11 January 2017

IF I COULD SING TO THE ANIMALS

Buried in Sing is the year's most harrowing story of a married family life crushing the life out of the people involved. This children's comedy about singing animals includes a subplot about a pig-woman who only wants to do is have a chance to sing mediocre pop songs and have any other living soul recognise that she has an inner life. But she is so ignored by her husband and 25 children that she's able to replace herself with a tape recorder set up in a Rube Goldbergian device to feed the family, and nobody notices for at least a couple of days, apparently. Meanwhile, she is treated as a prop by the singing partner she's been set up with by a distracted show manager, and continues to have no outlet for her own actual personality, but thank Christ, at least she's getting out of the house. This is, as far as I can discern, meant to be A) funny; B) comprehensible to children. I can't speak to B, but as far as A goes, it'd be like laughing at one of Vittorio De Sica's neorealist films about the brutalisation of women, if they had been made with fuck ugly cartoon pigs.

So yes, Sing. Illumination Entertainment's seventh feature - and second of 2016, following The Secret Life of Pets, the studio's fastest turnaround between projects yet - which is absolutely not their worst. Hop hasn't be retroactively wiped from existence, I'm sorry to say. But it's pretty altogether dreary, putting, count 'em, six massively trite subplots into a blender, half of them totally inappropriate for the audience of small children who make up the only audience that could imaginably find Sing to be in any way fresh or interesting, and mashes them into a uniform past that can be spackled across 108 unreasonably long minutes. Those are, for the record, Rosita the pig (Reese Witherspoon) and her toxic home life; Johnny the cockney gorilla (Taron Egerton), who wants to get out of the life of crime being forced on him by his gang-leader dad (Peter Serafinowicz), in a perverse My First Guy Ritchie Flick situation; Mike the womansing asshole mouse (Seth MacFarlane), who gets in deep to some Russian bear mobsters while trying to make it with a lady mouse; Meena the shy elephant (Tori Kelly) who has a powerhouse of a voice but absolutely no confidence to use it; and Ash the teenage punk porcupine who is definitely a teenage teenager despite having the husky voice of Scarlett Johansson, which puts us into some amazingly horrible new animated version of the ol' "too old to play a high-schooler" bit that's been going on since the '50s; anyway, Ash is one-half of a band with her boyfriend Lance (Beck Bennett), who keeps insulting her down to make sure he can stay the lead singer even though she has more talent.

Binding these plots together, and providing, I guess, the A-plot, is the saga of Buster Moon (Matthew McConaughey), a koala whose dream since childhood has been to be a great theater impresario. Sadly, the Moon Theater is on its last legs, and as a Hail Mary attempt to stave off the creditors and finally put on a show that people will want to see, he concocts the idea of a singing competition, with a cash prize. When his senile lizard secretary, Miss Crawly (Garth Jennings, the writer-director) accidentally prints fliers with the prize listed as $100,000 instead of $1000, the whole town goes crazy, forcing the quick-thinking marsupial into all sorts of crafty schemes to keep himself afloat. The above-mentioned five characters are, of course, the finalists, with the dance-averse Rosita getting paired with the loud German pig Gunter (Nick Kroll), and it should come as little surprise that most of these characters all end up learning a lot about themselves and growing as people heavily anthropomorphised animals. I am happy to report that the solitary exception is Mike, who remains a seedy little shit until the very last frame we see of him, which on top of being gifted with the only professional voice actor in the main cast and also one of only two leads who is reasonably accomplished as a singer is enough to make him the solitary enjoyable character in the movie, even if MacFarlane's Sinatra impression is frankly rather thin.

Sing is all the worst tendencies of contemporary major-studio 3-D animation with none of the merits. As the plot concept almost inherently requires, it is an excuse for a truly heroic number of pop songs to show up: 64, according to Cartoon Brew, two of them originals (that list includes some classical music as well). Most of them are only snippets, heard in an audition montage that plays as a game of "Name That Tune" for the damned, but a healthy number are given fairly extensive screentime, some in the original recording, others in versions choked out by the cast members as best they can. There's everything from an overblown version of the Beatles' "Golden Slumbers" belted out by Jennifer Hudson to an only slightly autotuned Egerton tromping through "I'm Still Standing" to, oh my God you will never believe it, Leonard Cohen's "Hallelujah" sung with too much coloratura by Kelly; presumably, this is the filmmakers' attempt to acknowledge that there is no possibility that Sing would exist without Shrek, and to at least vaguely own that fact. Anything written in the 21st Century and thus at least mostly likely to be familiar to the target audience is contained within the audition montage.

