03 December 2015
DECEMBER 2015 MOVIE PREVIEW
Ordinarily, December is the month for stock-taking with all of the prestige pictures. This year it is, well, not. We might say that the month is that movie, and then a couple dozen things that aren't that movie. Of course we care about some of them, and we do not care about some others, and everybody will have their own take on which is which - but everybody is thinking about that movie, even if it's only in a negative, "nothing will cause me to see that or care about it" sense. It is the biggest black hole of the movie season, sucking up all the light of the other movies, like nothing has done since- Christ, I don't even think the hype was was so omnipresent when that other movie came out in the summer of 1999. Anyway.
4.12.2015
Only one wide release, it's the first major English-language film on the Germanic legend of the Krampus, a punishing anti-Santa, titled Krampus. Let me cut to the chase: Michael Dougherty's second feature, almost a decade past Trick 'r Treat, could have been about literally anything and I'd be at least provisionally excited. The fact that it's a horror-comedy about a folkloric beast mostly unknown to English speakers just makes it better; this is, in all honesty, the film I'm most excited about in this last month of the year, excepting that one, since that basically doesn't count.
Some limited releases of note: Youth, the English debut of director Paolo Sorrentino, whose films I have generally found glossy in all the right ways; a new Macbeth by Justin Kurzel, whose Snowtown Murders I just didn't cotton to at all, but I'm going to be open-minded; and then Chi-raq. And what shall we say about that? New Spike Lee features are always nerve-wracking; he's got the worst track record out of all the unassailable great American film directors, but his films are at least never valueless. I do, however, hear tell that he gets Chicago wrong, and that's going to be an enormous stumbling block for me, at least.
11.12.2015
A bad weekend for wide releases, since everything here will have a meager seven days to make money until its legs are sliced off, leaving a cauterised stump to show for it. Which leaves us with In the Heart of the Sea, a Ron Howard picture starring Chris Hemsworth as a 19th Century whaler. Howard films are always a little hard to get super-enthusiastic for, but I am also an easy lay for movies about sailing ships. Also, Howard is so far the only director to get a completely effective performance out of Hemsworth, in the underrated Rush, so I'm chalking this up in the "more excited than I should be" column.
In limited release, there's a film by Adam McKay, the director of the better breed of Will Ferrell movies, about the housing market collapse in the 2000s. It's called The Big Short, and no quantity of good buzz can convince me that I give a fraction of a good God-damn.
18.12.2015
Hell of a birthday present for me: an effects-driven family-oriented franchise whose last three films have been a bit dodgy, but I've spent too much time catching up with them to not check out this latest one. But enough about Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Road Chip.
And we'll not even start on Sisters, which I want with every molecule of my being to be excited for; Tina Fey and Amy Poehler, together in a movie at last! Except that I have a longer memory than that: Baby Mama exists, and it is just awful. Maybe this Fey/Poehler adventure will be an improvement; but it's certainly not something I'm going to get excited for in advance.
So anyway, let's talk about Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Unbelievably bad title, by the way, but this franchise is real good at bad titles. The trailers, of course, are masterpieces - the second one, the "Chewie, we're home" one, is my favorite - but my suspicion is that their masterpiece status is totally irrelevant. This is a series built on iconic frames - surely it's not hard for a filmmaker, especially a filmmaker with the thieving magpie instincts of J.J. Abrams, to come up with six minutes of stirring, iconic Star Wars images. Especially especially with that rich and sad orchestration of old and new John Williams music. I'm not saying the film will be bad - I'm saying that what we've seen so far could easily be cobbled out of an otherwise bad movie. Look at how great the remix versions with the Force Awakens trailer audio and prequel trilogy visuals make those movies look!
Also, Abrams is at 1-for-4 in my books right now, and that's only when I'm feeling generous about Super 8. So...
All of which is my way of saying, I think on the whole that it's likelier for this to turn out to be very mediocre than very good, though "modestly good" is probably the likeliest of all. "Very bad" is off the table - Disney isn't going to let another prequel trilogy happen. So best-case scenario, it's the third-best Star Wars, worst-case scenario, it's the fourth-best. That's a narrow band of possible quality, and hard to get massively excited over.
