18 June 2016
WHEN THE FUTURE HAS PAST WITHOUT EVEN A LAST DESPERATE WARNING
A review requested by Tristan F, with thanks for contributing to the Second Quinquennial Antagony & Ecstasy ACS Fundraiser.
If ever a film fully earned the descriptor "cult movie", the 1982 Rankin/Bass production The Last Unicorn is it. Good for the film, and good for its deeply passionate fans, who tend to describe it as one of the formative experiences of their entire childhood. But it is much too small of a cult. This is one of the most gobsmacking animated features of its generation, with a screenplay that's among the most literate ever written in the English language for what certainly would appear, from all the evidence, to be a "children's movie". I think I shan't quibble over that categorisation, though it's part of that mighty subgenre of family movies so far afield from the usual bright and bubbly comedies and adventures that the viewer who comes to it for the first time as grown-up might be forgiven for wondering if there was such a bookish and solemn child as to end up grasping all the resonances of this most autumnal of fantasy travelogues.
The film comes by its pedigree honestly, in two directions. First, it's adapted by Peter S. Beagle from his own 1968 novel, which I have not read, though my understanding is that it was pitched as serious literary fiction for adults, right in the closing moments of the era when a story about a unicorn and a magician in a pseudo-medieval world could be marked outside of rigid genre formulas. My understanding is also that the translation from one medium to the other leaves very little missing: the book, they say, is more sophisticated and its metafictional elements developed more thoroughly and to greater effect, but at the level of theme, and the simple matter of stuff that happens, it tracks quite closely.
Second, as I said, the film was a Rankin/Bass production. This does not mean that Rankin/Bass made it. At this point in its existence, the company that was best known for its well-loved, kind of shitty stop-motion Christmas specials had linked arms with a Japanese animation studio called Topcraft, which had provided some or all of the animation for several Rankin/Bass TV series and specials during the 1970s, with the eponymous Arthur Rankin, Jr. and Jules Bass directing and designing the films, but with most of the work of turning the designs into movement falling to the Topcraft artists. Eventually Topcraft started making feature-length projects under Rankin/Bass's guidance, beginning with the stellar 1977 television film The Hobbit, which was the partnership's first step into the high fantasy genre. To go along with its stern, epic sense of gravity and purpose, the filmmakers hit upon a bold, beautifully ugly aesthetic that was halfway between medieval European woodcuts and contemporary Japanese anime. It was virtually the same style that they'd use on subsequent fantasy films, culminating in The Last Unicorn, Rankin/Bass's first theatrically-released feature since the 1960s, and their last (technically, an entity called Rankin/Bass Productions contributed to the 1999 animated version of The King and I, with Arthur Rankin even involved, but I am loath to count it). Topcraft itself was not long for this world: by the middle of the 1980s, the company would cease to exist, lasting just long enough to release the 1984 feature Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind, whose director Miyazaki Hayao and producer Takahata Isao were so impressed by the work that Topcraft's best artists were capable of that they hired them as the nucleus for the soon-to-be-formed Studio Ghibli.
That was a long paragraph, so I want to reiterate the important part: The Last Unicorn is the more-or-less immediate predecessor to Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind. That is a god-damned huge thing. It's not as good as Nausicaä, obviously - the list of animated features better than Nausicaä is a short and precious one, nor were Rankin & Bass directors with the enormous generosity and artistic insight of Miyazaki - but it's good enough that the lineage makes absolutely perfect sense.
