04 October 2016

OCTOBER 2016 MOVIE PREVIEW

Typically, October is home to two things: horror movies and future Best Picture Oscar winners. Neither of those seem to apply this year, which is odd: certainly, the almost-complete abandonment of the month by horror is utterly peculiar (though it's also a late development: Rings was pushed back from a prime Halloween weekend slot just a couple of weeks ago, all the way to February, AKA "a promising sign that it no way tells us that the movie is a complete turd"). Frankly, I have no clue what the hell is going on this month, but it's got a few things that look pretty good, so let's dive in.


7.10.2016

And in fairness to the other half of my equation, Best Picture winners, it did seem for months that The Birth of a Nation, Nate Parker's epic about Nat Turner's slave rebellion, had a particularly strong angle on that prize. But then it turned out that Parker is a gratuitously unpleasant human being, and has a history with sexual violence which makes him at best a dubiously unreflective sort, and at worst makes him something that I won't say for fear that it's legally actionable. The vigor of the cultural conversation around rape makes it impossible to imagine that the film will be greeted with the hosannas that seemed its due back during Sundance, and awards glory seems right out, but I do think that the rarity of films about American slavery is such that it would probably still be worth seeing it. That being said, I know people who are planning to boycott it, and I think that's not unreasonable.

In much less fraught corners of the cinema world, we have Emily Blunt in a sort of Hitchcockian-looking thriller, The Girl on the Train, which is being marketed as close to Gone Girl on a Train as basic decency allows, and neither the director nor the screenwriter fill one with optimism. But hey, Emily Blunt in a thriller, this isn't difficult stuff. There's also a thing called Middle School: The Worst Years of My Life, which doesn't seem to be something that I nor anyone likely to be reading this blog needs to worry about very much.

Most importantly, by far, is the IMAX release of the short version of Terrence Malick's cosmology documentary Voyage of Time. Which IMAX screens in particular are getting the film seems to be an unanswerable question, even this close to the release date, though at very least if you live in Indianapolis you seem to be in luck.


12.10.2016

THE NEW GODZILLA PICTURE IS COMING OUT! HOLY FUCK, THERE IS A NEW JAPANESE GODZILLA PICTURE, AND IT'S COMING OUT JUST MONTHS AFTER IT OPENED IN JAPAN. I WAS ALL SET TO BOOTLEG IT BECAUSE I FIGURED IT WOULD BE, LIKE, TWO YEARS, AND INSTEAD I GET TO SEE IT RIGHT NOW.

14.10.2016

A weekend radiating confusion and flop sweat. The Accountant, with Ben Affleck as an autistic accountant who works for terrorists, is the obvious Grown Up Thriller for Grown Up Viewers, of the week if not the whole month (it seems, at any rate, statelier than The Girl on the Train), but it has that whole thing where the teaser trailer was great and the full trailer is kind of flat and literal-minded. And the one-two punch of Affleck and Anna Kendrick in the leads is a peerless case of people who can be good in the presence of a great script, director, or ideally both, but have both made plenty of missteps along the way.

The competition is dire. We have on the one hand a comedy concert film, Kevin Hart: What Now?, because stand-up films always work, and Kevin Hart isn't gruesomely over-exposed. And then there's a thing called Max Steel, which I think is kind of superhero-adjacent? And has a concept about a boy and his alien friend that feels like it's been sitting under a desk collecting dust since 1986.


21.10.2016

The dumping ground for apparently every single 2016 release they couldn't otherwise make room for. The no fewer than five wide release films coming out include the month's solitary horror film, Ouija: Origin of Evil, which reminds me among other things that they made that other Ouija movie which I forgot about immediately after it was in the rearview mirror. It's also set in the 1960s, apparently on the grounds that The Conjuring made money. The other big genre movie is Tyler Perry's Boo! A Madea Halloween, which should be fascinating - how to marry Perry's brand of soft-Baptist theology with a story in which the redoubtable Madea takes her unquenchable brand of belligerent moralising into the realm of the monster movie? I cannot imagine the film being good, and I can easily imagine it being the worst thing of Perry's career, but boy, am I intrigued.

Impressively, the weekend hosts another movie for religious audiences: I'm Not Ashamed, billed as the inspirational story of the first student killed in the Columbine massacre in 1999. Which is maybe not the most inspirational story out there? I get why, it's the whole stalwart Christian martyr thing, but this looks... questionable. I presume the family of the student in question has offered their permission to make this, which is the only thing keeping me from declaring this the most offensive concept for a movie in the 2010s to date, and I don't even know that the most morbid curiosity could get me to see it. But I am hella morbidly curious.

