31 August 2016
SEPTEMBER 2016 MOVIE PREVIEW
First, the mea culpa: I'm as aware as anybody as to how many films behind I am from the summer-that-has-ended, and I am very eager to get to them as soon as possible. But "as soon as possible" isn't that soon, because it turns out that one of the perks of being a graduate student at UW-Madison is that sometimes they select you to go on a trip to the Telluride Film Festival. Which is certainly one of the cooler things I've done this year. Or lifetime. Sadly, they do not let you review the Telluride Film Festival, so I won't be able to talk about all the movies I see over the weekend, but I wanted to let you all know why it would be, unforgivably, at least another full week before I'm able to render my considered, weighty thoughts on Ben-Hur mk. 3. Which will probably not benefit from the comparison
(I'm hopeful that I can find a few free hours for other blogging, but if this place seems a little desolate for the next few days, that's why).
But hey, on to September! The fairly mild, middling summer behind us, it's on to the brief lull in between the popcorn movies and the Oscarbait. Although in this lull, there's even one film I'm honest-to-God super-excited for...
2.9.2016
...and that would be The Light Between Oceans, the new film directed by Derek Cianfrance, whose Blue Valentine remains my standard-bearer for romantic dramas in the 2010s. And that's without even adding in a pair of actors I virtually always adore in the form of Michael Fassbender and Rachel Weisz (and an actor I enthusiastically tolerate in the form of Alicia Vikander). Presumably, if this was actually as good as I wanted it to be, it would be getting a more prestigious release weekend, but hey! better than nothing.
There is also a bio-horror movie about a murderous test-tube baby coming out, Morgan, and that sure does sound like a Labor Day weekend movie, alright.
9.9.2016
Tell me "Clint Eastwood directing Tom Hanks", and I am instantaneously interested. Continue on to explain that Sully is the story of Captain "Sully" Sullenberger, and I just get confused. Like... is there actually enough content to make a feature film here? He landed a crashing plane, was found blameless, and everyone loves him. How does dramatic conflict even start to enter into this situation? Why is this more than 10 minutes long? It is a bafflement and no mistake.
And there are two horror movies, which seems profoundly misguided: The Disappointments Room, about a haunted attic, is almost certainly going to be better than When the Bough Breaks, about the psychotic biological father of a surrogate baby, but surely they're going to devour each other, right?
A potential third horror movie comes along in the form of Belgian cartoon Robinson Crusoe, released in the States under the title The Wild Life - which already makes no sense whatsoever, from a marketing perspective alone - and which looks to be made out of the leftover animated zombies from the early mo-cap features from the 2000s.
16.9.2016
Third week in a row of horror! In this case, it's Blair Witch, which I believe is more in the line of a sequel to 1999's The Blair Witch Project than a remake, but I think we can reasonably wonder whether either of those things are necessary. The film (which was announced very late in the game, as a bit of fun) is getting fair enough buzz, but I am inordinately hostile to the hipster indie horror team of director Adam Wingard and writer Simon Barrett, so even given my inherent resistance to the project, this one has all my hackles raised.
Speaking of sequels nobody needed: was a third Bridget Jones picture actually on anybody's wish list? Because we've got one, in the form of Bridget Jones's Baby. I will assume that 12 years is long enough to wipe away the bad taste of Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason, though this doesn't strike me as an obvious nostalgia property, unless you yearn for the heady days of needlessly toothless British comedies larding up the movie theaters.
Along with the aforementioned Sully, the month's biggest "we wanted this to be an awards player, but it clearly won't be, damn" is surely Snowden, Oliver Stone's bid to return to politically-charged filmmaking, with Joseph Gordon-Levitt starring as famous and infamous document-leaker Edward Snowden. I am not at all unsympathetic to that story and this filmmaker's preoccupations meeting up in one place, but we must at this point seriously start to grapple with the question of when, exactly, Stone made his last good movie, or even a particularly tolerable one. Because it's definitely been more than a decade.
Lastly, my commitment to name-dropping every wide release film requires me to observe the Christian rock concert film Hillsong: Let Hope Rise, about which I'm sure you're all extremely interested.