The Last Unicorn not only adopts The Hobbit's medieval-ish look, it doubles down on it: the opening credits, which are not quite the first thing we see, are a hybrid of that aesthetic with a redrawn selection of images from the medieval "Hunt of the Unicorn" tapestries. It's note-perfect scene-setting, heavy with a sense of aged grandeur that's given boldface by the utterly bittersweet title song keening underneath it, written by Jimmy Webb and performed by the band America in an alternately anguished and defiant mood that's a whole world away from the sunny soft rock of "Sister Golden Hair". It leaves one in an awfully thoughtful and even dour place for an animated fantasy, and the film largely contents itself to reiterate that feeling; but first, we must get through the one part of the movie that I just really don't like at all, in which a unicorn (Mia Farrow), who has just overheard talk that she is the last of her kind, receives a visit from a blue butterfly (Robert Klein), who speaks in a mishmash of lyrics from songs written in the first decade of the 20th Century, while managing to spit out enough hints for the unicorn to learn that the rest of her species has been hunted down by the Red Bull, a spectral creature of great menace and uncertain origin. Just in five minutes, the film has done such impressive work transporting the viewer emotionally and intellectually into a state of wistful reverie, and having this barrage of anachronistic humor threatens to blow it all immediately. And I am sure there is a point to all of this. Anachronism is not unknown to The Last Unicorn. But is wielded spectacularly poorly here, and it takes a lot of will to grind through the exposition on the way to a movie that's worth the grind; though how much more it would worth without it.
Also, as a side note, whoever was animating the unicorn in this sequence gave her way too much unnecessarily busy movement. It's like she's got an itch in her neck and no hands with which to scratch it.
There follows, at any rate, a picaresque. The unicorn goes questing to find the Red Bull, encountering perils along the way - one of the first things that happens to her is to be captured by Mommy Fortuna (Angela Lansbury), a false witch with just enough magic to craft a menagerie of fantastic beasts out of some crummy old animals. One of her assistants is the inept magician Schmendrick (Alan Arkin) - his Yiddish name, by the way, is the kind of out-of-place gag that the film works well with, largely by letting it sink into the background without comment - who helps her escape and travels with her; later on, while camping with a band of dumpy woodland thieves led by Captain Cully (Keenan Wynn), who snarkily comments on the beautiful lie of the Robin Hood legend, the wanderers are joined by Molly Grue (Tammy Grimes), a saddish middle-aged woman. Shortly after that, they encounter the Red Bull itself, and to protect the unicorn, Schmendrick draws upon a totally unsuspected well of magical power to transform her into a human. This event neatly cleaves the film in two.
The first half of The Last Unicorn is very good. The second half is breathtaking. For one thing, the plot suddenly zooms down to a single track, leaving the episodic rhythm of the first half behind. The travelers shortly come upon the castle of King Haggard (Christopher Lee), who lives in the throes of intense depression - capital-D Depression, the sort where you aren't sad because you have run out of the capacity to feel anything with hardly any company but his son Lir (Jeff Bridges) and a talking house cat (Don Messick) who looks and talks like a pirate, but is not otherwise anthropomorphic. Here, they find quite quickly that Haggard is responsible for the unicorns' disappearance, but our unicorn - hiding behind the name Amalthea - is already forgetting herself thanks to this damnable human body, while fending off Lir's romantic advances. Genre tropes through and through, but it's hard to put into words how potent the thoughts explored through those tropes can be. There are few moments in children's cinema - in the rest of cinema, for that matter - which resemble the harrowing despair with which Farrow delivers the line "I can feel this body dying all around me!" as the immortal unicorn finds herself encased in fragile, decaying human flesh. This is fantasy doing something it is uniquely suited for: calling our attention to our shared humanity by refracting it through a prism completely divorced from our own reality. We are all dying bodies, after all, and the world is going to keep moving along while we die, and there will be a world after us. That's an unpleasant truth for escapist art like the movies, and The Last Unicorn builds it into the arc of just about every character other than Lir, even the minor ones like Mommy Fortuna and Captain Cully. The metafictional aspects of the story reinforce this: it is about how we tell stories in order to have something permanent remain of us, or in Haggard's case, how we destroy stories for the pleasure of knowing we were the last person to hear them, and something will be forever lost to the rest of the world. Two characters, at different points in the movie, find comfort in knowing that they will always be remembered by a magical animal - for one it is a moment of obscene triumph, for the other it is hard-earned wisdom.