Rattling on down the line: Zach Galifianakis and Isla Fisher are a boring suburban couple who tangle with spies in Keeping Up with the Joneses, which is both a plot hook and a title that feel like they've been used at least four or five times already, but I guess comedians gotta eat, just like the rest of us. Last, and by absolutely no means least, is Jack Reacher: Never Go Back, the sequel to the unexpectedly delightful Tom Cruise action vehicle Jack Reacher from four years ago; it's the only thing here that I'm excited for in the remotest degree.

In limited release, Moonlight - which I've seen already, and can confirm is good in the ways you'd hope it would be good - will very probably be nominated for that aforementioned Oscar, but I do not suppose it has any real chance of winning it.


28.10.2016

Remember how Tom Hanks played that boring Indiana Jones knock-off in a couple of movies a decade ago? For some reason, they've brought him back in Inferno, and it has the weekend all to itself. Oh well, happy Halloween.

19 comments:

  1. I'm also excited to see the new Japanese Godzilla picture. Love it or hate it, I assume we have Gareth Edwards' reboot from 2014 to thank for the timely Stateside release, as we did Roland Emmerich's much-maligned 1998 venture for the release of Godzilla 2000. Other issues in 2016 aside, it's amazing how far the mainstream has come in its views of foreign cinema. Despite being a reactionary reply to Emmerich's film, the suits behind the American release of G2K just couldn't help editing the film and dubbing it with goofy dialogue and "comedy", as with the G-films of old. Fast-forward to 2016 and we're getting Shin Godzilla uncut and subtitled instead of dubbed (I believe). Side note, but I wonder why they changed the title from Godzilla: Resurgence to its current one? Likely to avoid confusion on the part of those that might (rightfully) interpret such a title as the film being a sequel to the 2014 film, but the final wording is still awkward. It seems to be a literal translation, which is fine. Originally New World Cinemas was announced to be the distributor, but they since recalled their statements and FUNimation was awarded the rights instead. Perhaps the more Americanized title was NWC's doing and the Powers That Be just didn't care for their plans for the new film?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, I was clicking through my theater's coming attractions in hopes of finding some forgotten horror movie for Halloween, and my head almost exploded when I saw Shin Godzilla. It could be All Monsters Attack 2 and I'd be calling for a national holiday; the Hideaki Anno angle only makes it more irresistible.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yay for new Godzilla! A friend of mine who lives in Hong Kong saw it, and he said it's something like a kaiju picture meets bureaucratic satire in the vein of In the Loop or Veep. Which, hey, I'm up for it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hard to put into words how excited I am about Moonlight. I get teary eyed thinking about the goddamn trailer, its sounds, its images, its feelings it evokes.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I've heard nothing but good things about Shin Godzilla, myself. It's been too long since we've had a genuine Japanese entry in the franchise and even longer since we had one that was worth the time to watch (in my opinion, Final Wars was quite garish, give or take a few amusing sequences). 2001's Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All-Out Attack was a genuinely great movie, much less a great daikaiju film (save for that cringe-worthy wopper of a title). I'm hoping for something on that level, particularly since this is only the third time in sixty years that the big lizard hasn't shared the screen with any monster co-stars or opponents (unless I'm mistaken, but everything I've heard about the film indicates that it's Gojira and Gojira alone).

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm so incredibly hyped for Shin Godzilla that... Isn't playing within 90 minutes of here? Well fuck me then.

    Wait, did they actually make a movie about the thoroughly debunked myth that girl saying yes to believing in God and being shot for it? Seriously? This is a story that was debunked twenty fucking years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I already saw and reviewed The Birth of a Nation and it is such a disappointing movie as all hell. If it gets nominated, I will be very very mad.

    Also seeing Voyage of Time tomorrow - and making an hour-long drive to catch it - so I can't stop shaking even though I'm trying to go through my homework early so I don't worry about it later this week when I have a lot more screenings to sit through.

    As a Miami native, I am very very very envious that you saw Moonlight while our local GEMS festival offshoot from the Miami Film Festival didn't receive it. I'm waiting way too hard with way too bated breath for it.

    The most depressing thing to me about Boo! A Madea Halloween (other than the fact that my ex-girlfriend worked on it, so I have that to remind me of its existence) is how it literally exists because Chris Rock made a joke in Top Five and somehow Tyler Perry thought a joke at his expense was a good basis for a whole film production.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh and Max Steel is based on a CG tv show from my childhood that I not only did not remember a single other thing about except that it involved extreme sports and the white lead had a black father, but the moment I heard the name, I mistook it for ANOTHER CG tv show Action Man. When the trailer came out, I got curious enough on the name recognition to check it out and nothing I recalled from either shitty series was there, so it's unrecognizable entirely.

    That should tell you enough about how this is probably not gonna be a hit.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I mean, at least this Ouija prequel is written and directed by the guy who made Oculus (pretty good but also infuriating) and Hush (genuinely pretty good).

    Of course, Flanagan also made Before I Wake, but hopefully that's just a weird misfire and not the start of a trend.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I will second the weirdness of a Max Steel movie even existing, though to add to the weirdness it was apparently remade as a Netflix kids series.

