09 November 2016
HE'S A MAGIC MAN
Historically, Marvel Studios films have suffered from subpar visual effects. Not bad visual effects; it's just that their CGI has a tendency to stumble at inopportune moments. So here is the first nice thing to say about Doctor Strange: the effects are absolutely stunning. Certainly the best in Marvel's history, maybe the best in any comic book movie ever made, and if not for the insurmountable bar of The Jungle Book, the best in the first ten and a quarter months of 2016.
That's a good thing, because the effects in Doctor Strange are kind of all it has. The story is pedestrian, the characters one-note, the central conflict fuzzy, and comic relief is easily the worst to have show up in the Marvel Cinematic Universe since its inauguration. But the spectacle! It's not quite the Doctor Strange movie of my dreams as a fan of the comic book character - too much grey in the color palette and not enough over-the-top weirdness. Though its two major weird sequences are its very best moments, especially the first, a perhaps inadvertent (but I doubt it) homage to the "beyond the infinite" sequence in 2001: A Space Odyssey that's the most off-kilter and thus delightful moment in any MCU film since the 2011 Captain America: The First Avenger found room for a campy musical number. The point, though, is that even if this is a bit drab in the color palette, the film's visuals are still beyond amazing in their own right. Any fear that this would just be Marvel's Inception can be put to rest: while involving many of the same concepts (rooms spinning and fragmenting, cities folding in on themselves), Doctor Strange brings new stuff to the table - all of the spatial warping is based on the mirror principles of a kaleidoscope, which sounds like a little thing until you're watching it - and also does the same stuff much better (as six years of evolving technology will do for you).
So with all that in mind, does the rest of it actually matter? I mean, obviously, yes. The fourth origin story in the MCU (if we allow that neither Thor nor Guardians of the Galaxy is precisely an "origin story") is the most unique, but the beats of the thing are still pretty routine by this point, all the more so if we note that much of what Doctor Strange adds to the Marvel formula is little more than a variation on Batman Begins. Nor is it anything like a graceful or well-built origin story; it makes a hash of its chronology, uses its running time inefficiently, and crucially fails to actually depict the hero who here originates learning much of anything. The idea here is that there's a genius surgeon living in New York, Dr. Stephen Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch), who gets into car crash and suffers extreme nerve damage to his precious, precious hands. His attempt to fix this eventually leaves Western medicine for Eastern spiritualism, taking him to the secret repository of ancient wisdom Kamar-Taj, in Kathmandu. Here, he learns much about the nature of the multi-dimensional universe from a beatific woman known only as the Ancient One (Tilda Swinton), while studying alongside acolyte Mordo (Chiwetel Ejiofor) and librarian Wong (Benedict Wong); the three of them are largely responsible for teaching Strange how to manipulate the energies of one dimension in another, a process indistinguishable from magic.
As is common in these movies, the villain is a dark mirror of the hero: Kaecilius (Mads Mikkelsen), who learned the same wisdom at Kamar-Taj before turning evil and dedicating himself to Dormammu, a powerful being who lives in a dimension outside of time where death itself can be put on hold. As is also common, the villain is not terribly interesting, though Mikkelsen can't help but be compelling and attention-grabbing onscreen. There's also, somewhere in all of it, a woman, Dr. Christine Palmer (Rachel McAdams), who is Strange's ex, and who manages to get the most thankless role for any romantic lead in any Marvel film to date, which is quite the impressive achievement when you consider some of her predecessors.
None of this adds up to much of anything. The characters, in general, get very little to do: considering that his arc involves learning how to manipulate the fabric of the universe with his mind, it's altogether perplexing how very little Strange grows as a character: he starts out as a smug asshole prone to quipping, a clear attempt to clone Tony Stark as Robert Downey, Jr. grows too expensive for Disney to keep shelling out cash every time they want him, and that's very close to where he ends up. In some general sense, he's a touch more humble, but that's not borne out in the dialogue nor in Cumberbatch's limited performance. No other character even really has the chance to be interesting: the Ancient One and Mordo both learn things, but her arc occurs above Strange's head & thus ours, while Mordo's is being saved for the next movie. It helps that Swinton and Ejiofor are both among our most reliably fascinating actors, but even they can only do so much to flesh out material that's not there. As for the plot, it's a slurry of exposition and philosophy that ends up leaving just barely enough room for the most abject, obvious kind of "the stakes are the entire world, now go save everything by interacting with a green screen for five minutes" scriptwriting that dominates these kinds of movie.