I think the best iteration of the theme comes from Molly, and Grimes's superlative performance (in a movie lousy with great vocal performances - Lee, Lansbury, Arkin in a wonderfully soft and subdued register, Rene Auberjonois in a delightful turn as an alcoholic skeleton - it's especially impressive not that Grimes isn't just the best in show, but that I don't even have to hesitate in making that claim), when she responds to the sight of seeing the beautiful, holy unicorn - the sole object of luminescent white in a movie full of muddy shades - with actual fury that the unicorn didn't appear to hear when she was a young virgin, waiting instead to humiliate her in her frumpy middle age. Later on, she berates Schmendrick for transforming the unicorn into a human with frenzied despair - both moments speak to the misery of a woman lashing out at the joyful childhood she didn't have and is now denied. Beagle has mentioned that Molly's character owes as much to Grimes as to his writing, which isn't wholly fair - he gave her that wonderful monologue of rage upon seeing the unicorn - but it's certainly the case that the performance enriches the character with a great sense of sadness that becomes contentment at the end of the film, but never threatens actual happiness. For that character alone, The Last Unicorn would be top-level fantasy, for me; the fiercely adult nature of Molly and her inner pain, incongruous but also perfectly placed within a realm of magicians and spirit bulls, is what genre films can wallop you with because you're not looking for them.
That said, The Last Unicorn still works purely as a fantasy travelogue, if that's all you want of it: the film is beset with a deep-set feeling of terrifying weirdness, from the designs (Mommy Fortuna and her tree-trunk hat; the savage, triple-breasted harpy she keeps in a cage; the amorphous, internally-illuminated Red Bull; Haggard's desiccated face; hell, even Molly's wild hair, locked into a medusa-like sprawl, is pretty otherworldly), to the simple concepts themselves. This is a kids' movie in which the hero is almost smothered by the giant breasts of an anthropomorphic lady tree; and in which a skeleton gets roaring drunk on imaginary wine before bellowing "uuuuuuuuuuunicorn" with a wrathfulness that's all the nastier for following a scene of absurdist comedy. It's strange and inexplicable as an adult; I presume it must be scary as all hell to a child, what with the savage death of one character, the monstrous implacability of the Red Bull, the unmotivated cruelty of Haggard. Might as well throw in the gentle sense of loss in the final moments: the people we like get happy endings, but they are very ambivalent, theoretical happy endings at best, and not at all satisfying in the conventional way of kids' fantasy (though if ever there was a period where bittersweet, intentionally unfulfilling endings to fantasy stories was in vogue, it was at the end of the '70s and into the '80s sword-and-sorcery boom). It is a film whose triumphant finale involves an immortal being pleased to discover that she has learned the ability to feel regret - powerful and moving, but it can't help but be disquieting as well. It's all part of the warm melancholy that The Last Unicorn has been plying since that first song, and a perfect ending to a marvelously nuanced adventure.
9/10
If ever a film fully earned the descriptor "cult movie", the 1982 Rankin/Bass production The Last Unicorn is it. Good for the film, and good for its deeply passionate fans, who tend to describe it as one of the formative experiences of their entire childhood. But it is much too small of a cult. This is one of the most gobsmacking animated features of its generation, with a screenplay that's among the most literate ever written in the English language for what certainly would appear, from all the evidence, to be a "children's movie". I think I shan't quibble over that categorisation, though it's part of that mighty subgenre of family movies so far afield from the usual bright and bubbly comedies and adventures that the viewer who comes to it for the first time as grown-up might be forgiven for wondering if there was such a bookish and solemn child as to end up grasping all the resonances of this most autumnal of fantasy travelogues.
The film comes by its pedigree honestly, in two directions. First, it's adapted by Peter S. Beagle from his own 1968 novel, which I have not read, though my understanding is that it was pitched as serious literary fiction for adults, right in the closing moments of the era when a story about a unicorn and a magician in a pseudo-medieval world could be marked outside of rigid genre formulas. My understanding is also that the translation from one medium to the other leaves very little missing: the book, they say, is more sophisticated and its metafictional elements developed more thoroughly and to greater effect, but at the level of theme, and the simple matter of stuff that happens, it tracks quite closely.