    It is proof that anything from our childhoods will be rebooted.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Roman Polanski's history of sexual violence sure as shit didn't scare the Academy.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Its "easier' for Polanski and Allen cuz they're 1. white and 2. well-established titans in American cinema. They already had some of the greatest American movies of all-time on their resume, been nominated/awarded many times. Its the difference between a guy with 20 years of exceptional experience getting another job after a scandal and a new hire with no experience or references.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Also worth pointing out that was 13 years ago and the fight against rape culture has gotten much more public and aggressive since then.

    Which is a good thing.

    I'm just slightly bothered by the fact that Parker was found not guilty, which seems to be meaningless in the sudden attention this has gotten. But I don't know the details of the case at all, and holy fuck did he come off as a douchebag on Sixty Minutes.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Boycotting is also a strange way to punish him. "Let's hurt the 2000 people who worked on a movie in order to hurt one man." I guess the only alternative is "personally punch Parker in the face," but at least that would be more precise and not involve so much collateral damage. The thing is, a boycott would be a lot more justifiable in the case of any new Polanski or Allen film: their scandals (in Polanski's case, proven actual crimes) have long been public knowledge and anyone funding or working with those men can be conclusively presumed to know about their directors' reputations, and to have taken them into consideration when they signed on the line that is dotted. In the case of Parker's collaborators, that isn't nearly as reasonable a presumption, and I'd have to feel bad for them if they were harmed by his crime.

    But, still: at the end of the day, it's not anybody's duty to go see a fucking movie. You can skip out on The Birth of a Nation for any reason or no reason. Since seeing the trailers, which made it look like a grey-on-brownish-grey TV docudrama, I'm a lot, lot less excited for it than I was based on the title and the premise, and if I don't get around to seeing it in theaters, while I happily enjoy Jack Reacher 2, I also can't say I care.

    P.S.: If Indianopolis gets Voyage of Time and Pittsburgh doesn't, then I can only hope that God simply smites this Steel Sodom with his mighty hand.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Shin Godzilla ftw!
    Also looking beyond October: just saw the trailer for Jordan Peele's upcoming horror film Get Out. And all I can think is: "please let this be good. Please let this be good. Please let this be good. Please let this be good."

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'm terrifically excited for MOONLIGHT. Stories about queer POC are vanishingly rare in US films, Tarell Alvin McCraney (on whose play it's based) is one of the best playwrights working today, and the trailer is gorgeous. (Also, I love love love Janelle MonĂ¡e.) I'm so excited to see it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I'm just slightly bothered by the fact that Parker was found not guilty, which seems to be meaningless in the sudden attention this has gotten.

    Not to trying to start a whole argument rehashing the case, but the 'not guilty' in this case does seem to be kinda meaningless, and granted solely because Parker had previously had a relationship with the woman. Another man raped her simultaneously, and was found guilty – it seems impossible for two men to be in the same room at the same time and have sex with the same unconscious woman, and only one of those committed rape.

    ReplyDelete
  18. If I'm not mistaken, the other conviction was later overturned.

    ReplyDelete
  19. @Brian

    The overturned conviction was also on a technicality rather than any actual evidence.

    Here's the thing: I don't think anybody needs to be reminded of Penn State's history with rape cases. The idea that Parker and Celestin would be protected as athletes is not something that should be shocking.

    But other than the already shady results of the cases, what should really be alarming is both the testimony of Tamerlane Kargas where he states that Parker invited him and Celestin in to have sex with the plaintiff despite the plaintiff clearly not moving (https://e.issuu.com/issuu-reader3-embed-files/latest/twittercard.html?u=pmcderek&d=kangas_testimony&p=0) and the transcript of a call between the plaintiff and Parker where the plaintiff expresses complete confusion and unclear memories about the night they had sex explaining that she was numb (https://pmcdeadline2.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/callexcerpt-wm.pdf), most horrifyingly the point where she asks if Parker invited Celestin and Parker lies and says "No" and gives her unclear answers as to how she had sex with Celestin and Parker.

    The dude is pretty much guilty as far as I am concerned and anybody who reads these court documents that are available online should be able to tell so too. And if the civil complaint against Penn State by Jane Doe is anything to believe (https://pmcdeadline2.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/civil-complaint-2-wm.pdf), Parker and Celestin's actions and behaviors during and after the case are fucking. ghastly. If those complaints are true, no wonder she commit suicide.

    I can't imagine why anybody would defend Nate in the slightest. I think he has an awareness of what he's done and how wrong it is and I might have more respect for him if actually went and spoke out about educating men in college about consent and how necessary it is, but the motherfucker's statements are so awfully self-centered and all his interviews just shoot himself in the foot with his douchebaggery.

    ReplyDelete

Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.

Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.