The soundtrack is a pandering grind, mostly ultra-famous hits presented in comfortingly familiar arrangements, but at least it fits in the world of the movie, which is very distinctly our world but with animals living in it. Pretty boring animals, too. I have limited affection for Zootopia, but at least it gave a great deal of thought to mapping personalities and behaviors onto species in a way that foregrounded the cast's bestial nature. It provides a stark contrast to Sing, where the animals are talking animals because talking animals sell. The koala runs a theater and the pig is a housewife. It's kind of a coy, fun visual that the punks are porcupines, and use their own quills as accessories. Only very infrequently is there an actual gag based on the fact that these are actually animals, like when Meena uses her trunk as a prehensile suction cup. Otherwise, it's just there: rabbits twerk, and sheep play video games, and pigs go grocery shopping, and terriers are awful Japanese stereotypes, and they would do these things in much the same way if they were people. I would like to say that the characters are bland, but that's only true from the perspective of the script; visually, they are actively unpleasant, falling into some heretofore-undiscovered dell within the Uncanny Valley, where they have uncomfortably evocative expressions beaming out of faces that have buffed-out, vague textures (Buster is a particularly unsettling example: his eyes and nose feel like smudges taped onto finely-detailed fur, and it's as disorienting as the non-Euclidean geometry of R'lyeh).

It's dispiritingly poor, not nearly splendid enough in its repulsiveness to get down to, say, Shark Tale level, but stuck at the level of toxic mediocrity. Mostly, it's just addicted to clichés, given just the smallest amount of zest by the limitless possibilities of animation, by which I mean that there's a physically improbable flood at one point, that immediately leads into the "at their lowest" phase of the six storylines that I think you have probably already correctly predicted. It's colorful, at least, traditionally the one saving grace of Illumination productions. But that's not nearly enough, and I would wish this on no parent, nor even their most undiscerning children.

4/10

8 comments:

  1. And here I was hoping that because a known British Indie Director (the one who did Son of Rambow no less) was attached, the film would pull off a Paddington Surprise and turn out to be good. So sad that it doesn't do that.

    On TFE you used to do a thing covering animated films less known to the public which were on the Academy Long List. Will you be doing so this year? There's some high profile contenders, including Red Turtle from Studio Ghibli (sort of), Phantom Boy from the Cat in Paris team, Miss Hokusai (GKids big weapon) and last but not least Your Name, which came from nowhere to become the new highest grossing Anime film, it's Chinese and South Korean grosses allowing it to defeat even Spirited Away.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is the single most toxic 4/10 review that you have ever put out. My God, I was expecting a 3.

    At least Rogue One is going to keep Sing! away from the number 1 spot in the US box office for its entire run. Across the pond however, January is not considered to be the absolute pits. They have postponed the release date such that it has virtually no competition for the top place in the UK...outside of maybe Hacksaw Ridge, or crowds of people opting to rewatch La La Land....or...or...

    *Quickly does some background reading*

    OH SHIT THERE'S A SEQUEL TO TRAINSPOTTING?! Coming out on that same date? And I have no idea that this is happening thanks to nearly zero promotion/advertising? This is not looking good.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That first paragraph is doing a terrible job at keeping me at my original POV of not wanting to see this.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "there's a physically improbable flood at one point"

    So the whole thing is Cats Don't Dance?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I did wonder if this got fast-tracked for release after Zootopia made a literal billion dollars and someone realized the world is full of secret furries and by god they wanted their slice of the pie. Especially when the first previews gave no indication of the plot and just went with "wait but we've got sassy talking animals AND twenty pop songs you've heard to death, isn't that hiiiii-larious?"--it just screamed cash-in to me.

    When they retooled the previews to "the inspiring drama of one overworked mother who wants more than a life of domestic drudgery", I hoped it meant that it was testing poorly and they were scrambling to salvage it, but sadly it's managed to recoup and then some.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This year, I read nothing more existentially horrifying than an interview with the director of Sing where he bragged about how he didn't try to make his animals feel like animals at all and he worked hard to make the physics of the movie seem perfectly real. Like that's the point.

    But (SPOILERS) I WAS amused by the oddly intense flood sequence, if only for reasons similar to your opening paragraph. It was like a little slice of the second half of Titanic suddenly exploded into this kids' movie.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I like Leonard Cohen's music a lot (RIP), but holy crap do I wish people would cover songs other than 'Hallelujah'. It's got to the point where I'm starting to dislike that song.

    Also, I had to put up with one of the awful trailers twice, in which 'Groove Is In The Heart' is mashed up with some Christmas song. It is insufferable.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Over the holidays the preview came on during a a commercial. My father-in-law (who ostensibly likes his grandchildren) leaned over toward my 7-year old daughter and asked, "Would you like to see that movie?"
    Before the chill that accompanies parental horror of bad movie choices finished running down my spine, my daughter responded, "Why would I want to see THAT?" In that moment I realized that I must be doing something right.

    ReplyDelete

Just a few rules so that everybody can have fun: ad hominem attacks on the blogger are fair; ad hominem attacks on other commenters will be deleted. And I will absolutely not stand for anything that is, in my judgment, demeaning, insulting or hateful to any gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. And though I won't insist on keeping politics out, let's think long and hard before we say anything particularly inflammatory.

Also, sorry about the whole "must be a registered user" thing, but I do deeply hate to get spam, and I refuse to take on the totalitarian mantle of moderating comments, and I am much too lazy to try to migrate over to a better comments system than the one that comes pre-loaded with Blogger.