And yet for all of that, I'm so excited that it's idiotic. I have my tickets for a Chicago Navy Pier IMAX screening - that's the real big one, either the biggest or second-biggest in the Midwest, 70% the size of the Lincoln Square IMAX in New York (the largest in the United States) - on the night of the 18th and all, making a special 4-hour trip in to see it, building an entire weekend out of it. For a movie that I expect will be kind of dodgy. Truly, the draw of nostalgia and marketing is strong. Also Williams music, blasting out of a rig of speakers the size of a five-story building.
You know what I am looking forward to absolutely unabashedly, though? The Rian Johnson Star Wars in 2017. Oh, dear God.
23.12.2015
Now now, we can't let the space movie get us so excited that we forget all about 45 Years, because Andrew Haigh is a miraculous filmmaker and nobody has said anything less than glowing about the two leads.
25.12.2015
Pragmatically, Christmas weekend is really just "Star Wars again, but this time with your family", right? But let's go through the motions: some kind of Will Ferrell thing called Daddy's Home, Will Smith boasting a criminally bad accent in Concussion, a hilariously stupid looking "edgier and more x-treme!" remake of Point Break, and last but oh my God not least, Joy, in which David O. Russell continues to inexplicably force Jennifer Lawrence to play roles for which she's every bit of 20 years too young.
New York and L.A. types get to see The Revenant, the new film by reigning Best Director Oscar winner Alejandro González Iñárritu. I understand that it involves Leonardo DiCaprio having mutually consensual sex with a bear.
Rather more intriguingly, Quentin Tarantino is partying like it's 1959 with the 70mm Ultra Panavision roadshow extended cut version of The Hateful Eight, if you live within manageable driving distance of one of the chosen few theaters. It's the kind of situation where even if you expect to fully despise the movie (I don't but I am very dubious of Tarantino's filmmaking in a post-Sally Menke world), the grandeur and romance of the distribution scheme is the draw in and of itself. The Weinstein Company is being unbelievably shitty about clarifying which theater those will be, but Chicago's Music Box is going to be among them, at least. That's no help to most of you, but it's all I've got. Here's a story that's fun for me and probably less so for everybody else in the world: my primary job right now is to keep track of when tickets go on pre-sale at the Music Box, so I can tell David Bordwell, whom I see at least two or three times every week, so he and his wife/co-author Kristin Thompson can buy tickets. And when I say David Bordwell and Kristin Thompson, I do mean that Bordwell and Thompson, because I picked the literal best place in the world to get my Ph.D. I get to call him "David". I don't think I get to call her "Kristin", because we haven't really formally met. This has nothing actual to do with The Hateful Eight, but I take so few opportunities to brag about the exaggerated turn for the better my life has made since I moved to Madison in August, and I figured this was a good opportunity to do so.
30.12.2015
The year winds up back on just the coasts, with Charlie Kaufman's miserabilist animated feature for adults, Anomalisa. Of course I'm looking forward to it - animation that's not family-oriented is rare and must be nurtured - but Kaufman without the whimsical filter of a Jonze or Gondry is something I'm still very nervous around. So I'm not, like, excited. Pensively enthusiastic, let's say.
4.12.2015
Only one wide release, it's the first major English-language film on the Germanic legend of the Krampus, a punishing anti-Santa, titled Krampus. Let me cut to the chase: Michael Dougherty's second feature, almost a decade past Trick 'r Treat, could have been about literally anything and I'd be at least provisionally excited. The fact that it's a horror-comedy about a folkloric beast mostly unknown to English speakers just makes it better; this is, in all honesty, the film I'm most excited about in this last month of the year, excepting that one, since that basically doesn't count.
Some limited releases of note: Youth, the English debut of director Paolo Sorrentino, whose films I have generally found glossy in all the right ways; a new Macbeth by Justin Kurzel, whose Snowtown Murders I just didn't cotton to at all, but I'm going to be open-minded; and then Chi-raq. And what shall we say about that? New Spike Lee features are always nerve-wracking; he's got the worst track record out of all the unassailable great American film directors, but his films are at least never valueless. I do, however, hear tell that he gets Chicago wrong, and that's going to be an enormous stumbling block for me, at least.
