08 July 2016

OH MY PURGE AND WHISKERS

I think the Purge series has found its level. After 2014's The Purge: Anarchy represented such a gigantic leap in quality over The Purge from the prior year, I had been willing to drift into some kind of small optimism that the second sequel might be another step up - undoubtedly a less dramatic one. But for the most part, The Purge: Election Year is right in line with its immediate predecessor. It's a little bit worse in some ways - this one is kinda pretty racist, mostly as a direct result of its attempts to be self-consciously anti-racist - and a bit better in a couple more ways. It's the most expensive Purge to date and the money shows up onscreen in the form of generally more polished cinematography, courtesy of three-time Purge director of photography Jacques Jouffret, and some inventively florid costumes designed by series newcomer Elisabeth Vastola. It's also there in the new film's generally grander sense of ambition; after two movies telling individual stories of survival, this one actually tries to dig into the implications and mechanics of the political system the series has established. And it would probably have been better that it not do so, since this opens that system up to a level of narrative scrutiny that it cannot begin to survive. But the attempt to expand things is appreciated.

The beating heart of the movie, however, could just about be cut out and inserted directly into Anarchy, and other than being confused as to why all the characters were suddenly different, I really don't think you could tell. Once again, the movie turns on a lengthy sequence that works its polyglot cast into a lather and dumps them out on the sodium vapor-lit streets of a city at night, devoid of people except for the roving gangs of killers dressed up in freaky costumes, and while it is good at building up a sense of sweaty, tired momentum, it is especially good at reminding you that The Warriors is much better.

Having spent two movies establishing its central hook, the franchise glosses through it pretty quickly this time: on 21 March, at 7:00 PM, all crime becomes legal for twelve hours in the United States, as the New Founding Fathers considers that allowing people to freely murder will ease off on the psychic pressure that would otherwise dominate them, and thus solve both the problems of crime and economic malaise. For reasons that have not been clarified in three pictures now, this somehow works. And once again, the question is unanswered: why only super-elaborate killing sprees? What about the people who patiently wait for 7:01 PM to start insider trading with the Asian markets, or who spend 12 hours stocking up on cocaine and methamphetamine for the next 364 days, or who shit in their neighbors' geraniums? Because then these wouldn't be horror-thrillers, I guess, though Election Year pretty much extinguishes even the fragments of horror that bubbled up only in the last act of Anarchy. Anyway, I would much rather watch a Purge anthology film that deals with the whole spectrum of non-violent crimes than see this exact same scenario play out again when they inevitably make another one of these, but Universal surprisingly hasn't called me in for a meeting yet.

This time around, the New Founding Fathers have a surprisingly robust challenger for the first time in their 25 years of power, in the form of Senator Charlie Roan (Elizabeth Mitchell), who was the sole survivor of a Purge Night massacre 18 years earlier and has built a life as a politician for the specific purpose of legislatively overturning the Purge. (Incidentally, this film presents a top-to-bottom retcon of the franchise's chronology, and to reality. Presidential elections happen in May now, and also not every four years. And yet despite all these changes, and the even more extraordinary change of instituting a state religion, the NFF has deemed it worth leaving the Electoral College in place). The Powers That Be are so scared of Roan's insurgent campaign that they've rescinded the one sacrosanct Purge Rule, that high-ranking government officials can't be killed, just to assassinate her. But her grizzled bodyguard Leo Barnes (Frank Grillo), who suffered through the events of Anarchy without a character name, has all the street smarts and fearlessness to give her a fighting chance to make it through the night.

Elsewhere in Washington, D.C., a convenience store owner named Joe Dixon (Mykelti Wilson) readies himself to defend the store all night against the obnoxious little sociopath who tried to steal a candy bar from him, aided only by his trusty employee Marcos (Joseph Julian Soria), and comforted by the presence of local bad-girl-turned-Good-Samaritan Laney Rucker (Betty Gabriel), who spends the night finding victims and driving them to a neutral triage center, in which capacity she has some connection to radical anti-NFF media figure and resistance fighter Dante Bishop (Edwin Hodge). It is no surprise when these storylines converge, and the film becomes peculiarly jejune about evoking Black Lives Matter in the course of a story where many black people put themselves in harm's way to protect a blonde white lady so saintly that in a hospital scene, she's light from above like a golden angel while the rest of the frame is dark.

