07 April 2015

FURIOUSER AND FURIOUSER

Those of us who love the Fast & Furious franchise for its gonzo refusal to commit to any kind of rational naming convention have a new reason to be happy: the follow-up to the film officially titled Fast & Furious 6, but identified Furious 6 onscreen, has been advertised as Furious 7, but in the movie, we find it called FuriousSeven, complete with the not-at-all incidental lack of a space between the words.

Those of use who love the Fast & Furious franchise for all the other things have reason to be happy as well: it's pretty great. Or at least, it's pretty much exactly the movie it should be, even with all its lumps and missteps. There's nothing in it that can compete with the "dragging the bank vault" scene from Fast Five or the "endless runway" scene from FF6, and it commits one of the worst structural sins that an action movie can: its most enthralling, well-constructed, and original setpiece comes early on, leaving more than half of the runtime devoted to many perfectly fine action sequences that can't help but feel a little anticlimactic. Even the actual climax, in which the whole ensemble drives through the entirety of downtown Los Angeles while being chased by a helicopter and a missile-launching drone. It's got scale, and it's got duration, and it's got a host of individual character beats that are perfectly timed (allowing that in a movie like Furious 7, car tricks and gunplay qualify as "character beats"). But it's missing the, forgive me, the furiousness of that wonderful central sequence that begins by tossing five cars out of an airplane (without CGI!) and proceeds to raise the stakes from there.

The franchise already having transformed from a rather crummy if high-spirited series of racing crime movies into a series of globe-trotting heist picture with the (itself rather crummy) Fast & Furious (the fourth one, from 2009), Furious 7 commits to the shift started in FF6 of turning into, basically, Mission: Impossible with cars (down to a setpiece taking place on a giant skyscraper in the UAE). The basic situation: after Dominic Toretto (Vin Diesel) and his beloved polyglot extended family defeated mercenary terrorist Owen Shaw (Luke Evans, appearing here in a wordless, one-shot cameo), they were all set to retire to quiet lives, with their criminal records having been expunged. But Shaw's older, meaner brother Deckard (Jason Statham) - Deckard Shaw! when was the last time we had an action movie bad guy with such a perfect action movie bad guy name? - comes hunting to get revenge, first sending DSS agent Luke Hobbs (Dwayne Johnson) to the hospital while stealing the files identifying Dom's crew. Then it's off to Tokyo, to kill the unseen Han, and alerting Dom to his presence via a snotty phone call that Dom interprets as a death threat just quickly enough to save himself, his sister Mia O'Conner (Jordana Brewster), and Mia's husband Brian (Paul Walker) from a bomb sent to the Toretto homestead in Los Angeles. Fighting a world-class murder genius like Shaw seems hopeless, until his first head-to-head meeting with Dom is interrupted by the shadowy black ops forces of a smiling older man calling himself Mr. Nobody (Kurt Russell). He comes with a deal: if Dom and crew can help him to steal a stolen surveillance program back from an African druglord named Mose Jakande (Djimon Hounsou), he'll let them use his organisation's resources to find and stop Shaw. And thus begins a trek that leads to Eurasia and Abu Dhabi before rounding back to Los Angeles, while Shaw and Jakande combine forces to stop our plucky heroes.

Of course it's convoluted and stupid; just enough to be playful, I'd say. The Fast & Furious movies have had an enormously weird relationship to tone, with the straight-faced, tongue-in-cheek portrayal of the over-elaborate plots of the last couple of movies being goofy enough to support the outlandish, cartoon action sequences, while the greatly sincere treatment of the characters by the filmmakers and the actors who very clearly believe in these roles with all of their generally limited talent ends up being enough to make us care about the stakes in spite of how utterly loopy and implausible the events are. That's particularly important for Furious 7, which was only around halfway through production when Walker died in an unrelated car accident. The film entirely shifts its last minutes to stop functioning as a narrative and instead act as a big, gooey straight guy tearjerker that lets the cast, the characters, and the audience all say goodbye to Walker, and by God, it works: Diesel has almost nothing but liabilities as an actor, and he's best when he's playing a kind of sluggish, threatening sarcasm, but the quavering in his voice as he delivers his closing monologue is legitimately tender and sad and sweet.

