13 October 2014

CHICAGO INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL '14: BLACK COAL, THIN ICE (DIAO YINAN, CHINA)

Screens at CIFF: 10/11 & 10/13 & 10/17
World premiere: 12 February, 2014, Berlin International Film Festival

It might have been filmed in color; it might have been filmed in China; it might have been filmed decades after of the essential cultural context of the post-WWII America; but other than those little things, Black Coal, Thin Ice is one of the most all-around perfect example of a film noir to have come out in years. True, any one of those elements is arguably an automatic disqualification, let alone all three, but with its beautiful but menacing cinematography, its portrayal of urban life as inherently prone to violence and moral decay, and its choice of protagonist is a drunk, slovenly ex-cop, plagued by memories of the case that got away, and given a chance to make things right at great personal cost. The tune is right even if the instruments are funny. And the great overriding theme of all the great films noirs - you are alone, nobody can be trusted, and the world around you is dying - is proudly on display in every beat of the darkly thrilling mystery that the film explores.

The opening is in 1999, when a dismembered body is found in coal-firing plants scattered all across a province; nobody can figure out how such a geographically expansive crime could have been committed, let alone who could have committed it, but cops Zhang Zili (Liao Fan) and Liang Zhijun (Wang Xuebing) doggedly track the killer anyway, and Zhang even thinks he has a solution of sorts. But a random run-in with some desperate thugs ends tragically, with Zhang dropping out and spending the next five years turning himself into the most dissolute reprobate he could manage. He only emerges when a series of copycat murders starts up, and he figures out quickly enough that the newly dead bodies share a connection to a dry cleaning proprietor named Wu Zhizhen (Gwei Lun Mei), who happens to be the beautiful, dark-eyed widow of the very same man who ended up distributed in coal bins throughout China. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that she has some secrets that need exploring, and it doesn't take a psychic to figure out that Zhang is going to end up fascinated with the enticing woman of mystery for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with solving a cold case or bringing the mad dismembering coal-obsessed killer to justice.

You could not possibly be generous enough to call any of what happens in Black Coal, Thin Ice original (incidentally, the original Chinese title translates to Daytime Fireworks, which suggests enormously different things relative to the film's content; writer-director Diao Yinan selected the titles for both languages). And while it's tempting to read into it some kind of sociological dissection of life in urban China, that would require us to overlook how much of the film's DNA stretches back to 1940s Los Angeles. But originality and social insight are both devilishly easy to overvalue: the justification for Black Coal, Thin Ice isn't that it's daring and meaningful and unprecedented in its complexity (though it would be nice for the Goldener Bär winner at Berlin to be at least one of those things, maybe), but that it's simply a really great version of a long-reliable stock type.

A really great version. If nothing else (and there's plenty else), it's one of the very best-shot films of 2014 (and if I hadn't just seen Timbuktu at the same film festival, I don't think I'd mess around with this ambivalent "one of the best" nonsense). Dong Jinsong, the cinematographer, has a small career to date, but he's clearly a name to keep looking out for: his work is an astonishing mix of classic noir chiaroscuro and glossy, sickly-glamorous candy-colored neon just absolutely everywhere. And while the film doesn't resort to anything as programmatic as color-coding, it's definitely the case that the colors haven't been chosen arbitrarily: there's a scene in a car where one character is lit in blue and red, another is all green, and the cumulative effect (beyond being spookily unreal) is blissfully, intuitively correct: coolness contrasting with rot. I have no idea what colors signify in Chinese culture, but to my Western eyes, it was a perfect little encapsulation of the warring psychologies in that car, and I loved it as much as I have loved any single piece of cinematic lighting all year.

The addition of expressionistic color to the film noir template is inspired, and probably the single most unique element of Black Coal, Thin Ice: in terms of how it structures its narrative, it is elegantly formulaic without stooping to be predictable. And this is a fine thing, in this genre of all genres; in presenting a fatal, deterministic world, the fact that the script falls into generally predetermined contours ends up strengthening our sense that this is not a world where individual people have much of a chance to do anything to change what's going anyway. Still, watching Diao take his characters through the paces is particularly thrilling. And the way that shots are repeated and slightly altered (sometimes by as simple a thing as seeing the same angle in daytime vs. nighttime) contributes still more to the sense of a ritual being acted out, beyond the characters.