23.9.2016
If there's any single bit of advertising prattle that I find obnoxious right now, it's the shamelessness of advertising Storks as "from the studio that delivered The Lego Movie" ("delivered" because storks, ha-ha), which is of course entirely true, except that the two films occupy functionally opposite poles of the commercial American animated landscape: Storks looks like the kind of crap Blue Sky used to try to put over in the mid-'00s, or whatever studio was next lower on the ladder than Blue Sky. Exactly the kind of movie that The Lego Movie existed to mock and show up, in other words.
We get a rare remake of a remake: The Magnificent Seven, an Antoine Fuqua version of the 1960 Western based upon Seven Samurai. If they could make it work once, I don't see why they can't make it work again, and I am certainly intrigued when you put Denzel Washington, Chris Pratt, and Ethan Hawke all in the same movie. On the other hand, Fuqua hasn't yet made a film I've especially cared for, and this looks a lot like an Antoine Fuqua picture for something set in the 19th Century.
30.9.2016
The month's second real-life tale of politically-significant history is Deepwater Horizon, based upon the 2010 explosion in the Gulf of Mexico that created the worst oil spill in history, a fact I will never forget because at the time I was working at a Whole Foods fish market, and we started a big promotion on Gulf shrimp like the week that the explosion took place, and every. Damn. Customer made the same bad jokes. Anyway, it's directed by Peter Berg, whose politics make him kind of the anti-Oliver Stone; the two men are alike only in that both of them are more talented than the movies they make would lead you to believe.
Learning about Masterminds the first time gave me whiplash: so much good comedy talent in the cast! Kate McKinnon in her first post-Ghostbusters role, now that I know to be excited for her! And it's a Jared Hess movie, which makes me feel like a kid on Christmas morning who saved the biggest box for last, and discovered that it was empty except for a solitary pair of socks.
Last and I hope not least, but it doesn't do to be optimistic is Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children, which is sort of like a British child's fantasy version of X-Men, near as I can tell, and it re-teams Tim Burton and Eva Green for the first time since she was so incandescent and intelligently campy in his otherwise tepid Dark Shadows. So the question becomes, is she his lucky charm, and this will be great? Or is it just that she enjoys showing off in terrible movies, and this will be godawful.Dear reader, I have my suspicions that it is not the former.
(I'm hopeful that I can find a few free hours for other blogging, but if this place seems a little desolate for the next few days, that's why).
But hey, on to September! The fairly mild, middling summer behind us, it's on to the brief lull in between the popcorn movies and the Oscarbait. Although in this lull, there's even one film I'm honest-to-God super-excited for...
2.9.2016
...and that would be The Light Between Oceans, the new film directed by Derek Cianfrance, whose Blue Valentine remains my standard-bearer for romantic dramas in the 2010s. And that's without even adding in a pair of actors I virtually always adore in the form of Michael Fassbender and Rachel Weisz (and an actor I enthusiastically tolerate in the form of Alicia Vikander). Presumably, if this was actually as good as I wanted it to be, it would be getting a more prestigious release weekend, but hey! better than nothing.
There is also a bio-horror movie about a murderous test-tube baby coming out, Morgan, and that sure does sound like a Labor Day weekend movie, alright.
9.9.2016
Tell me "Clint Eastwood directing Tom Hanks", and I am instantaneously interested. Continue on to explain that Sully is the story of Captain "Sully" Sullenberger, and I just get confused. Like... is there actually enough content to make a feature film here? He landed a crashing plane, was found blameless, and everyone loves him. How does dramatic conflict even start to enter into this situation? Why is this more than 10 minutes long? It is a bafflement and no mistake.
And there are two horror movies, which seems profoundly misguided: The Disappointments Room, about a haunted attic, is almost certainly going to be better than When the Bough Breaks, about the psychotic biological father of a surrogate baby, but surely they're going to devour each other, right?
A potential third horror movie comes along in the form of Belgian cartoon Robinson Crusoe, released in the States under the title The Wild Life - which already makes no sense whatsoever, from a marketing perspective alone - and which looks to be made out of the leftover animated zombies from the early mo-cap features from the 2000s.
