucking and drugs" really is the primary gag - the opening 10 minutes or so are an especially dire case of the movie doing nothing whatsoever for a laugh other than dropping in F-bombs, on the grounds that, hell, isn't seeing a toyetic cartoon character say "fuck" for no reason funny? And it is. Once. After which point we've gotten the joke. If I can go to the most obvious possibly comparison point, how about South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut? That film's creators, Trey Parker & Matt Stone, make a big show of their inaugural "fuck", and then they never again uses that as the joke in and of itself. The joke of something like "Uncle Fucka" is precisely that neither farts nor cursing are actually funny until ramped up to such a degree of absurdity that they cease to mean anything. Sausage Party mostly seems to think that cursing is actually funny, and instead of complicating it, a great deal of the humor is just about escalating it to ever cruder, grander heights. And even there, South Park has it beat: that film understands that if you have a movie full of F-bombs, the climactic joke isn't a whole lot of F-bombs, the climactic joke is that "Barbra Streisand" is the ultimate curse word.

But still, it's quite fearless, that escalation; you can kind of see the wildly over-the-top ending coming from a fair distance away, but the joyful enthusiasm with which the filmmakers pursue it, abandoning even the slightest hint of taste or restraint, is hard to argue against. You can tell that they were a bit ecstatic to make this, ecstatic that they could get away with so very much and do it in a way that's so unbelievably generous to the characters. It's really quite sweet, in fact. I still don't find it funny, but it's sweet.

The film, anyway, follows the travails of a hot dog named Frank (Rogen) who lives on a grocery store shelf next to a sexy hot dog bun named Brenda (Kristin Wiig) - like, unacceptably sexy, with a curvy ass and giant boobs and a mouth shaped like a tight vagina, and it's a uniquely off-putting attempt to do the whole "sexy lady version of a gender-neutral thing" trend, which is maybe the joke? I don't think it's a joke. Anyway the pair shamelessly flirts, and talk about what will happen when one of the Gods puts them in a shopping cart and takes them to the Great Beyond outside the store, where Frank will finally be able to slide up inside Brenda. But as a honey mustard jar (Danny McBride) who was returned to the store reveals, the Great Beyond is a nightmarish hell where the Gods are interested only in eating the sentient beings they have purchased, and he causes an accident that leaves Frank and Brenda cast outside of their respective packages and forced to navigate the store to find their way back home. Meanwhile, they are pursued by an asshole douche (Nick Kroll) convinced that Frank is responsible for leaving him bent and broken. Along the way, they pick up a trio of shocking ethnic stereotypes that I think the film thinks it's playing with ironically, though there's no onscreen evidence backing this up: Kareem Abdul Lavash (David Krumholtz) and Sammy Bagel, Jr. (Edward Norton), who despite his name is a pretty unambiguous Woody Allen nebbish type, who between them re-enact the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the closeted lesbian Teresa del Taco (Salma Hayek). It's kind of mystifying, really, the number of ethnic stereotypes Sausage Party trots out like it's no big thing: the wise old Indian figure, a bottle of spirits named Firewater (Bill Hader), is easily the most weirdly, distractingly terrible but it's the brief cameo appearance of several Chinese sauce bottles, speaking in wholly unapologetic Engish, that wins "most unecessarily awful" honors. I half-wonder if this is in there so the folks progressive enough to remain unoffended by the sexual and religious libertinism can still be mortally offended, because let's be perfectly clear, Sausage Party is very much the kind of movie that intends to claim a victory if it leaves any viewer offended for any reason.

So all of that happens, alongside a subplot concerning the horror-movie violence that befalls food once it reaches a human kitchen, and at least the film has the courage of its convictions. It also has what has become the de rigueur Rogen/Goldberg attempt at Philosophical Depth. Not the whole Israeli-Palestinian thing, which is frankly just forced and dumb, though at least it assumes its target audience has a functioning understanding of international politics, and that's rare territory for such a broad bit of American-made entertainment. No, it's the thing where Frank learns the truth about the food world's religion of being chosen by the Gods to see the holiness outside of the grocery store, that their entire system is a damnable lie, and tries to reveal this truth to everyone, annoying the hell out of Brenda in the process. It's a smart enough parable of the way that religion starts out reasonable and productive before turning sectarian and puritanical, and how loudmouthed atheists needs to cool it on the arrogance if they want to point those things out, and it's worked organically into the fabric of the adventure narrative. It's not really groundbreaking - like the theology in the same team's This Is the End, a film which Sausage Party resembles in many incidental ways, this feels very much like the kind of stoner profundity that is awe-inspiring to a bright but lazy undergraduate. That is to say, the film's target audience.