Second, as I said, the film was a Rankin/Bass production. This does not mean that Rankin/Bass made it. At this point in its existence, the company that was best known for its well-loved, kind of shitty stop-motion Christmas specials had linked arms with a Japanese animation studio called Topcraft, which had provided some or all of the animation for several Rankin/Bass TV series and specials during the 1970s, with the eponymous Arthur Rankin, Jr. and Jules Bass directing and designing the films, but with most of the work of turning the designs into movement falling to the Topcraft artists. Eventually Topcraft started making feature-length projects under Rankin/Bass's guidance, beginning with the stellar 1977 television film The Hobbit, which was the partnership's first step into the high fantasy genre. To go along with its stern, epic sense of gravity and purpose, the filmmakers hit upon a bold, beautifully ugly aesthetic that was halfway between medieval European woodcuts and contemporary Japanese anime. It was virtually the same style that they'd use on subsequent fantasy films, culminating in The Last Unicorn, Rankin/Bass's first theatrically-released feature since the 1960s, and their last (technically, an entity called Rankin/Bass Productions contributed to the 1999 animated version of The King and I, with Arthur Rankin even involved, but I am loath to count it). Topcraft itself was not long for this world: by the middle of the 1980s, the company would cease to exist, lasting just long enough to release the 1984 feature Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind, whose director Miyazaki Hayao and producer Takahata Isao were so impressed by the work that Topcraft's best artists were capable of that they hired them as the nucleus for the soon-to-be-formed Studio Ghibli.
That was a long paragraph, so I want to reiterate the important part: The Last Unicorn is the more-or-less immediate predecessor to Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind. That is a god-damned huge thing. It's not as good as Nausicaä, obviously - the list of animated features better than Nausicaä is a short and precious one, nor were Rankin & Bass directors with the enormous generosity and artistic insight of Miyazaki - but it's good enough that the lineage makes absolutely perfect sense.
The Last Unicorn not only adopts The Hobbit's medieval-ish look, it doubles down on it: the opening credits, which are not quite the first thing we see, are a hybrid of that aesthetic with a redrawn selection of images from the medieval "Hunt of the Unicorn" tapestries. It's note-perfect scene-setting, heavy with a sense of aged grandeur that's given boldface by the utterly bittersweet title song keening underneath it, written by Jimmy Webb and performed by the band America in an alternately anguished and defiant mood that's a whole world away from the sunny soft rock of "Sister Golden Hair". It leaves one in an awfully thoughtful and even dour place for an animated fantasy, and the film largely contents itself to reiterate that feeling; but first, we must get through the one part of the movie that I just really don't like at all, in which a unicorn (Mia Farrow), who has just overheard talk that she is the last of her kind, receives a visit from a blue butterfly (Robert Klein), who speaks in a mishmash of lyrics from songs written in the first decade of the 20th Century, while managing to spit out enough hints for the unicorn to learn that the rest of her species has been hunted down by the Red Bull, a spectral creature of great menace and uncertain origin. Just in five minutes, the film has done such impressive work transporting the viewer emotionally and intellectually into a state of wistful reverie, and having this barrage of anachronistic humor threatens to blow it all immediately. And I am sure there is a point to all of this. Anachronism is not unknown to The Last Unicorn. But is wielded spectacularly poorly here, and it takes a lot of will to grind through the exposition on the way to a movie that's worth the grind; though how much more it would worth without it.
Also, as a side note, whoever was animating the unicorn in this sequence gave her way too much unnecessarily busy movement. It's like she's got an itch in her neck and no hands with which to scratch it.