16.9.2016
Third week in a row of horror! In this case, it's Blair Witch, which I believe is more in the line of a sequel to 1999's The Blair Witch Project than a remake, but I think we can reasonably wonder whether either of those things are necessary. The film (which was announced very late in the game, as a bit of fun) is getting fair enough buzz, but I am inordinately hostile to the hipster indie horror team of director Adam Wingard and writer Simon Barrett, so even given my inherent resistance to the project, this one has all my hackles raised.
Speaking of sequels nobody needed: was a third Bridget Jones picture actually on anybody's wish list? Because we've got one, in the form of Bridget Jones's Baby. I will assume that 12 years is long enough to wipe away the bad taste of Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason, though this doesn't strike me as an obvious nostalgia property, unless you yearn for the heady days of needlessly toothless British comedies larding up the movie theaters.
Along with the aforementioned Sully, the month's biggest "we wanted this to be an awards player, but it clearly won't be, damn" is surely Snowden, Oliver Stone's bid to return to politically-charged filmmaking, with Joseph Gordon-Levitt starring as famous and infamous document-leaker Edward Snowden. I am not at all unsympathetic to that story and this filmmaker's preoccupations meeting up in one place, but we must at this point seriously start to grapple with the question of when, exactly, Stone made his last good movie, or even a particularly tolerable one. Because it's definitely been more than a decade.
Lastly, my commitment to name-dropping every wide release film requires me to observe the Christian rock concert film Hillsong: Let Hope Rise, about which I'm sure you're all extremely interested.
23.9.2016
If there's any single bit of advertising prattle that I find obnoxious right now, it's the shamelessness of advertising Storks as "from the studio that delivered The Lego Movie" ("delivered" because storks, ha-ha), which is of course entirely true, except that the two films occupy functionally opposite poles of the commercial American animated landscape: Storks looks like the kind of crap Blue Sky used to try to put over in the mid-'00s, or whatever studio was next lower on the ladder than Blue Sky. Exactly the kind of movie that The Lego Movie existed to mock and show up, in other words.
We get a rare remake of a remake: The Magnificent Seven, an Antoine Fuqua version of the 1960 Western based upon Seven Samurai. If they could make it work once, I don't see why they can't make it work again, and I am certainly intrigued when you put Denzel Washington, Chris Pratt, and Ethan Hawke all in the same movie. On the other hand, Fuqua hasn't yet made a film I've especially cared for, and this looks a lot like an Antoine Fuqua picture for something set in the 19th Century.
30.9.2016
The month's second real-life tale of politically-significant history is Deepwater Horizon, based upon the 2010 explosion in the Gulf of Mexico that created the worst oil spill in history, a fact I will never forget because at the time I was working at a Whole Foods fish market, and we started a big promotion on Gulf shrimp like the week that the explosion took place, and every. Damn. Customer made the same bad jokes. Anyway, it's directed by Peter Berg, whose politics make him kind of the anti-Oliver Stone; the two men are alike only in that both of them are more talented than the movies they make would lead you to believe.
Learning about Masterminds the first time gave me whiplash: so much good comedy talent in the cast! Kate McKinnon in her first post-Ghostbusters role, now that I know to be excited for her! And it's a Jared Hess movie, which makes me feel like a kid on Christmas morning who saved the biggest box for last, and discovered that it was empty except for a solitary pair of socks.
Last and I hope not least, but it doesn't do to be optimistic is Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children, which is sort of like a British child's fantasy version of X-Men, near as I can tell, and it re-teams Tim Burton and Eva Green for the first time since she was so incandescent and intelligently campy in his otherwise tepid Dark Shadows. So the question becomes, is she his lucky charm, and this will be great? Or is it just that she enjoys showing off in terrible movies, and this will be godawful.Dear reader, I have my suspicions that it is not the former.
21 comments:
Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.
Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.
Are we excited that MORGAN features Anya Taylor-Joy as the monstrous title character, though? Because after THE WITCH, I'm intrigued.
ReplyDeleteso what, they make you sign a NDA for Telluride even though everybody and their momma is gonna be reviewing festival movies soon?
