26 February 2013

MARCH 2013 MOVIE PREVIEW

What a fast February that was. Here we are, with pre-summer blockbuster season just about to kick off, and I feel like I've still got a pile *this high* of new releases I missed.

But anyway, yes: March, the new home of popcorn season movies that couldn't be fit into summer like decent people do. I always harbor this little hope that it will go back to the way things were as recently as just six or seven years ago, and every year it gets more entrenched. Last year's super-mondo blockbuster The Hunger Games certainly didn't help matters. Of course, we don't have one of those coming along this year, but that's not going to stop them from trying.

1.3.2013

And even if we did have one coming, it would surely not be Jack the Giant Slayer, the year's very first Great Big CGI Epic, and a grittified fairy tale of the most uncommonly idiotic appearance. Bryan Singer is a fine director and all, but it's telling that we're hearing more about his 2014 X-Men film than the movie he as coming out right now, because it looks ugly, stupid, and it has been given the rudest treatment with release dates.

In other wide releases, we get 21 and Over, which is literally being sold as "so, you though The Hangover was too grown-up, eh?" Also something called Phantom, about which I know not a damn thing, and The Last Exorcism Part II, and if you don't know why that's a hilarious title, then I'm afraid there's nothing I can do to help you.

Stoker is not, meanwhile, a wide release, but one of its seven locations does happen to be in my metro area, and that pleases me, because Park Chan-Wook + Nicole Kidman = Yes, please.


8.3.2013

Surely, Oz the Great and Powerful will be better than I think it is, right? Sam Raimi is making it, and he's a talented man. Somebody, please tell me anything that will make me think that this isn't going to be a giant steaming pile of candy-colored dogshit. Or at least that it will be better than Ugly Alice.

Dead Man Down reteams Noomi Rapace with the director of the first Dragon Tattoo, and that's at least nominally exciting, though it probably didn't need to happen with a plot that sounds like it has been in mothballs since 1983.


15.3.2013

Halle Berry is starring in a movie about a 911 dispatcher hunting a serial killer who has a young woman in his trunk. The whole time I saw the trailer, I kept thinking, "this is going to be called Dispatch, and that's absolutely the worst title ever". In fact, it ends up that its title is The Call. The worst is not, so long as we can say, "this is the worst".

But hey, director Brad Anderson made a good movie a decade ago, so that's something.

You know how to tell that I can be really dumb sometimes? I heard tell of a movie starring Steve Carrell and Jim Carrey, and I thought, "well, that could be funny", and I continue to think that even after having seen the dispiritingly broad The Incredible Burt Wonderstone Trailer. Watch me be unreasonably disappointed in just two weeks' time!


22.3.2013

The first thing that I love: we're getting two competing "terrorists attacking the White House" movies in one year. The second thing I love, that Roland Emmerich is the man behind the respectable won. Unless you consider a rushed-into-production Gerard Butler vehicle "respectable", in which case I hope you have Olympus Has Fallen inked onto your calendar. I have to admit, the unapologetic crassness charms me a bit.

The year's first proper animated feature - Escape from Planet Earth being more like a parody of a fever dream - is DreamWorks Animation's The Croods, a caveman adventure that, like most DWA projects, has vaguely disgusting-looking human character designs. But, it is also co-directed by Chris Sanders, who has as good a track record as any animation director this side of Brad Bird, and that alone is enough for me to confidently and enthusiastically anoint this as my most anticipated of the month, by a huge margin.

Tina Fey and Paul Rudd team up for Admission, which is shaping up to be rather unfortunately heartwarming-in-concept for a comedy starring those two people.


29.3.2013

Remember how G.I. Joe: Retaliation was all set for last June, and then they pulled it either because a) the studio wanted more Channing Tatum, b) there wasn't time to finish the 3-D conversion, or c) it was a dog, and Paramount wanted to dump it. The fact that it landed in March, instead of, say, the Fast Five April slot, tells me all I need to know on that front, but I will not try to convince anybody not to be excited for this one if they have somehow managed to find it within them to feel good about it at any point in its development.