The slowed-down character beats end up devouring quite a lot of the film's much too generous 137-minute running time, and particularly in its first half, Furious 7 seems to be missing the boat on its promise to provide a non-stop explosion of automotive spectacle. Because, sincerity is nice and all, but these aren't the most nuanced dramatic actors in the world, and the plot can veer towards the utterly hokey - everything surrounding Dom's girlfriend Letty (Michelle Rodriguez) and her amnesia groans under the weight of how very much Chris Morgan's screenplay believes in it - and there's only so many ways Diesel can purr the same emphatic statements about the importance of family. So it's a relief when we get things like Russell's splendidly robust supporting turn, giving a vital blast of comic energy (he perfectly delivers the film's best visual joke, a bit of product placement so on-the-nose that it goes ridiculous), or the presentation of the menacingly implacable Shaw (Statham can do this kind of snappish outrage in his sleep, but it's still fun) in terms that suggest a slasher movie killer, appearing and disappearing at will. It leavens the thick, syrupy human drama without actually cheapening it.

Obviously, the draw of these films is the action, vehicular and otherwise, and Furious 7 has plenty of both once it finally discards character beats for momentum, though it suffers a bit from new director James Wan and his four editors, who tend to chop up all the fist fights more than they deserve. There are no points where the action necessarily becomes impossible to follow, but in a scene like the Johnson/Statham fight that mostly kicks things off, it would be gratifying to have a little bit less speed and a little bit more physical context. The car scenes are all immensely well-choreographed, though, and even in the most generic setpieces there are grace notes like Wan's tendency to flip the camera on its head along with the fighters, or the opening of the Diesel/Statham fight near the end, which composer Brian Tyler cheekily scores with a dramatic, operatic chant. If the spacing of the action isn't quite perfect, and the film spends its whole second half failing to match the extraordinary blend of creativity and technical elegance of its central sequence, involving aerial practical effects, wholly invisible CGI, a combination of driving action, gunplay, and fist fights, and the welcome presence of the otherwise under-used Tony Jaa (one of the great martial artists in film today, who deserved better for his American debut); well, that's a lot to live up to. The Abu Dhabi sequence is almost as inventive and cut better, while also feeling more oriented around the characters' personalities than their skills. And the L.A. finale... it's kind of too sprawling, actually, and it's one of the few places in the film where the effects let it down. But it's pace beautifully for something that goes on so long, and it at least gives Johnson, who till then seems to have been largely resigned to a brief cameo plenty of fun, ridiculous scenes to play.

There's no discipline to any of this: the film jerks along, the links between scene don't always make sense, and it includes a weird insertion that does nothing but re-incorporate the franchise's third film, The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift, into continuity, and confirm that its star, Lucas Black, remains charmless. But its messiness feels so off a piece with the larking attitude that the cast exudes - for them, it's clearly a chance to hang out and goof around, and that radiates out of the film. It's the key difference between the noisy addle-minded nonsense of Furious 7 and the nonsense of the Transformers franchise, say; the sense that everybody involved loves what they're doing and is grateful to have the chance, instead of grimly marching through the steps needed to cash a big paycheck. Sincerity cuts all ways, and for all its flying cars, corny situations, and hypertrophic musclemen whaling on each other with wrenches, Furious 7 is never, for a single frame, any less than 100% sincere.

7/10

12 comments:

  1. I haven't seen any of these movies except the first, back when it was in theaters, but I saw this on the strength of its two predecessors' reputations. I had a blast, and was shocked how moved I was by the finale. That overhead tracking shot of the two cars was absolutely perfect.

    There was definite room for improvement, though. The Rock is easily the funniest of the actors, and it was disappointing for him to spend so much of the movie sidelined. I also felt Statham was shortchanged by the shift in focus to the Gods Eye McGuffin, and how he would attack from the margins without ever seeming like an especial threat. Even in the climax he's upstaged, by the frolicking helicopter and Predator drone.

    Still and all, the action was dizzying fun, which is ultimately what counts in a movie like this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tim,

    I have only just discovered your page, and am enjoying to a tremendous degree your reviews. (I have some massive thoughts about All About Eve, but later...)

    Anyway, I couldn't find an e-mail address for you so, question - is there any point on commenting on older reviews? Do you or anyone else see those comments?