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of Oliver Stone, I should have had you review Nixon for that fundraiser. Ah well. Maybe in 2020.
ReplyDeleteThere is enough content there, Tim - as proven by Michael Moore's 'Capitalism : A Love Story' when, as soon as Sully wanted to use his public profile to highlight how depressingly underpaid and dangerously overworked pilots were, the establishment very soon expressed little interest in him. Of course, if the ending of 'American Sniper' is anything to go by, Mr. Eastwood won't be the slightest bit interested in telling that story.
ReplyDeleteI just can't get over the fact that somebody actually decided on the name "When the Bough Breaks". It's either really funny or really sad or I don't even know any more.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of remaking movies that have already been remade, they're not even waiting a decade to remake Nightmare on Elm Street and Friday the 13th again.
ReplyDelete@Jeremy - even the program list of Telluride is secret. It will be the first time some of those movies are shown, ever. Other people won't see them for a couple months. I guess the NDA lasts until then.
ReplyDeleteI am way more excited for Morgan than Light Between Oceans. Jesus, even that name sounds so fucking pretentious it makes me want to burn it to death. Also, Oceans is currently rotten on RT. I mean, so is Morgan, but of the two, I'd rather watch a horror-thriller about science gone wrong than a romantic drama. Because I ripped my heart out a long time ago and buried it. Now I get to live forever but feel nothing.
Not so much an NDA as a "it would make us happy if you don't do this", and when you're in grad school "it would make us happy" = "I will devour your immortal soul if you cross me".
ReplyDeleteTo be fair to Masterminds, Jared Hess is only directing it, and not writing it. Seems like this is his first big directing credit that he hasn't written.
ReplyDeleteAfter seeing the preview of Sully, my wife and I were joking that it's going to be 2 hours of Tom Hanks denying that he did anything heroic while an interviewer fawns over him.
ReplyDeleteWell, just give us a wink or two if Moonlight, La La Land, Arrival, and Manchester-By-The-Sea are as good as we hoped.
ReplyDeleteTelluride... sounds exciting! Wish I could go.
ReplyDeleteI'm still kind of moved by your "should have a good chunk of the fundraiser reviews done by Labour Day" statement.
ReplyDelete"I am inordinately hostile to the hipster indie horror team of director Adam Wingard and writer Simon Barret"
ReplyDeleteWhaaaat? Have you not seen The Guest? While being rather underwhelmed by their previous efforts, The Guest has earned them at least three features worth of goodwill.
@dr. Freudenstein,
ReplyDeleteI was a little taken aback by that as well. Not that I've seen anyone of Wingard's other works, but, as you said, The Guest has given him a blank cheque of good will for another few features at least.
Man, I must be alone in thinking The Guest was just ok. Not great, but fine.
ReplyDeleteNo, motorbreath, I'm with you. I enjoyed it, but it was only a solid 3/5 for me. The last act of the movie was very contrived, we've seen that sort of thing a million times. That it was well done doesn't change the fact that it was over-done.
ReplyDeletePretty good action-thriller, but that's about it.
@The Watcher,
ReplyDeleteI can respect that. It's not like the final action sequence was like The Raid or anything, but, I came in expecting a psychodrama based on the trailer and that's what The Guest started out as but by the final act it has gone completely off the rails and that's what I loved about it. The tongue in cheek bait and switch element is what set it apart in my opinion, coupled with a wicked sense of gallows humour.
@Travis - Ah, well maybe that's the difference. I had the "twist," as it were, spoiled for me, and went into the film knowing what to expect.
ReplyDeleteI'll split the difference and say The Guest was a reasonably robust 4/5 for me. Nothing that'll go down in cinema history, but fun as hell while it lasted and a big step up from You're Next.
ReplyDeleteSee, I actually enjoyed You're Next far more than The Guest. I felt like it had much more zest and zip to it, and didn't take itself nearly as seriously or dourly as Guest did, especially in the final act.
ReplyDeleteAt least You're Next had a badass female heroine turning the tables on home invaders. It's always so fun to watch the hunters gradually transform into the hunted.