The Stephenie Meyer book that doesn't have nonthreatening vampires, The Host, has been turned into a movie, and that is surely not good; it stars Saoirse Ronan, and was adapted by Andrew Niccol, and that's at least potentially good (the question is, is it Gattaca Niccol or S1m0ne Niccol who showed up on set?). I mean, best-case scenario is still not very exciting, but there's a pretty wide range between best- and worst-case here.

Lastly, Tyler Perry has a new melodrama. It's not clear to me at this point if its given name is Tyler Perry's Temptation, or Tyler Perry's Temptation: Confessions of a Marriage Counselor, and damn me, but I am far more excited for the second of those possibilities than the first. Instead of Perry's usual cast of underused, terrifically gifted African-American actresses given a chance to show off, it has Kim Kardashian. I might actually be more excited to see how this turns out than I am for The Croods.

12 comments:

  1. Have you seen Kiastromi's Like Someone In Love yet? It's On Demand, and I'm debating on watching it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Seeing a preview of PHANTOM on Wednesday. Have no idea if it's a vanity project that just happened to get big name actors or something else.

    The fact that the company producing it is normally a distribution company makes me nervous.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Brad Anderson made a very good movie five years ago too, called Transsiberian. Nobody saw it because it opened the same day as The Dark Knight, but it's definitely worth catching.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Is it unreasonable of me to hope that Stoker features a scene of Nicole Kidman beating down a hallway full of goons with a hammer?

    And yes,finally, G.I. Joe Retaliation. The people demanded Tatum and now we get Tatum.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Unknown- Its press screening at the Chicago Film Fest last year lacked English subtitling, so I missed out. Didn't know it was available through On Demand, but for myself, I wish to see it on a proper movie screen.

    Mr. K- Ooh, let us know! I will point out that New Line was a distribution company that turned into a production company, and that turned out mostly well.

    Michael- I did in fact catch up with Transsiberian, and I liked it, though not nearly as much as Session 9 and The Machinist.

    Regardless, I think we can all agree that The Call will not be at the level of any of them.

    KingKubrick- Probably unreasonable, but it would certainly make it my new favorite movie of all time if that happened.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The real question about The Call is whether or not it can become the first ever movie from WWE Films that can be called "fairly good."

    (Well, I really dug See No Evil, but I have an unhealthy love for slasher films and pro wrestling, so I don't count.)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Request: When you review THE LAST EXORCISM II, give it a different title every time you mention it, Dagny Taggart-style.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm on exactly the same wavelength with regards to Oz: The Great and Powerful. I'd like to believe that it's just been spectacularly mis-marketed and Sam Raimi's got a couple of aces hidden up his sleeve. There are moments in the trailer, like the widening aspect ratio, that suggest he's playing on at least a slightly subtler level than empty CGI fakery.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Making easy jokes about how The first Last Exorcism clearly wasn't the last exorcism if there's a Last Exorcism II is just too easy. Of course any Final Fantasy fan won't see anything weird about it.

    I like to think that it's not "the last exorcism ever", but rather "the last exorcism I saw before today", in which case you could just crank those sequels out with no logical problems.

    ReplyDelete
  10. So, PHANTOM was okay. The idea of a thriller set on a Soviet submarine in the late 1960s hasn't been done before, and Ed Harris & William Fitchner do a good job. It is strange to hear everyone performing with American accents, but it doesn't bother me as much as I expected it to. It's the kind of movie I expect to see on FX or TNT in 5 years that I'll tune in for twenty minutes or so, before finding something better.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Might I just say that I can't f'ing wait for Stoker. I'm quite the Park fanboy, and from what I gather his twistedness remains intact. Hopefully this movie will finally make everyone stop referring to him as "the director of Oldboy"... not that that flick was bad, but it's on the lower end of the Park Chan-Wook spectrum IMO.

    ReplyDelete

Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.

Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.