But then, we get back to style, and honestly, the whole thing really does work on some primordial level. Director Scott Derrickson, reigned in from all his bad habits by producer Kevin Feige and the other executive, manages to slide in just a little bit of the horror imagery that has mostly made up his career, and it adds a nice level of gravity that gives Doctor Strange admirable weight (this is squandered by the wholly inapt joking tone, but think how much more trivial without the flickers of terror on the margins!). Even when it's not playing with horror movie visuals, the film still has an overall sense of underlit gloom, courtesy of cinematographer Ben Davis, that gives it a nice personality, albeit a fairly generic one. Take out the jokes, and the film gets tone right almost 100% of the time, whatever else happens. It even has the first actively strong score in Marvel movie history, with Michael Giacchino crafting a series of bright musical themes that accentuate the fantastic elements in the film with an adventurous, swashbuckling note.
It is, in short, a pleasant film to watch. Even very pleasant, when the setpieces are kicking in, which they do with some regularity. It's not a tremendously rewarding piece of storytelling, and I have my suspicions that it will prove to be unmemorable even by the standards of Marvel's overly machined popcorn movies. But it's damn cool, and that's no little thing for a grand-scale action adventure romp.
6/10
That's a good thing, because the effects in Doctor Strange are kind of all it has. The story is pedestrian, the characters one-note, the central conflict fuzzy, and comic relief is easily the worst to have show up in the Marvel Cinematic Universe since its inauguration. But the spectacle! It's not quite the Doctor Strange movie of my dreams as a fan of the comic book character - too much grey in the color palette and not enough over-the-top weirdness. Though its two major weird sequences are its very best moments, especially the first, a perhaps inadvertent (but I doubt it) homage to the "beyond the infinite" sequence in 2001: A Space Odyssey that's the most off-kilter and thus delightful moment in any MCU film since the 2011 Captain America: The First Avenger found room for a campy musical number. The point, though, is that even if this is a bit drab in the color palette, the film's visuals are still beyond amazing in their own right. Any fear that this would just be Marvel's Inception can be put to rest: while involving many of the same concepts (rooms spinning and fragmenting, cities folding in on themselves), Doctor Strange brings new stuff to the table - all of the spatial warping is based on the mirror principles of a kaleidoscope, which sounds like a little thing until you're watching it - and also does the same stuff much better (as six years of evolving technology will do for you).
So with all that in mind, does the rest of it actually matter? I mean, obviously, yes. The fourth origin story in the MCU (if we allow that neither Thor nor Guardians of the Galaxy is precisely an "origin story") is the most unique, but the beats of the thing are still pretty routine by this point, all the more so if we note that much of what Doctor Strange adds to the Marvel formula is little more than a variation on Batman Begins. Nor is it anything like a graceful or well-built origin story; it makes a hash of its chronology, uses its running time inefficiently, and crucially fails to actually depict the hero who here originates learning much of anything. The idea here is that there's a genius surgeon living in New York, Dr. Stephen Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch), who gets into car crash and suffers extreme nerve damage to his precious, precious hands. His attempt to fix this eventually leaves Western medicine for Eastern spiritualism, taking him to the secret repository of ancient wisdom Kamar-Taj, in Kathmandu. Here, he learns much about the nature of the multi-dimensional universe from a beatific woman known only as the Ancient One (Tilda Swinton), while studying alongside acolyte Mordo (Chiwetel Ejiofor) and librarian Wong (Benedict Wong); the three of them are largely responsible for teaching Strange how to manipulate the energies of one dimension in another, a process indistinguishable from magic.
As is common in these movies, the villain is a dark mirror of the hero: Kaecilius (Mads Mikkelsen), who learned the same wisdom at Kamar-Taj before turning evil and dedicating himself to Dormammu, a powerful being who lives in a dimension outside of time where death itself can be put on hold. As is also common, the villain is not terribly interesting, though Mikkelsen can't help but be compelling and attention-grabbing onscreen. There's also, somewhere in all of it, a woman, Dr. Christine Palmer (Rachel McAdams), who is Strange's ex, and who manages to get the most thankless role for any romantic lead in any Marvel film to date, which is quite the impressive achievement when you consider some of her predecessors.
None of this adds up to much of anything. The characters, in general, get very little to do: considering that his arc involves learning how to manipulate the fabric of the universe with his mind, it's altogether perplexing how very little Strange grows as a character: he starts out as a smug asshole prone to quipping, a clear attempt to clone Tony Stark as Robert Downey, Jr. grows too expensive for Disney to keep shelling out cash every time they want him, and that's very close to where he ends up. In some general sense, he's a touch more humble, but that's not borne out in the dialogue nor in Cumberbatch's limited performance. No other character even really has the chance to be interesting: the Ancient One and Mordo both learn things, but her arc occurs above Strange's head & thus ours, while Mordo's is being saved for the next movie. It helps that Swinton and Ejiofor are both among our most reliably fascinating actors, but even they can only do so much to flesh out material that's not there. As for the plot, it's a slurry of exposition and philosophy that ends up leaving just barely enough room for the most abject, obvious kind of "the stakes are the entire world, now go save everything by interacting with a green screen for five minutes" scriptwriting that dominates these kinds of movie.