There follows, at any rate, a picaresque. The unicorn goes questing to find the Red Bull, encountering perils along the way - one of the first things that happens to her is to be captured by Mommy Fortuna (Angela Lansbury), a false witch with just enough magic to craft a menagerie of fantastic beasts out of some crummy old animals. One of her assistants is the inept magician Schmendrick (Alan Arkin) - his Yiddish name, by the way, is the kind of out-of-place gag that the film works well with, largely by letting it sink into the background without comment - who helps her escape and travels with her; later on, while camping with a band of dumpy woodland thieves led by Captain Cully (Keenan Wynn), who snarkily comments on the beautiful lie of the Robin Hood legend, the wanderers are joined by Molly Grue (Tammy Grimes), a saddish middle-aged woman. Shortly after that, they encounter the Red Bull itself, and to protect the unicorn, Schmendrick draws upon a totally unsuspected well of magical power to transform her into a human. This event neatly cleaves the film in two.
The first half of The Last Unicorn is very good. The second half is breathtaking. For one thing, the plot suddenly zooms down to a single track, leaving the episodic rhythm of the first half behind. The travelers shortly come upon the castle of King Haggard (Christopher Lee), who lives in the throes of intense depression - capital-D Depression, the sort where you aren't sad because you have run out of the capacity to feel anything with hardly any company but his son Lir (Jeff Bridges) and a talking house cat (Don Messick) who looks and talks like a pirate, but is not otherwise anthropomorphic. Here, they find quite quickly that Haggard is responsible for the unicorns' disappearance, but our unicorn - hiding behind the name Amalthea - is already forgetting herself thanks to this damnable human body, while fending off Lir's romantic advances. Genre tropes through and through, but it's hard to put into words how potent the thoughts explored through those tropes can be. There are few moments in children's cinema - in the rest of cinema, for that matter - which resemble the harrowing despair with which Farrow delivers the line "I can feel this body dying all around me!" as the immortal unicorn finds herself encased in fragile, decaying human flesh. This is fantasy doing something it is uniquely suited for: calling our attention to our shared humanity by refracting it through a prism completely divorced from our own reality. We are all dying bodies, after all, and the world is going to keep moving along while we die, and there will be a world after us. That's an unpleasant truth for escapist art like the movies, and The Last Unicorn builds it into the arc of just about every character other than Lir, even the minor ones like Mommy Fortuna and Captain Cully. The metafictional aspects of the story reinforce this: it is about how we tell stories in order to have something permanent remain of us, or in Haggard's case, how we destroy stories for the pleasure of knowing we were the last person to hear them, and something will be forever lost to the rest of the world. Two characters, at different points in the movie, find comfort in knowing that they will always be remembered by a magical animal - for one it is a moment of obscene triumph, for the other it is hard-earned wisdom.
I think the best iteration of the theme comes from Molly, and Grimes's superlative performance (in a movie lousy with great vocal performances - Lee, Lansbury, Arkin in a wonderfully soft and subdued register, Rene Auberjonois in a delightful turn as an alcoholic skeleton - it's especially impressive not that Grimes isn't just the best in show, but that I don't even have to hesitate in making that claim), when she responds to the sight of seeing the beautiful, holy unicorn - the sole object of luminescent white in a movie full of muddy shades - with actual fury that the unicorn didn't appear to hear when she was a young virgin, waiting instead to humiliate her in her frumpy middle age. Later on, she berates Schmendrick for transforming the unicorn into a human with frenzied despair - both moments speak to the misery of a woman lashing out at the joyful childhood she didn't have and is now denied. Beagle has mentioned that Molly's character owes as much to Grimes as to his writing, which isn't wholly fair - he gave her that wonderful monologue of rage upon seeing the unicorn - but it's certainly the case that the performance enriches the character with a great sense of sadness that becomes contentment at the end of the film, but never threatens actual happiness. For that character alone, The Last Unicorn would be top-level fantasy, for me; the fiercely adult nature of Molly and her inner pain, incongruous but also perfectly placed within a realm of magicians and spirit bulls, is what genre films can wallop you with because you're not looking for them.