11.12.2015
A bad weekend for wide releases, since everything here will have a meager seven days to make money until its legs are sliced off, leaving a cauterised stump to show for it. Which leaves us with In the Heart of the Sea, a Ron Howard picture starring Chris Hemsworth as a 19th Century whaler. Howard films are always a little hard to get super-enthusiastic for, but I am also an easy lay for movies about sailing ships. Also, Howard is so far the only director to get a completely effective performance out of Hemsworth, in the underrated Rush, so I'm chalking this up in the "more excited than I should be" column.
In limited release, there's a film by Adam McKay, the director of the better breed of Will Ferrell movies, about the housing market collapse in the 2000s. It's called The Big Short, and no quantity of good buzz can convince me that I give a fraction of a good God-damn.
18.12.2015
Hell of a birthday present for me: an effects-driven family-oriented franchise whose last three films have been a bit dodgy, but I've spent too much time catching up with them to not check out this latest one. But enough about Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Road Chip.
And we'll not even start on Sisters, which I want with every molecule of my being to be excited for; Tina Fey and Amy Poehler, together in a movie at last! Except that I have a longer memory than that: Baby Mama exists, and it is just awful. Maybe this Fey/Poehler adventure will be an improvement; but it's certainly not something I'm going to get excited for in advance.
So anyway, let's talk about Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Unbelievably bad title, by the way, but this franchise is real good at bad titles. The trailers, of course, are masterpieces - the second one, the "Chewie, we're home" one, is my favorite - but my suspicion is that their masterpiece status is totally irrelevant. This is a series built on iconic frames - surely it's not hard for a filmmaker, especially a filmmaker with the thieving magpie instincts of J.J. Abrams, to come up with six minutes of stirring, iconic Star Wars images. Especially especially with that rich and sad orchestration of old and new John Williams music. I'm not saying the film will be bad - I'm saying that what we've seen so far could easily be cobbled out of an otherwise bad movie. Look at how great the remix versions with the Force Awakens trailer audio and prequel trilogy visuals make those movies look!
Also, Abrams is at 1-for-4 in my books right now, and that's only when I'm feeling generous about Super 8. So...
All of which is my way of saying, I think on the whole that it's likelier for this to turn out to be very mediocre than very good, though "modestly good" is probably the likeliest of all. "Very bad" is off the table - Disney isn't going to let another prequel trilogy happen. So best-case scenario, it's the third-best Star Wars, worst-case scenario, it's the fourth-best. That's a narrow band of possible quality, and hard to get massively excited over.
And yet for all of that, I'm so excited that it's idiotic. I have my tickets for a Chicago Navy Pier IMAX screening - that's the real big one, either the biggest or second-biggest in the Midwest, 70% the size of the Lincoln Square IMAX in New York (the largest in the United States) - on the night of the 18th and all, making a special 4-hour trip in to see it, building an entire weekend out of it. For a movie that I expect will be kind of dodgy. Truly, the draw of nostalgia and marketing is strong. Also Williams music, blasting out of a rig of speakers the size of a five-story building.
You know what I am looking forward to absolutely unabashedly, though? The Rian Johnson Star Wars in 2017. Oh, dear God.
23.12.2015
Now now, we can't let the space movie get us so excited that we forget all about 45 Years, because Andrew Haigh is a miraculous filmmaker and nobody has said anything less than glowing about the two leads.
25.12.2015
Pragmatically, Christmas weekend is really just "Star Wars again, but this time with your family", right? But let's go through the motions: some kind of Will Ferrell thing called Daddy's Home, Will Smith boasting a criminally bad accent in Concussion, a hilariously stupid looking "edgier and more x-treme!" remake of Point Break, and last but oh my God not least, Joy, in which David O. Russell continues to inexplicably force Jennifer Lawrence to play roles for which she's every bit of 20 years too young.
New York and L.A. types get to see The Revenant, the new film by reigning Best Director Oscar winner Alejandro González Iñárritu. I understand that it involves Leonardo DiCaprio having mutually consensual sex with a bear.