But then, we get back to style, and honestly, the whole thing really does work on some primordial level. Director Scott Derrickson, reigned in from all his bad habits by producer Kevin Feige and the other executive, manages to slide in just a little bit of the horror imagery that has mostly made up his career, and it adds a nice level of gravity that gives Doctor Strange admirable weight (this is squandered by the wholly inapt joking tone, but think how much more trivial without the flickers of terror on the margins!). Even when it's not playing with horror movie visuals, the film still has an overall sense of underlit gloom, courtesy of cinematographer Ben Davis, that gives it a nice personality, albeit a fairly generic one. Take out the jokes, and the film gets tone right almost 100% of the time, whatever else happens. It even has the first actively strong score in Marvel movie history, with Michael Giacchino crafting a series of bright musical themes that accentuate the fantastic elements in the film with an adventurous, swashbuckling note.
It is, in short, a pleasant film to watch. Even very pleasant, when the setpieces are kicking in, which they do with some regularity. It's not a tremendously rewarding piece of storytelling, and I have my suspicions that it will prove to be unmemorable even by the standards of Marvel's overly machined popcorn movies. But it's damn cool, and that's no little thing for a grand-scale action adventure romp.
6/10
16 comments:
Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.
Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.
6 major superhero movies and 5 of them 6's? Are you able to rank them or do they just blend in to one another?
ReplyDeleteExpect the MCU quality to jump up soon. Marvel have been using a new method to get directors where they tell targeted directors what they want and the directors pitch it back to them. So far Waititi and Coogler have been recruited using this. So its looking good.
Haven't watched this movie, never will, but lol @ the people who think that the MCU has motivation to vary their products
ReplyDeleteJ.S.- Probably this:
ReplyDelete-Doctor Strange
-Batman v Superman
-Deadpool
-X-Men: Apocalypse (which I'd switch to a negative 6 rather than a positive one)
-Suicide Squad (which I'd bump down to a 5)
But I think that if I ever re-watch Deadpool, my opinion of it will go down considerably
Andrew- I can see the reason for hope with both Black Panther and Raganarok, though I'm a lot less excited for the latter after seeing Doctor Strange. This one actually came in above my expectations, so weirdly, I'm feeling more favorably inclined to the franchise, however minutely, than I did at this time yesterday.
The stakes of the world were indeed in the balance, but I did love the inversion on the typical Marvel movie finale, in which SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER we instead watch a city get un-destroyed.
ReplyDeleteAs much as I love Michael Giacchino, I can't agree on the score for the film. Every element about it that could catch my ear was specifically because it sounded derivative of something I couldn't put my finger on (except for a jarring moment in the climax where suddenly the movie was made up of a beautiful choir Enya-esque motif that just came out of nowhere). Even if RedLetterMedia didn't confirm my suspicions by calling it out as Giacchino's score to Star Trek, that utter familiarity would have still bothered me enough to hold it against the film.
ReplyDeleteEven my girlfriend was talking about how obvious it was not an original work.
I came out of this one not hating it, but definitely more coolly disposed towards it than most entries in the MCU, and I wasn't initially sure why. Certainly its narrative arc is basically coherent and intact, which in a superhero movie in 2016 is a privilege not to be taken for grated, and the effects are definitely spectacular, to say nothing of them being deployed in service of some really conceptually clever sequences. And of course, I'm pathologically incapable of disliking any movie in which Scott Adkins gets to do a Guyver kick.
ReplyDeleteOn reflection, I think what irks me is the film's form and content being at odds with one another. It wouldn't bother me so much that it's just another recitation of the MCU's standard "white male dickhead learns to be less of a dickhead by means of stopping an ambiguous purple particle effect from ending the world," if it wasn't for the fact that the film explicitly positions itself as being the surreal, trippy, psychedelic entry in Marvel canon. The crux of Strange's whole journey is his dawning appreciation of a universe much bigger and weirder and fuller of possibility than anything he's ever imagined before, even as the story around him is retrenching into the most rote and formulaic shape (the schema of the plot maps so closely to that of Ant-Man it's disheartening). Superficial "weirdness" like the DMT halucination sequence allows us to understand Strange's character arc in narrative terms, but we can't share in his sense of illumination when the plot beats are all so familiar.
Also, I'd be interested to learn from anyone who knows the comics better than me whether the mirror dimension is a concept that originates in the source material, because otherwise it stuck out to me as a weirdly specific copy of the idea of the spiritual barriers from the obscure old manga X 1999.