That said, The Last Unicorn still works purely as a fantasy travelogue, if that's all you want of it: the film is beset with a deep-set feeling of terrifying weirdness, from the designs (Mommy Fortuna and her tree-trunk hat; the savage, triple-breasted harpy she keeps in a cage; the amorphous, internally-illuminated Red Bull; Haggard's desiccated face; hell, even Molly's wild hair, locked into a medusa-like sprawl, is pretty otherworldly), to the simple concepts themselves. This is a kids' movie in which the hero is almost smothered by the giant breasts of an anthropomorphic lady tree; and in which a skeleton gets roaring drunk on imaginary wine before bellowing "uuuuuuuuuuunicorn" with a wrathfulness that's all the nastier for following a scene of absurdist comedy. It's strange and inexplicable as an adult; I presume it must be scary as all hell to a child, what with the savage death of one character, the monstrous implacability of the Red Bull, the unmotivated cruelty of Haggard. Might as well throw in the gentle sense of loss in the final moments: the people we like get happy endings, but they are very ambivalent, theoretical happy endings at best, and not at all satisfying in the conventional way of kids' fantasy (though if ever there was a period where bittersweet, intentionally unfulfilling endings to fantasy stories was in vogue, it was at the end of the '70s and into the '80s sword-and-sorcery boom). It is a film whose triumphant finale involves an immortal being pleased to discover that she has learned the ability to feel regret - powerful and moving, but it can't help but be disquieting as well. It's all part of the warm melancholy that The Last Unicorn has been plying since that first song, and a perfect ending to a marvelously nuanced adventure.
9/10
13 comments:
Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.
Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.
"the stellar 1977 television film The Hobbit"
ReplyDeleteI have not watched it since 8th grade, I confess, but that movie is an abomination from the depths of hell, and such an utter butchering of one of my all-time favorite books it makes the Jackson trilogy look excellent.
I think I told this story before, when you reviewed that piece of shit, but I took freshman advanced English in 8th grade (#humblebrag?) and first read The Hobbit. The following year, and saw and detested the movie right after, in the same class. The following year, most of my friends took the same class, read The Hobbit, generally loved it. Started the movie, the VHS (Christ I'm old) tape broke, to literal applause. Then one girl in the class said she owned it, and brought it in the next day, and several people refused to talk to her for a couple of weeks.
So, this fits between that horrible movie and Nausicaa? I do not know how to process that information.
I'm so glad you liked this; I'm not quite young enough to have this movie define my childhood (I was in my mid-teens when it came out), but it certainly is one of my favorites. I suspect having the author write the screenplay helps it remain more sophisticated than the usual "kiddy movie) (and it is VERY true to the book).
ReplyDeleteDid you watch the original or the slightly-censored version? From what I understand, when it came out on DVD a few "damns" and a "hell" or two were taken out, because it's apparently a rule that in animated movies, fart jokes good, minor expletives bad.
God I could soak in the dialogue from this movie all day long. The gentle poetry with which it's written, the earnest and appropriate emotion with which it's performed...whether it's Haggard explaining his obsession with Unicorns ("Nothing makes me happy, but their shining...and their grace...."), or the unicorn saying farewell at the end ("No sorrow shall live in my heart as long as that joy, save one...and I thank you for that part too...."), or even the laughing skeleton's irritated explanation about how to find the Red Bull ("A clock isn't 'Time', it's just numbers and springs, pay it no mind!"), all of it sings to me in just the most profound way.
ReplyDeleteBut such is the spell of the whole movie, really. The particular blend of moods and tones, both aesthetic and narrative, that this movie achieves is among my personal favorites in the history of the medium, and I say that as someone who first saw it as a teenager in High School (though I do distinctly recall passing the box by many times as a kid, in those halcyon days of Ye Olde Local Video Store), for the record. I'm especially fond of Haggard; not only is Lee's performance splendid (and the actor himself was apparently so attached to the role that he played it again when the movie was dubbed into German!), but the design, a hodge-podge of different authority symbols from different eras (I especially love how Modern-Military his outfit ultimately is, even as it's covered in more medieval details). But ALL the characters are great, and the world they inhabit is one that feels at once dream-like but also eminently believable. And the themes and emotions it grapples, unique not just for animation but movies in general, feel all the more potently realized as a result (helped along, incidentally, by a score that uses Bombast and Softness in perfect balance).