    In any event, greatly appreciate and enjoy your writing (from a fellow Tim!)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Benjamin- Dead right about the tracking shot. The last scene, for all its schmaltz and godawful CGI, is so perfect in so many ways. I didn't cry, or even come close to it, but I absolutely see why someone would.

    Aussiesmurf- Welcome! And I cleaned up those extra comments for you.

    Meanwhile, I keep pretty close track of the comments people leave on old reviews (there's a widget on the right side of the blog so that everybody else can do so too). So feel free to say anything you like anywhere! I used to have an e-mail address here, but I'd get about 20 spam messages for every actual e-mail, so I killed it a while back.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I feel like this movie is getting a pass based on the fact that we all feel sorry for Paul Walker's tragic death and the impact that it had on his fellow actors.

    I haven't seen a single review that doesn't highlight the fact that the plot is insulting to say the least and the action scenes, though ambitious, are too convoluted and far from being at least good, and yet, the movie is still hailed as a success. These are the kind of flaws that would never be overlooked in, say, a Transformers or a Liam Neeson movie, and yet no one is holding that against this one. Add to that all the ever present fan service (countless objectified women) and the massive trail of guiltless destruction and death, and at the end of the day the only thing that does separate this from a Transformers movie is, as you said Tim, how fully these actors embrace their movie personas. To me that wasn't enough to redeem this movie.

    But even then, I think that what definitely ruined the movie for me was the last montage. As cold as it may seem, a movie should transcend reality not the other way around.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "to kill the unseen Han Lue"

    Did you miss when he was briefly identified on-screen as "Han Seoul-Oh?"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That sounded meaner than I meant it, I think, I meant it as a legitimate question because I was really hoping to see you comment on it.

      Delete
  6. I legit cried during a Fast and Furious movie

    Wish I could back in time to 2001 and tell myself that

    ReplyDelete

  7. And I know everybody has said this, but I still marvel at the idea of this franchise existing. There’s actually a series that has Vin Diesel, The Rock, Jason Statham, Tony Jaa, and Kurt fuckin’ Russell, and its actually good! Its respected by critics and loved by a very diverse, very large audience! How many franchises even get to the 7th installment? And how of those aren’t based on books or comics? And how many of those franchises can say the 7th one was, if not the best, the biggest, maybe slickest one yet? I mean, they’re still way too damn long and several of the films are quite terrible, but we got at least 3 really solid pieces of blockbuster cinema in a row here, and with the movie on pace to make a BILLLION dollars worldwide, the sky’s the limit. No, screw the sky, Furious8 is going to space brehs. They gotta heist an alien artifact that could destroy the world, a car so fast it leaves everybody standing in the dust. Literally, they turn into dust. Only Dom and the family can save us!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think what I find most amazing about these movies is how they're simultaneously the most progressive and regressive action films in regards to race and gender that I can think of. So on the one hand, the male gaze stuff was cranked up to a ridiculous degree in this film (which I find distracting and utterly idiotic).

    On the other hand, when the name "Ramsey" was first used, my mind defaulted to assuming it was going to be a white guy, so when it turned out to be a black woman I thought "Well duh, of course." These movies are continually pushing to include women and people of color who are equally involved in the action as everyone else. There's really no other action franchise that comes close. Paul Walker was literally the only white guy on the team in the past few movies, which is absolutely remarkable to me.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Stephen- I did miss it, actually. i know the internet likes to insist that's his name, but I figured that was the internet being a dick. So I've backed it off to just Han in the review.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It shows up in the fifth, too (my girlfriend and I watched the whole serious in the lead-up to 7), in much the same way for the same length of time. He's never credited as anything other than "Han," unfortunately.

      Which means that in four straight movies with a character named, or at least with the alias, "Han Seoul-Oh," and one where he is explicitly named such, nobody comments on it at all, which is very frustrating to me.

      Delete
  10. I'll be honest. I hate this movie and was expecting everyone to tear it up instead of the relatively rave reception it got. From the uber-machismo to the stupidity of the action scenes (CARS SKYDIVING!! HOW COOL IS THAT!?) to the melodramatic ending about Paul Walker who deserves far better than this, this film is just bad, very bad. It's no different than the Transformers movies that everyone pans, really.

    ReplyDelete

Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.

Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.