28 February 2011
OSCAR THOUGHTS, or: WHO DOES ROGER DEAKINS NEED TO BLOW TO WIN A MOTHERFUCKING ACADEMY AWARD?
The 83rd Academy Awards have been and gone. I went a subpar 15/24 on my predictions, largely because I tried to be too clever (I should absolutely have been able to pick up another 3 without trying). But that's in the past.
(Though I'm trying to figure out, now, how to reconfigure my rule for picking Animated Short. It seems that I should have been able to nail "The Lost Thing" through my "least-favorite always wins" rationale, even if it wasn't my least-favorite... "the most boring one wins", perhaps? That fits the data, too).
The awards themselves went, as usual, to people and films that only vaguely deserve them; it's simply not worth getting worked up over. Though I will say that, annoying as it is that Tom Hooper won, it's not like he's some hackwit yokel, the way the internet would seem to have it. He directed John Adams, for chrissakes, and if that doesn't win him at least some measure of respect, then I don't know.
Firth, Bale, Leo, all winning for less than their best work... it happens (Portman, I think, did win for her best work, which was still less than Bening at about 75%). Same for Randy Newman winning for one of the worst songs he's ever written - I say this as a massive fan of Randy Newman's 1970s output, and even of much of his Pixar work - but it was a particularly awful Best Song slate. I am heartbroken that Ugly Alice picked up two Oscars, but not massively surprised, though it's a little bit hard to explain how The King's Speech could pick up Best Director and none of its craft nominations.
And then there's Best Cinematography. In which Wally Pfister, a very good DP, who did a very good job shooting Inception, managed to turn Roger Deakins from 0-for-8 loser into a 0-for-9 loser. It's like 2007, only even worse: though both of Deakins's films that year were better-shot than True Grit, at least Robert Elswit was at his career peak that year, too. Whereas this was maybe my least favorite of Pfister's four nominations. When Emmanuel Lubezki loses next year for The Tree of Life (which he will), I'll officially give up on this category, but for now I've only given up on seeing Deakins ever win. Unless he does so next year, beating Lubezki, because that would be fucking perfect.
As for the ceremony itself: what a dismal sack of crap. Anne Hathaway wasn't a half-bad host, though you could see the effort to pretend that things were working at times; James Franco checked out by the time the pre-recorded (and I thought, tremendously unamusing) opening montage of a journey through the BP nominees was done. The highlight for me was undoubtedly Kirk Douglas being all sassy and coy and proving that a debilitating stroke doesn't have to ruin your comic timing. The low point is harder to pinpoint: the holographic Bob Hope and the subsequent less-than-convincing Bob Hope impersonator made me faintly ill, Steven Spielberg's little "sometimes the losers become even more classic than the winners!" bit was incredibly tacky, and the Magical Movie Kaleidoscope background never worked, though I think the concept is sound.
Speeches: Melissa Leo managed to combine my favorite moment in any acceptance speech - she said "fuck" at the Oscars! - with my least favorite - the rest of her wandering, aimless, yammering. I adored that Randy Newman's speech was basically just him being irritated at God knows what. Lee Unkrich's speech for Animated Feature was sweet and all, but I couldn't stop staring at his eyes, wondering when the last time he got any sleep was. I don't know what Pfister's speech was like, because I was too busy sputtering and sending outraged text messages. Colin Firth and Tom Hooper had, beyond question, the classiest speeches; maybe that's why the Academy gives so many awards to Brits.
At least it was short. Here's to next year! when the hosts will be better and the direction more fluid and the montages hopefully still gone, and the winners more deserving. Or, y'know, none of those things, but a fella can daydream.
(Though I'm trying to figure out, now, how to reconfigure my rule for picking Animated Short. It seems that I should have been able to nail "The Lost Thing" through my "least-favorite always wins" rationale, even if it wasn't my least-favorite... "the most boring one wins", perhaps? That fits the data, too).
The awards themselves went, as usual, to people and films that only vaguely deserve them; it's simply not worth getting worked up over. Though I will say that, annoying as it is that Tom Hooper won, it's not like he's some hackwit yokel, the way the internet would seem to have it. He directed John Adams, for chrissakes, and if that doesn't win him at least some measure of respect, then I don't know.
Firth, Bale, Leo, all winning for less than their best work... it happens (Portman, I think, did win for her best work, which was still less than Bening at about 75%). Same for Randy Newman winning for one of the worst songs he's ever written - I say this as a massive fan of Randy Newman's 1970s output, and even of much of his Pixar work - but it was a particularly awful Best Song slate. I am heartbroken that Ugly Alice picked up two Oscars, but not massively surprised, though it's a little bit hard to explain how The King's Speech could pick up Best Director and none of its craft nominations.