And hey, lucky me! Almost exactly a year ago, I got to see it in a theater with a close friend for whom it is something like Holy Writ. Like the movie itself, it was a profound, unforgettable experience.
Ahhh, this is one of the movies I've most wanted to someday see you review! The strangely literate screenplay is probably my favorite single aspect, but so much of it is great in a profoundly unusual way.
ReplyDeleteAlso while it's very in vogue to act like children can handle anything so we need to amp up the spooky in kid's movies, I think a lot of creative types are way too eager to just project themselves onto kids and take things a little too far. Yeah it is good to have some modest scares but really a lot of kids will start crying from like... lighting changes. At a certain point you're just being pointlessly alienating, and things like a three titted harpy devouring angela lansbury really doesn't belong in a kid's movie.
BUT since I'm an adult I find it fascinating and great, so fuck it.
Wow, this movie is fantastic, and I am glad you also loved it. Thanks Tristan, for requesting it!
ReplyDeleteAlso, I love love love Nausicaä, and had no idea that it was connected to The Last Unicorn at all. But now that I know, it couldn't be more obvious. I wish there were more animated films—or films, period—with that surreal, dreamy, plaintive quality.
Brian—speaking as a fan of the actual Hobbit book, I will defend the Rankin/Bass cartoon at the gates of hell, though I am frankly unsure of what there is to defend, because I'm not sure what Tolkein purists hate so much. The animation is gorgeous, the music and imagery are indelible, and it's not nine goddamned hours long. To me, even if it is less literally faithful in preserving the actual text of the source material than Jackson's films, it is far more faithful in preserving the spirit and tone, while Jackson's trilogy is bogged down in bland, humorless literalism.
I would recommend the book as one of the great pieces of literature of the last century (except maybe for that butterfly, which is still a bizarre bit of writing even in the book, as well, apparently as an author stand-in.) I would hold Peter Beagle up, still, as one of the greatest authors of all time. That dreamy lyricism and gentle complexity and biting absurdity stroll through nearly everything he has written. He makes the fantastic lived in.
ReplyDeleteA few things really fatigued me the last time I watched it, and it almost seems unfair because the rest of it's really a standout for the time.
ReplyDeleteThe America stuff is dreadful, like really bad. It brings the movie down to a level where I don't think a lot of people wanted to be, i.e. what your average person would imagine a movie called "The Last Unicorn" would be like, with wallpaper-like easy listening instrumentation and hyper literal lyrics. Though I'm not sure which was done first, the song or shot choices, so some of it could lean on the Japanese team. But man I have a hard time believing anybody who first heard it as an adult could honestly say it anything but top-notch silliness.
Another thing is the facial animation, probably a consequence of the overseas production, being so vague and muddy that it would be pretty much impossible to tell what emotions were supposed to be passing through the characters with the sound off. Molly's first meeting with the unicorn is a good example, where the actual content of what's going on is absolutely heartbreaking, but instead each eye swims around doing nothing and it's hard to accept the voice and the face have anything in common. And it's really distracting, because the rest of the animation ranges from competent to fantastic, even body language mostly gets it right.
Otherwise, it was nice finding out how great the movie actually was.
Seconding praise of the book--I'm pretty darned picky when it comes to fantasy, but The Last Unicorn is just gorgeous. Everyone must read it.
ReplyDeleteI agree with GeoX/XoeG. I love fantasy as a concept, but it's so hard for me to tolerate a lot of it in book form. I've read the vast majority, if not all, of Peter S. Beagle's fiction, and the man just has a way with words that's incredibly captivating. And since I'm the resident expert for everyone I know, I just want to make sure everyone praising the book here is aware that there's a sequel-ish novella called "Two Hearts" which can be found in the collection The Line Between, and most recently, there's a prequel-ish Schmendrick short story in Sleight of Hand.