Rather more intriguingly, Quentin Tarantino is partying like it's 1959 with the 70mm Ultra Panavision roadshow extended cut version of The Hateful Eight, if you live within manageable driving distance of one of the chosen few theaters. It's the kind of situation where even if you expect to fully despise the movie (I don't but I am very dubious of Tarantino's filmmaking in a post-Sally Menke world), the grandeur and romance of the distribution scheme is the draw in and of itself. The Weinstein Company is being unbelievably shitty about clarifying which theater those will be, but Chicago's Music Box is going to be among them, at least. That's no help to most of you, but it's all I've got. Here's a story that's fun for me and probably less so for everybody else in the world: my primary job right now is to keep track of when tickets go on pre-sale at the Music Box, so I can tell David Bordwell, whom I see at least two or three times every week, so he and his wife/co-author Kristin Thompson can buy tickets. And when I say David Bordwell and Kristin Thompson, I do mean that Bordwell and Thompson, because I picked the literal best place in the world to get my Ph.D. I get to call him "David". I don't think I get to call her "Kristin", because we haven't really formally met. This has nothing actual to do with The Hateful Eight, but I take so few opportunities to brag about the exaggerated turn for the better my life has made since I moved to Madison in August, and I figured this was a good opportunity to do so.
30.12.2015
The year winds up back on just the coasts, with Charlie Kaufman's miserabilist animated feature for adults, Anomalisa. Of course I'm looking forward to it - animation that's not family-oriented is rare and must be nurtured - but Kaufman without the whimsical filter of a Jonze or Gondry is something I'm still very nervous around. So I'm not, like, excited. Pensively enthusiastic, let's say.
22 comments:
Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.
Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.
Yes to Krampus, even given my normal intolerance of Santa-themed horror movies.
ReplyDeleteAnd I found Youth entertaining and very, very pretty, if nothing else. Though I did feel great tension between my appreciation of the visuals and my ambivalence towards the often heavy-handed dialogue and 'themes' (the same thing happened with Birdman a year ago, though I think I was ultimately more favorable to Birdman).
Speaking of which, I really want to hope Iñárritu's return to the 'long, serious, and punishing' kinds of movies he used to do doesn't blow. I mean, Amores Perros is supposed to be pretty great (I haven't seen it), and Lubezki's always a reason to be hopeful, but Birdman was so, so much better than the likes of Biutiful that I want him to stay far away from straight-up drama right now.
And happy upcoming birthday! Even if that movie isn't all that great, I'm sure watching it kill off those chipmunks movies for good will be a satisfactory present.
I am just as, if not MORE excited, about the new Star Wars as you are. The thing is though, I have actually read spoilers that give a synopsis of the whole movie. Normally, I wouldn't do this, but this is a special case, especially for a marketing campaign that straight up REFUSES to tell us just about anything.
ReplyDeleteNow, I won't say anything specific, if you want the spoilers they are out there. What I WILL say is that its increased my belief in this movie being very good blockbuster cinema tenfold. It has a propulsive quest structure, a real fantasy matinee adventure like the OT, with a satisfying beginning/middle/end and coherent character arcs and motivations that followed throughout the movie. Its packed with incident, action, humor, pathos.
A movie is more than its synopsis of course, and yet I feel they got the best available people for the job. I'm not big on any of JJ's films either, but I think this is gonna be the film his whole career has been building to. I think his reverence for the series, and his new use of film over digital, forced him to clamp down on many of his more irritating tics like all the canted angles for no reason or the excessive lens flare, and he's openly stated drawing influence from Kurosawa's staging, John Ford's confident compositions, and the power of stillness used by Terrence Malick of all people. He's great with actors, even inexperienced children in Super 8, so I got full confidence in the performances. He and Lawrence Kasdan have talked so much about the importance of character, and about making a movie that's ultimately delightful. Even though the film is 130 minutes long, they said the focus was on creating a film with clarity, efficiency, wit, and brevity. This know this can't just be the latest episode in a never-ending franchise, but a real movie with a completely satisfying story, if one that builds on the past and sets up the future.
They've paid a lot of attention to practicality. I know you're all tired of hearing about REAL SETS REAL ACTORS, but the effort is gonna show up in the movie. In that new clip, when Rey/Finn/BB-8 get blasted away from an explosion into the sand, you completely buy into it cuz it looked real. They were real stuntpeople flying away from a real explosion and landing in real sand. It makes your immersion, your believablity so much easier, which is highly important for the kind of escapism this is trying to be.
The film is gonna look amazing, not just because of all those real environments, but also the heavy reliance on the style of Ralph McQuarrie. Every bit of modernization they've done, like the Stormtroopers, feels like a modern update in-line with McQuarrie's work. Its gonna look and FEEL like Star Wars. Dan Mindel is doing the cinematography, on film, and by all accounts of the many trailers it gonna be the most gorgeous Star Wars movie ever.