I'll give Election Year this much: it's probably, or even certainly, the most interesting of the Purge movies to date, though Anarchy's social satire was far less muddled, and not only because the new film ties itself in knots about race. Writer-director James DeMonaco's script this time around (he's been the series' lead creator all along) is bursting at the edges with observations about how America's political scene works, and they suggest more than anything a work of Purge fan fiction written by an eighth-grader who just finished a Modern American History course. Did you know that sometimes, Florida is the key "swing state" that determines the presidential election, thanks to the nature of the Electoral College? I should fucking well hope you did, if you're old enough to buy tickets to an R-rated movie in the United States. There's nothing else that remedial, thank God. I do, though, have to question the internal integrity of a movie that tries to map modern American politics onto a fantasy world, necessitating an apparent authoritarian political party, with decidedly Nazi-ish iconography that still holds open elections which it seemingly does not tamper with or influence in any way, to such a degree that the opposition party holds a sizable chunk of the still-in-existence U.S. Congress.

As much as it's a failure of satire or social commentary in any meaningful way, and as much as it's such a burble of incoherent White Guilt balderdash trafficking in patently screenwritten African-American Vernacular English that it feels like Violence Porn Edition Crash, I gotta give Election Year its due. When all of that shuts up, and it's just about Barnes leading Roan, Dixon, and Marcos around the desolate war zone of Washington, the film's got the goods. The series trademarks of repulsively-lit streets populated by vaguely humanoid figures laughing and dancing like religious ecstatics are in fine form; while the climactic tableau isn't quite as gonzo in its conception as in the last film, it still presents a tense countdown staged with some fair verve. I am particularly enthusiastic about the barely-developed subplot about "murder tourism", in which Europeans and South Africans travel to America to have fun Purging; it's enough of an idea to support a movie on its own (alas, like every idea in the Purges, it's left to dry up on the vine), but the two major scenes it provides to this film are its highlight. The one that's been getting the most advertising time is the confrontation with a group of Russians chanting sing-song threats in a mixture of their own language and heavily-accented English, while dressed as nightmare versions of iconic American figures - a leering, demonic Uncle Sam, a neon-lit corpse-faced Statue of Liberty. And it's pretty great. But for my money, the really terrific scene precedes it by just a bit, as Barnes and Roan outrun a toy drone tricked out with garish colored lights, like a floating ball of toxic waste, as angry Russian is sworn out of apparently nowhere. It's confusing and chaotic and the harsh Slavic consonants add the texture of Eastern European dark fantasy to it, in a most appealing way.

Obviously the whole movie isn't anywhere close to that level, but I'm happy to have had even one A+ moment in a film as generally dotty as Election Year. At this point, I think we can safely assume that there's not likely to be a Purge movie to actually elucidate its setting in any clear manner that can be intelligibly applied to our own world, but as long as they manage to squeak out one really great setpiece every time... All I'm saying is that genre film fans know how to subsist on such a meager diet as that.

5/10

Reviews in this series
The Purge (DeMonaco, 2013)
The Purge: Anarchy (DeMonaco, 2014)
The Purge: Election Year (DeMonaco, 2016)

13 comments:

  1. The fact that this can reasonably be listed in "worthy sequels" is pretty embarrassing for the Purge franchise. This feels like it was cobbled together by those people who post political rants on Facebook after only reading the headlines.

    ReplyDelete
  2. bursting at the edges with observations about how America's political scene works, and they suggest more than anything a work of Purge fan fiction written by an eighth-grader who just finished a Modern American History course. Did you know that sometimes, Florida is the key "swing state" that determines the presidential election, thanks to the nature of the Electoral College?

    International audiences, I suspect.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I always assumed the non-violent criminals stayed away and didnt do anything because of the killing spree people. If one person is going round doing killing sprees, the inside traders, drug users and petty vandals will die without protection.

    This film breaks suspension of dis belief. The idea that the American president is powerful enough to stop the purge. American democracy has so many checks and balances its a wonder they even approved a purge!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, I enjoyed myself. This seems to be the entry where the series switches to just a straight up 80s-type action-thriller (with maybe a few bits of horror imagery here and there), and I'm totally fine with that.

    Not sure what they're going to make the next one about, but I'm fine ignoring the silliness in these movies as long as they are entertaining.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Brennan- That's such a great comparison.