Which is also to say, not me, and I return to the point: you can't tell people that what they're laughing at isn't funny, and the crowd I saw Sausage Party with loved it. I do not begrudge their love, though I sure as hell don't share it. The film is a clever enough subversion of stock animation tropes, I suppose, though the concept doesn't really go beyond what a 10-minute short - or hell, even a trailer - could do with the same basic material. It's shocking and therefore funny when cartoons curse and perform oral sex - ultimately, this is the film's vision for what "adult animation" looks like. In Japan, where "adult animation" is about as bold and groundbreaking a concept as vanilla ice cream, they get things like Kon Satoshi's Paprika and Miyazaki Hayao's The Wind Rises. We get animated films like that in America, too: complicated studies of human beings with philosophical depths that no child, no matter how precocious, could fully appreciate. You know, films like Inside Out. Sausage Party is a film for witty, urbane, politically-minded adolescents - but still adolescents. It is what it is, anyway, and I'm happy for the people that it makes happy. At the very least, it's better for American film culture that this exists than if it didn't.

6/10

12 comments:

  1. The filmmakers were smart enough to put the best scene -- the kitchen reveal of the horror of the truth -- into the trailer, which got me to purchase a ticket.

    But....eesh, yeah, I LIKE this kind of movie, and I feel like it just fundamentally wasn't very funny. I think the fact that it was animation really worked against it: even when films like Pineapple Express and This Is The End falter, they can fall back on the likeability and physical comedy of folks like Seth Rogan James Franco and Craig Robinson to provide some base level of amusement. But when Sausage Party falters -- and it does a lot by being lazy and resting on sheer crudeness -- there's just nothing but ugly animation onscreen.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That is SO the best scene. All those words, and I never got around to mentioning that the film is at its best when it's depicting violence rather than sex & language (my second-favorite scene is the Saving Private Ryan parody).

    I think your second point is also really great, and I'd like to gnaw on it for a while.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why will kids not fully appreciate Inside Out? Kids dont understand politics and religion etc. But they get emotions. Everyone understands emotions and Depression. To say they dont is a dismissal of children's intellect.


    Im also not a big fan of South Park in general. The message of almost every single episode (including Bigger, Longer and Uncut) is "Caring about things is stupid, the only way to live is detached acceptance of the status quo and if you try to change things, for good or bad, then YOU are the villain" which is frankly a regressive message. The only reason South Park is big is because it was always the first to
    get there and say its bit.

    ReplyDelete
  4. J.S: Sure, kids get emotions, but the film is also about growing up. Which is something no child has done yet.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @J.S: I think that the word "fully" is critical here. Children are unlikely to fully appreciate the film's subtext about the loss of childhood and the onset of adolescence if they haven't already been there themselves (and appreciation is not the same thing as merely recognising that the subtext is indeed there).

    Sausage Party...as unpleasant and freaky as I find the whole concept of anthropomorphic food (and not just here; I similarly don't go for it when advertisers have their edible products dance and sing Marvin Gaye numbers) I have to admit that the unexpectedly good reviews have really piqued my interest in this project. I'm sure that it's not the kind of film that benefits from an overthinking of its world's internal logic; nevertheless, does it ever address what I see as the central irony that food products are already comprised of dead things that have been cut up and processed (in a hot dog's case, god-knows-what)?

    ReplyDelete
  6. J.S.: Everyone understands emotions and Depression.

    No, I'm going to have to call bullshit here. Quite a lot of adults don't understand depression: Inside Out's whole "sadness is normal and healthy, depression is a comprehensive and debilitating lack of affect, not excessive unhappiness" is kinda depression 101, but it's something that people don't just somehow intuitively understand. Which, you know, hey, putting that explanation in a kids' movie is good! Kids, like everyone, should know this. But it's a lesson, not a piece of background material.

    I'm mostly with Quixotess and Scampy re why Inside Out provides more to an adult audience than a kids' one in general. But I think the point about depression needed to be made.

    ReplyDelete
  7. With the caveat that I've only seen the trailer, I get the impression that Seth Rogan feels about Pixar the way that Brett Ratner feels about rehearsing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. On the Inside Out discussion, I think what J.S. is saying is that children know what it is to be happy, what it is to be sad, angry, afraid or disgusted, so that gives them a much more natural entry to connect with that film and absorve its message (which is an important one for both kids and parents). I've been saying since last year that Inside Out is an essential for kids to learn about their emotions and for parents to have these conversations with their kids (conversations they try to avoid because, just like Joy, they just want them to be happy).

    I haven't seen Sausage Party yet (it won't be arriving where I live for a few more weeks), but I'm curious to see it (even though I'm pretty sure I won't like it all that much)...

    ReplyDelete
  9. I like that the vast majority of comments for this review are about Inside Out, which is worth talking about over and over again. Sausage Party is really not.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "This is, by the way, exactly why the stranglehold 3-D CG animation has on the American theatrical market pisses me off: dirty cartoons from Ralph Bakshi to South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut have found ways to make cost-cutting measures at least look like a deliberate style. You can't do that with CGI:.."

    Totally agree with you here, Tim. But I do think The Peanuts Movie was a nice compromise for a film with CGI imposed on very 2D characters. The Peanuts characters still very much look like the Peanuts characters, but in sentient plushy form.

    ReplyDelete
  11. saw this last night. good adult animation, although it tries too hard. I did not know in advance that Alan Menken was involved and wrote one of his trademark numbers for the film.

    What did you think of it?

    ReplyDelete

Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.

Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.