And when they do use more fancy technology, its with ILM, one of the best in the business and pioneers in digital moviemaking. They're gonna use their movie magic powers to create Maz Kanata, blending her in with the other real creatures, having Oscar winning Lupita N'Yongo on set for the actors to act against(instead of being told "look at that dot, that's General Grievous), and later being coached by Andy Serkis on performance capture(and between Gollum, King Kong, and Ceaser from Planet of the Apes, nobody knows great performance capture than him). ILM are gonna update things like the lightsabers, so they cast a realistic glow on the actors, making it that much more believable.
John Williams is doing the soundtrack, Ben Burtt is doing the sound effects, I mean...they got the two main dudes from The Raid for a certain action sequence and maybe to even help with choreography in general.
I have complete faith in this to be great. This could all very well blow up in my face when I'm watching the actual movie, but my excitement cannot be higher.
2 weeks left til the new Star Wars.
@Jeremy: Wait a minute, Iko Uwais and Yayan Ruhian are doing something for Star Wars? Holy shit, *that* is something. Congratulations, you made me excited for something I was going to see, but had been resolute in not giving a crap about. (Even though I kind of love JJ Abrams--as long as you let me ignore those Star Trek films, anyway, which you shouldn't.)
ReplyDeleteTim, I feel you, buddy. I have tickets to the 7pm showing on Thursday night at IMAX. But I'm way more tolerant of JJ Abrams, and I hate that I've become so excited because you're probably right that The Force Awakens will be mediocre-to-good, but my heart pounds with excitement when I think about hearing that orchestral swell and seeing the title card. I've been swallowed whole by the machine.
ReplyDeletethat Revenant joke slayed me.
ReplyDelete"You know what I am looking forward to absolutely unabashedly, though? The Rian Johnson Star Wars in 2017. Oh, dear God."
ReplyDeleteYou are not alone Tim. If there is a director out there that is more appropriate to direct a Star Wars film, I can't think of one.
I am tickled by the idea of David Bordwell, Kristin Thompson, and Tim Brayton seeing Star Wars and The Hateful Eight together, even though that doesn't seem to be a thing.
ReplyDeleteStill, my excitement for you hasn't waned. My excitement for Star Wars: The Force Awakens was already low so I may as well just say it rised, but I got tickets with my friends to see it at the AutoNation IMAX in Ft. Lauderdale the Monday after its release, though that may just be the second time I watch it since my mother wants to see it the day of to witness the crowds and I still know of theaters here in S. Florida that haven't sold out the film.
Krampus, Big Short, Anomalisa, Joy, H8ful Eight and The Revenant... Lots of stuff to look forward to for me this month.
ReplyDeleteI feel zero hype or excitement for SW, I just don't care. The prequels saw to that. No mas. Plus JJ is kinda shit, all whiz-bang and no substance. Into Darkness was the worst movie I've seen in cinemas in YEARS. I'll wait for the Bluray.
I am also making a four hour drive and making a weekend out of it to see Star Wars on an imax - at the West Edmonton Mall. I won't be joining you in spirit to see Road Chip though. I'm afraid you're on your own for that one.
ReplyDeleteI've heard a lot of people saying "the prequels had cooltrailers too", buti just rewatched the Phantom Menace trailer, and it is so not cool. It tries, and doesn't do a BAD job of making the material look better than it is, but it's not mind-blowing in any way. Maybe that's just hindsight. Then again, you know what I haven't seen any of this time around? Fucking Burger King ads with Old Han ordering a whopper.
Those same episode 7 trailers have left me cold, though I'll probably see the damn thing out of curiosity. They're too concerned with showing off Han and Chewie when they should be telling us much more about the new heroes. I'm going to Hateful Eight partly to spite the cop lobby though I think the Man in the Wilderness remake will be the better western. Saw a Youth trailer last week and the way Caine was being transformed into Tony Servillo was disturbing. Was really hoping the Herzog-Kidman Gertrude Bell biopic might show up somewhere but no such luck. Maybe next year. Glad Krampus is coming out tomorrow because I won't have to see the commercials anymore. Happy Holidays!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you, as long as they don't simply shoehorn in the original players into the new film solely for fan service (such as toddler anakin building C3PO or just happening to include a reference to Boba Fett only to ultimately ignore it) and for claps in the theater. But if they are used in service of the story, it makes perfect sense.