Not everything is so strictly mired in this idea of the city as a shiny colored hell where your fate is already set: the messy, anarchic ending rather pointedly disputes that notion, for one, and so do the handful of scenes of startling violence (there is little action, and none of it graphic, in the film, but what's there is always jarring, even just a scene of a killer throwing body parts off a bridge). In other words, only moments of violence or chaos can upset the merciless order of this world. Not a comforting notion at all; it's not a comforting film, though. It's a diagnosis and exposition of a cruel world that stomps on humans and their humanity, and its visual beauty is also, frequently, unnatural and even a little gross: it is the beauty of a snake or a poisonous flower. It doesn't end with the pointless loss of the most deliberately nihilistic films noirs, and it even seems to warily toy around with the idea that "hope" is a thing that exists, somewhere. But goal #1 is still and always to confront the darkness of people and the society that births them, and no film has done that with more exquisite craftsmanship and captivating narrative tension in a long while.

8/10

6 comments:

  1. I saw this film last night.

    I thought that the first 3rd of the film was a lot better than the last two thirds. Particularly, the way the time-transition was done was pretty brilliant. I was really hoping that the film would totally change tracks at that point - as in, everyone's moved on and that case that seemed so important back then doesn't matter at all anymore. It felt like that was going to happen and that's the film I really wanted to see. A kind of genre-reversal.

    However, I got what you described above. I didn't think the thrills were handled as well as they could have been. Particularly, the scene in which an important character is killed on screen isn't really believable - we've seen what that guy's been through in the past. In the context of that, the carelessness that he displays isn't something I can buy.

    Furthermore, the way that certain pieces of plot information were revealed seemed to me to be extremely undramatic - most of the important details about the true nature of the murder could have been presented in a much sharper way, I think. There was also too much convenient coincidence in the plot.

    For me, this film really shone when purely local elements were on display, however, but even they could have been used to stronger effect. For example, both the ice-rink and the crowded bus could have used more tension if they had been used in the context of something closer to a real chase.

    In the end, what I enjoyed most about this film where my own thoughts about how it could have been 'better'. Definitely an interesting and worthwhile watch.

    ReplyDelete
  2. (sorry for the various embarrassing spelling / grammar mistakes)

    ReplyDelete
  3. WARNING: possible spoilers

    Finally caught up with this one. Watched both cuts.

    There appears to be two different cuts screened for mainland Chinese audiences and international audiences. Certain differences exist between them: in the Chinese cut, the prologue serves as a cold open and the opening credits play over the awesome awesome timeskip shot. It seems shorter in places as well; most prominently, the ferris wheel scene is cut just before...er things get rough.

    Otherwise, the tone between the two are about the same, a slow-boil pitch black film noir about a man trying to redeem himself only to find his victory ring ever so hollow (so Northern Chinese le Carré then.) I much prefer its Chinese title, it seems to give the correct impression of what the movie is going to be like, rather than its English counterpart, which suggests a tense murder thriller.

    The biggest difference however is the way the endings play out. The mainland China version ends with a tone of mellowness and bitterness underneath the whole thing, making the identity of the person who set off the daylight fireworks rather explicit and with sad strings underscoring the scene. It also ends with a rather obvious choice for last shot: basically a static wide shot giving the panorama of the city as the fireworks shoot up into the blue sky.

    The international version is...I don't know. More jokey? Certainly the dance music playing over the end credits seem to make it look as though the audience got trolled, but I'm not really sure what keeping the identity of the fireworks person secret served in this one? (I'd bet you watched this cut.)

    Not sure which of the two cuts the director would have preferred, and little information about this exists on the Internet. Just thought you'd know that there are different versions of the same movie.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ok, so I watched this again today. It seems that I had watched the asian version the first time and today's viewing was of the international cut.

    For whatever reason, I enjoyed this much much more the second time around. It just clicked in every way.

    Its interesting to read my own thoughts about it six months later and how different they are. I honestly don't think the reason for the difference is that I watched the different version. Perhaps my tastes have simply shifted.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I know I was busy in February, but I can't believe I totally missed the info about there being two different cuts of the film till now. It gives me something to track down, though.

    And Fedor, did you first see the film at a festival? Because that happens to me ALL the time: I form an opinion in the heated, fast-paced festival environment, and then a few months later I look back at it, and I'm like, "what the hell? That's not right". I mean, I'm also an infallible critic, as we all know, so nothing I ever write is less than the pure objective truth, but still...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nope, home environment for both viewings.

    ReplyDelete

Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.

Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.