"There's two things in this world I love, my car and my beautiful han-Oh, shit!"
ReplyDeleteAs someone who isn't and will never get tired of Marvel movies, I enjoyed this quite a bit. That means when the sequel is more of the same instead of the interdimensional odyssey I want, I'll still enjoy it. But here's hoping this was the introductory movie.
The visuals were indeed great. I was hoping Dread Dormammu would show up, and he didn't disappoint. All ripply and shit. But scenes were under-lit, so I'm glad I saw it in 2-D despite promises of 3-D awesomeness.
And I know Disney owns Marvel, so I understand the magic carpet, but what the hell are sling rings? Were they actually from the comics? They seemed pointless. And why do people know Loki's alive?
P.S. I think you need to update your comment system. The spell-checker doesn't recognize ripply or Dormammu.
Man, when Norco and Kacellious got things to do, the actors were so dialed in. Too bad that made up like three minutes of screen time.
ReplyDeleteI like the Marvel house style, I like the little variations in it, I liked this movie. But there's no wheel reinvention here.
For me:
Civil War
Deadpool
Dr. Strange
X-Men
Suicide Squad
BvS
The mirror dimension and Sling Rings are indeed exclusive to the MCU which means they'll bleed into the comics sooner or later, like Spider-Man's organic webbing.
ReplyDeleteAnd Loki is known to be alive because the scene in which he is mentioned is actually a scene from Thor Ragnarock. I presume he is discovered then.
I didn't know Spidey got organic web-slingers in the comics. I never even thought about the MCU influencing the comics. Please tell me Agents of SHIELD characters aren't sucking in two media.
ReplyDeleteWho says Agents of SHIELD sucks? Only people who gave up half way through Season 1. Its much better now. It use the TV medium to make an ensemble piece like the Xmen show Fox will never make.
ReplyDeleteOnly Coulson and May have made it from the show to the comic. The biggest impact is on characters from the comics who made it to Agents of SHIELD and their becoming more like TV (Mockingbird and Quake being the biggest recipients).
I watched the first two seasons of SHIELD. I either hated or was indifferent to all the characters except Daisy's dad, and when indifference eventually won over, I moved on. I would say they should've killed off half the characters and focused on developing just a few, but then I remember they already did their best trying to develop the genericness that is Daisy.
ReplyDeleteOne thing I'm a little surprised you didn't comment on: The climax. Every single other MCU film--or at least the ones I've seen--have the good guys win in a big battle where they simply overpower the opponent; sure, often they'll use their wits or brains to help them, but they still ultimately have to win via action. I guess maybe not Civil War, but in that case the villain wasn't interested in fighting to begin with.
ReplyDeleteHere, though... that isn't the case. Yes, there's of course a big action set piece towards the end, but it's ultimately just to set up the actual climax, which isn't decided through action at all. I won't say more for fear of spoiling people who haven't seen the film, but it's one of the most ingenious ways I've seen to defeat a villain. That really propped the film up for me. Otherwise it felt fairly routine, but that climax made it stand out.
Did you ever get to watching the Extended Edition of Batman v. Superman btw? I don't think I have three hours to watch something I wasn't hugely enthusiastic for in 2 and a half.
ReplyDelete@moviemotorbreath: As much as it pains me to say it, I can't imagine that if one didn't at least like the shorter version of BvS, they'd be really impressed by the longer one. It fills in some plot holes, but everything everyone (else) hated--the overwrought grimdarkness of the tone, the momentum-crushing and barely-explicable DC easter eggs, the jars of piss, the Jesse Eisenberg Science Joker--is obviously still right there. Except now, you know, there's slightly more of it.
ReplyDeleteThis is coming from someone who thinks it's the second best movie they've seen this year, too (and that's out of something like 44 feature length films. (Yeah, I'm kind of a Snyder booster. But if it helps my reputation in any way whatsoever, I think Sucker Punch is an unbelievable piece of crap.)
Anyway, my guess is Tim will get around to BvS:DOJ:UE (ugh) at some point between the swallowing of the Earth of the sun and the heat death of the universe...
I needed some fun, light escapism in light of recent political developments, and that was what I got. I liked it A LOT more than Civil War, I'll tell you that much. The special effects were indeed HELLA COOL.
ReplyDeleteHere's one thing that bugged me (spoilers): after Strange kills the first baddie, he's all, oh no, I killed a guy! and the other dude's like, sometimes that's what you have to do, and he's like, not if you're imaginative enough! And...then he ends up (indirectly) murdering the shit out of all the baddies anyway. I really thought, briefly, that it would just end with them losing their powers and having to learn humility as regular humans, but I guess that's not the Marvel Way. It DID seem like a gratuitously sadistic denouement.