DeleteIt is a fine line to walk - keeping old favs for traditional fans, but not making theit presence pointless - and was something George Lucas was incapable of accomplishing. Of course, he was incapable of doing many things well.
" Here's a story that's fun for me and probably less so for everybody else in the world: my primary job right now is to keep track of when tickets go on pre-sale at the Music Box, so I can tell David Bordwell, whom I see at least two or three times every week, so he and his wife/co-author Kristin Thompson can buy tickets."
ReplyDeleteFuck you, Tim. Everything about your life sucks. I know cool people too!
I feel like a dick, but I literally have no idea who those people are.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I always got the underlying feeling that Tim probably is not a fan of Slavoj Zizek and now that he personally knows David Bordwell, he has an ally in the front. Or maybe that's presumptuous of me.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely off-topic: But what are your feelings on Samurai Jack's return being announced and is there a chance of a write-up about it on TFE (or do you feel you've said all you want on the matter with Tartakovsky piece)?
Are you going to be in Chicago at all over the holiday? You have to make a trivia guest appearance! I also live a mile from the Music Box, so thank you for the H8 heads-up.
ReplyDeleteIn the Heart of the Sea - Howard is much better when he is making action-driven films and not making movies drenched in schmaltz (say Rush vs Cinderella Man or Apollo 13 vs A Beautiful Mind), but I still haven't decided if the CGI whale looks just okay or objectively terrible, which makes or breaks the film for me.
ReplyDeleteI really see no reason for me to be more excited for Star Wars than The Revenant, but I don't think I have as much childhood attachment to SW as most people.
ReplyDelete@Surly: Agreed. This looks more like snappy entertainment Howard than violently mediocre Howard, though I'm with Tim in that it's still pretty hard to get excited for the man.
@Sam Wilson: The cop lobby is what ended up convincing me that I ought to see Hateful 8 in theaters.
Also Tim, knowing that you're a lover of musicals - have you listened to Hamilton yet? It's alarmingly great, modern Broadway isn't supposed to be anywhere near this essential.
ReplyDeleteI know I barely ever make it into the comments these days (grad school is SO BUSY you guys. It is sadness-making), but I couldn't pass up answering the questions that had absolutely nothing to do with movies. It's not like this is the last chance we'll have to talk SW: TFA.
ReplyDeleteBrian (just Brian, not Brian M)-
I'll hand it over to a friend of mine, who noted at one point that, you know how sometimes you say "they wrote the book on Subject X"? Bordwell and Thompson wrote the book on film aesthetic. They're the authors of Film Art: An Introduction, which is the standard textbook for introductory film classes all through the country.
moviemotorbreat- Of course I don't like Zizek. That is, in fact, part of why it made sense that I ended up at Madison. Bordwell and I haven't chatted about that, or really all that much. But our handful of interactions have been wonderful.
Danny- We'll see if we can make something work! I'm definitely go to be around.
Arlo- Hamilton is so, so good. It's a whole show that makes good on the promise of the outstanding opening of In the Heights after the rest of In the Heights couldn't. I think it's been a little over-loved, relatively - it's not as good as Fun Home, which made like one-tenth the cultural impact. But it's such an instant-classic, for sure.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe thought of my favorite film blogger hanging out with David Bordwell gives me a geeky tingling of joy up and down my spine. (Hope that doesn't sound weird.)
ReplyDeleteBordwell's article 'The Art Cinema as a Mode of Film Practice' is one of the most useful essays I've encountered in my film studies.
As for Star Wars, I'll go see it opening week but I'm only moderately hyped. My most eagerly awaited movie this year was Mad Max: Fury Road and boy, did it deliver and then some! The fact that I'm a much bigger fan of the Mad Max-movies than Star Wars is also a factor, but Star Wars is pretty cool nevertheless.
Really great post love this. So guys are to going to saw the revenant movie?if yes, then why not you try this website. They provide the best hollywood movies collection in high definition print at cheap prices. Visit here: Watch Revenant 2015 Online Free
ReplyDelete