ReplyDeleteThis is the definitive movie of my childhood.
ReplyDeleteI am not only thrilled by your review, but by your praise of Molly's voice actor.
Indulge me here - I spent one summer geeking out and creating a list of "best actor nominees" for best performance in a traditionally animated movies. A performance was based on the combustion of character animation and a miraculous vocal performance. I limited the awards to traditionally animated films because I had not seen most CG films. Then I came up with 5 nominees for leading and supporting categories, ala the Oscars. Top Contenders for "Best Actor" were Beast and Tarzan, top contenders for "Best Actress" were Ariel and Mrs. Brisby. My "Best Supporting Actor" was the Genie from Aladdin. One last note: I eliminated all villain characters from my awards because they would dominate the awards too much, and Christopher Lee's Haggard would be in there. So with characters like Medusa and Cruella out of the way, the character Molly from The Last Unicorn was my "Best Supporting Actress" hands down!
One more thing - My sister and I memorized the entire script and quoted it frequently growing up. Our favorite lines were the very ones Molly said that YOU REFERENCED in your review, from "Where...have...you...been!?!" when Molly sees the Unicorn for the first time to "What...have...you..done!?!" when Schmendrick transforms her into a human.
So yeah, I am totally geeking out right now!
...And about the scary stuff in "The Last Unicorn":
ReplyDeleteI was born in 1980, and let me just join the chorus of 80s babies who claim that the "PG" rating means nothing these days. Because I never expected "kids' movies" to be light fare necessarily, I can't say that "The Last Unicorn" "scared" me as a kid, but it did haunt and disturb me with its mysticism and high emotional stakes, and its for that reason that this film, along with The Secret of NIMH, ultimately resonated more.
I don't have much to add that hasn't already been said. This is one of the movies that got me interested in the fantasy genre. So many moments stand out. "The harpy? Oh, she'll kill me one day or another." "Put some more water in the soup, love, there's company." "It's all right, don't be afraid, it's just the bull." "But your eyes, they're empty. As Lir's eyes, as any eyes that... never saw unicorns." As a kid, the line that got my attention was, "A clock isn't time, it's just numbers and springs." (Incidentally, my brother hates the line, "My lady, I am a hero." I can sort of understand his reaction, though in the book Lir goes on to explain that a hero is just a job, like a plumber.)
ReplyDeleteAs for America, it *is* awful, but here it somehow works. And the anachronisms have grown on me ("Come on old man, I'll write you a reference"). Though they worked better in the book, I think.
A few things stand for me in a negative way. I'm not sure what to think about Mia Farrow's performance. She doesn't have much chemistry with the other characters, and she often sounds like she's occupying a completely different plane of existence. Though on the other hand, that's pretty true to her character. It's also unfortunate that she was asked to sing outside of her range.
I like the butterfly, I don't know if Robert Klein was the best choice for the role. He has such a broad, ordinary voice that it almost seems like a contradiction to have him play such a feisty character. (Though it wouldn't surprise me if he was considered to be one of the movie's main draws back in 1982.)
I also have a love/hate affair with the animation. It really seems like the movie would have benefited from having more drawings per second. I understand why they didn't do it, but it gets kind of hard to watch after a while. And some of the background images are a little dreary.
Other than that, the movie is wonderful. I love The Lord of the Rings (the book) because I can take the plot apart and analyze it. But The Last Unicorn is too organic for that. It feels like it was purely a product of intuition.
I love this movie for all the reasons you've mentioned (only unexpectedly hitting my funny bone can make me ugly-cry faster than the scene where Molly sees the unicorn for the first time) but...
ReplyDelete"It's strange and inexplicable as an adult; I presume it must be scary as all hell to a child..."
I can assure you that first seeing this at maybe six years of age was f-ing *life altering*.