    Andy- I'm sure that's the rationale they went with, but then it's buried literally right in the middle of a sequence where no other aspect of the American electoral system is explained. Like we're expected to understand automatically what "over 270 electoral votes" and "swing state" mean, but think that "Florida is a key swing state" is exciting news. Or something. It's weird as hell.

    J.S.- Suspending that particular disbelief has been a big thing for me ever since the series began. It requires a complete do-over of the Constitution for the world we see to possibly exist, but all the hints we get - and they're confirmed in this film - imply that the films' conception of their politics is what we have now with meaner Republicans.

    franklinshepard- I would certainly not begrudge you that! I was certainly never bored and it held my attention real close, just not always in a positive way.

    As for the next one, all my chips would be on a prequel set during the first Purge. I think something like that was the original plan for the third movie, but then they got Grillo to come back.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I absolutely adored Anarchy and am looking forward to this one, even if, as you say, it veers too much into white guilt preachiness. We need more dumb, bloody 80s style action thrillers, as far as I'm concerned. And Grillo is always awesome to watch.

    And those pictures of the demonic founding fathers are just magical

    ReplyDelete
  7. I've actually seen the film now. The Purges didnt start in 2000. This film is set in the 2040s. Roan's family were killed in the 2020s. This raises worse problems but your review is inaccurate.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I didn't catch any dates at all, but every online source that bothers to mention the date claims that the movie is set in 2025. But you're right that 2040 doesn't cause any fewer problems. Where did you notice the date?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The purge number was 6 in anarchy. Its the 24th annual purge now. This is my sole evidence. Plus it takes more than 2 years for sarge to go from The Punisher to Senator Bodyguard.

      The time lines screwed worse than the social commentary. Unless Matthew Vaughn (or Paul Verhoeven) directs the next one, Im not interested anymore. DeMonaco's universe has no logic.

      Delete
  9. Hold the phone. So in this 'verse, prominent politicians are (or rather, were) the only people off-limits under the Purge? And the crafters of this thought that Americans, with their sometimes overdone, sometimes subdued (depending on other current events like wars) distrust of politicians would be okay with this? Just, no. Not in a country where four presidents and one likely front-runner were shot dead and at least five (off the top of my head; too lazy to go to Wikipedia right now) survived assassination attempts. Not in a country (or a planet, really; lest we forget Britain's recent MP murder) where people routinely talk about how various politicians should be killed (and were doing it long before Internet comments sections), and sometimes actually mean it (okay, to this day John Wilkes Booth was the only non-"lone nut" presidential assassin, but hey, now all the John Hinckleys of the world have a chance to rape the Jodie Fosters at gunpoint). If the Purge were somehow legislated into reality, the politicians would be the first to go. Well, okay, their Secret Service guards would probably precede them, but they'd be second.

    I mean, come on. Regardless of your political slant, would anyone respect, let alone vote for, a politician who goes in front of a press conference and says, "To help ease national stress, all crime should be legal for 24 hours each year, including murder. Except for us. We're too important."

    TLDR: This series sounds like garbage, and I'm staying far away.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Okay, so more than five presidents survived assassination attempts. And somehow this history buff completely forgot about Samuel Byck attempting to kill Nixon by airplane 27 years before 9/11 or Jerry Ford's two attempts in less than a month.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_assassination_attempts_and_plots#Assassination_attempts

    Damn, now I really want to see Sondheim's "Assassins".

    ReplyDelete
  11. I haven't seen any of The Purge movies. But they strike me as being naively offensive, since there are many places in the US where violent crime is basically always legal. When I think of these movies, I picture a very sheltered group of Americans saying, "Can you imagine what would happen if violent crime was legal?" And another group of Americans think to themselves, "Wait... they don't know??"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It does strike me as a flimsy foundation on which to build a single thriller, nevermind a franchise. The fact that it's insistently set in America specifically as a result of government action makes it sound like it wants to be About Something--like maybe a crypto-libertarian screed about how everyone should be ready to defend themselves for when the government goes too far. Or an anti-libertarian screed that says advocating zero government will lead to the worst of society taking advantage of lawlessness instead of greater freedom for all. Or just something besides "wouldn't this be SO SCARY if murder were legal?" And it sounds like the more the series tries to explain and justify its world, the shakier it gets.

      I want to know how the economy handles a massive routine loss of swathes of its labor force, myself. I suppose at least the funeral industry makes a killing off it.

      Delete

Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.

Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.