And then there's Best Cinematography. In which Wally Pfister, a very good DP, who did a very good job shooting Inception, managed to turn Roger Deakins from 0-for-8 loser into a 0-for-9 loser. It's like 2007, only even worse: though both of Deakins's films that year were better-shot than True Grit, at least Robert Elswit was at his career peak that year, too. Whereas this was maybe my least favorite of Pfister's four nominations. When Emmanuel Lubezki loses next year for The Tree of Life (which he will), I'll officially give up on this category, but for now I've only given up on seeing Deakins ever win. Unless he does so next year, beating Lubezki, because that would be fucking perfect.
As for the ceremony itself: what a dismal sack of crap. Anne Hathaway wasn't a half-bad host, though you could see the effort to pretend that things were working at times; James Franco checked out by the time the pre-recorded (and I thought, tremendously unamusing) opening montage of a journey through the BP nominees was done. The highlight for me was undoubtedly Kirk Douglas being all sassy and coy and proving that a debilitating stroke doesn't have to ruin your comic timing. The low point is harder to pinpoint: the holographic Bob Hope and the subsequent less-than-convincing Bob Hope impersonator made me faintly ill, Steven Spielberg's little "sometimes the losers become even more classic than the winners!" bit was incredibly tacky, and the Magical Movie Kaleidoscope background never worked, though I think the concept is sound.
Speeches: Melissa Leo managed to combine my favorite moment in any acceptance speech - she said "fuck" at the Oscars! - with my least favorite - the rest of her wandering, aimless, yammering. I adored that Randy Newman's speech was basically just him being irritated at God knows what. Lee Unkrich's speech for Animated Feature was sweet and all, but I couldn't stop staring at his eyes, wondering when the last time he got any sleep was. I don't know what Pfister's speech was like, because I was too busy sputtering and sending outraged text messages. Colin Firth and Tom Hooper had, beyond question, the classiest speeches; maybe that's why the Academy gives so many awards to Brits.
At least it was short. Here's to next year! when the hosts will be better and the direction more fluid and the montages hopefully still gone, and the winners more deserving. Or, y'know, none of those things, but a fella can daydream.
8 comments:
Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.
Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.
Chacun son sack of crap, but Hooper is classy? "Triangle of man-love, Colin, Geoffrey, and me - sorry, Helena." And no mention of Harvey, who's nobody's teddy bear, but while we're on the subject of how you came to be up on this stage, Tom.....
ReplyDeleteIn my own reflection, I hypothesized that Newman's win was either the Academy feeling sorry for him or they wanted to atone for not giving the award to "You've Got a Friend in Me" or "When She Loved Me." If they were just feeling sorry for him, then they should have voted for "Almost There" last year. I admit I say that without having seen "Crazy Heart," but until I do, that's what I think.
ReplyDeletehttp://movies-nowandthen.blogspot.com/2011/02/oscars-2011.html
It's interesting hearing that the Spielberg bit was taken as very tacky. In the room I was in it was generally universally liked, and I liked it a lot too... but then I've had a chip on my shoulder all week about the Oscars. The idea that taste and quality, especially in art, can have a perfect formula that applies to every person's perspective has always been something I've had a problem with, and a lot of opinions about who should and shouldn't win tend to get a little... vicious. I myself am no stranger to that, of course.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, the whole buildup is always with such a focus on who the winners will be and going for that gold, that I think ending on a note that reminded us that the losers also follow in a tradition of great movies was classy, not tacky, and emphasized the brotherhood of the art that I try to keep myself involved in. I can certainly see how it would be interpreted in a more snide way, of course, but my perception was the above...
I've given up on expecting other than entertainment via bile fascination from the Oscars, but since that's my favorite kind of entertainment, I always look forward to them.
ReplyDeleteRegarding James Franco's having checked out, possibly with the assistance of a lady named Mary Jane, I refer readers here: http://twitter.com/#!/BrianLynch/status/42081898310287360
I actually tried (keyword) to watch it, got about 10 minutes in, thought Fuck-It-This-Is-Boring-The-Hosts-Are-Terrible and rather threw on some UFC 127. Can't say I was disappointed.
ReplyDeleteWe debated whether James Franco bombed or WAS bombed. As for the winners, no surprises except Hooper, and I agree True Grit was the best in the Cinematography category. We should thank the Academy that it didn't give True Grit one more nomination, otherwise it would have tied a record 0-11.
ReplyDeleteMaybe Spielberg was right--seeing the 0-11 The Color Purple WAS better than Out of Africa.
No mention of the terrible, terrible fucking autotune joke, Tim? If that didn't demonstrate the pathetic attempts of the ceremony to earn favor with the "youth demographic", I have no idea what else did.
ReplyDeleteAutotune... *shakes head*
ReplyDelete